Cited by 23Artificial Intelligence in HealthcarePregnancy and preeclampsia studiesArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education

A computerized diagnostic system for the interpretation of umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveforms

Open access
Beksaç, M.Sinan, Başaran, Funda, Eskiizmirliler, Selim, Erkmen, Aydan M., Yörükan, Selma·1996·European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology

Abstract

Objective Development of an artificial intelligent diagnostic system for the interpretation of umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform measurements.Study design Study design comprised several stages including data acquisition, image processing and analysis, training of artificial neural network and testing the predictive value of the system. The clinical material was handled in two groups. The training group consisted of 952 umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform images of 174 normal pregnancies with normal outcome, while the testing group was composed of 138 images derived from 20 normal pregnancies with normal outcome and 68 images of 16 high risk pregnancies with poor outcome. All subjects were evaluated by Doppler ultrasonography and umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform images were transferred to the computer environment by means of a special data acquisition system. Automated image processing and analysis were performed to derive indices such as A/B ratio, resistance index, pulse related index, area ratio of wave and angle of coincident slopes. We have used a supervised artificial neural network (back propagation learning algorithm) to develop an intelligent diagnostic system which is called the BOLU system.Results This version of the system was trained with the umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform images of normal pregnancies. Thus, the BOLU system decides whether the tested image is normal for a given gestational week or not. The specificity and sensitivity of this system were estimated to be 98.6% and 51.5% respectively.Conclusion We have developed an artificial intelligent diagnostic system for the interpretation of umbilical artery blood flow velocity waveform measurements. Waveform indices were obtained automatically by image processing and analysis. The predictive value of the system was found to be satisfactory.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0301-2115(95)02256-2

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 22 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Maulik D, Yarlagadda P, Youngblood JP, Willoughby L. Com- ponents of variability of umbilical arterial Doppler velocimetry. Am J Obstet Gynecol 1989; 160: 1406-1412.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Beksaç, M. S., Başaran, F., Eskiizmirliler, S., Erkmen, A. M., & Yörükan, S.
Affiliations
Middle East Technical University (TR)
Venue
European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1996-01
Volume
64
Issue
1
Pages
37-42
ISSN
  • 0028-2243 (ISSN-L)
  • 0301-2115
OpenAlex
W2010736162
Cited by
23
References
22
Citations by year
2023: 1 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 3
FWCI
1.05
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • OpenMETU (Middle East Technical University) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Health Information Management › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Pregnancy and preeclampsia studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Keywords
Doppler ultrasound, artificial neural networks, fetal growth restriction, high-risk pregnancy, resistance index, A/B ratio, fetal biophysical profile
MeSH terms
Blood Flow Velocity, Female, Humans, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Pregnancy, Umbilical Arteries, Neural Networks, Computer, Ultrasonography, Doppler

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review