Cited by 285Diverse Aspects of Tourism ResearchGlobal Healthcare and Medical TourismRecreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management

Product bundles and market segments based on travel motivations: A canonical correlation approach

Chul Oh, Heung, Uysal, Muzaffer, Weaver, Pamela A.·1995·International Journal of Hospitality Management

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0278-4319(95)00010-a

Cites

21 of 21 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Chul Oh, H., Uysal, M., & Weaver, P. A.
Affiliations
Virginia Tech (US)
Venue
International Journal of Hospitality Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
123-137
ISSN
0278-4319 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1964578545
Cited by
285
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 12 · 2017: 15 · 2016: 16 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 16
FWCI
10.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
International Journal of Hospitality Management (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Diverse Aspects of Tourism Research
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Global Healthcare and Medical Tourism
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Recreation, Leisure, Wilderness Management
Keywords
tourist motivation, push and pull motivation, market segmentation, product bundles, tourism promotion, tourism marketing, Australian tourists

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review