Cited by 25Fluid Dynamics and MixingGranular flow and fluidized bedsHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media

Heat transfer mechanism in bubble columns

Verma, A.K.·1989·The Chemical Engineering Journal

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0300-9467(89)80088-7

Cites

11 of 11 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Verma, A. K.
Affiliations
University of Illinois Chicago (US)
Corresponding author
Verma, A.K.
Venue
The Chemical Engineering Journal
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1989-12
Volume
42
Issue
3
Pages
205-208
ISSN
0300-9467 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2029844901
Cited by
25
References
11
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2016: 2
FWCI
0.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
The Chemical Engineering Journal (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Granular flow and fluidized beds
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
Keywords
bubble column, heat transfer coefficient, empirical correlations, air-water system, glass beads, superficial gas velocity, column diameter, particle volume fraction, internal, radial position, Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm, reactor scale-up

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review