Cited by 309Fluid Dynamics and MixingHeat and Mass Transfer in Porous MediaHeat Transfer and Boiling Studies

On the mechanism of heat transfer in bubble column reactors

Deckwer, W.-D.·1980·Chemical Engineering Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0009-2509(80)85127-x

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Deckwer, W.-D.
Affiliations
Leibniz University Hannover (DE)
Corresponding author
Deckwer, W.-D.
Venue
Chemical Engineering Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1980
Volume
35
Issue
6
Pages
1341-1346
ISSN
0009-2509 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2009895704
Cited by
309
References
12
Citations by year
2026: 7 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 6 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 5
FWCI
6.64
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Chemical Engineering Science (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Fluid Dynamics and Mixing
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat and Mass Transfer in Porous Media
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Heat Transfer and Boiling Studies
Keywords
bubble column, heat transfer, heat transfer coefficient, gas-liquid dispersion, surface renewal theory, exothermic reaction, Prandtl number effects

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review