Cited by 189Pain Management and Opioid UseAnesthesia and Pain ManagementOpioid Use Disorder Treatment

The effect of ethnicity on prescriptions for patient-controlled analgesia for post-operative pain

Ng, Bernardo, Dimsdale, Joel E., Rollnik, Jens D., Shapiro, Harvey·1996·Pain

Abstract

We studied if ethnicity influences patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for the treatment of post-operative pain. Using a retrospective record review, we examined data from all patients treated with PCA for post-operative pain from January to June 1993. We excluded patients who did not have surgery prior to the prescription of PCA or were not prescribed PCA in the immediate post-operative period. The sample consisted of 454 subjects. While there were no differences in the amount of narcotic self-administered, there were significant differences in the amount of narcotic prescribed among Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, and Whites (F--7,352, P < 0.01). The ethnic differences in prescribed analgesic persisted after controlling for age, gender, pre-operative use of narcotics, pain site, and insurance status. Patient's ethnicity has a greater impact on the amount of narcotic prescribed by the physician than on the amount of narcotic self-administered by the patient.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0304-3959(96)02955-7

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Ng et al. found that ethnic background was significantly related to the amount of medication prescribed for postoperative pain, with physicians prescribing significantly higher levels of narcotic for blacks than Hispanics and significantly higher levels for whites than Hispanics.

    “Data analyses showed that ethnic background was significantly related to the amount of medication prescribed, with physicians prescribing significantly higher levels of narcotic for blacks than Hispanics and significantly higher levels for whites than Hispanics.”
  • In Ng et al., ethnic background related to physician prescribing of analgesic but not to the total amount of narcotic actually self-administered.

    “It is interesting that ethnic background related to physician prescribing of analgesic but not to the total amount of narcotic that was actually self-administered.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ng, B., Dimsdale, J. E., Rollnik, J. D., & Shapiro, H.
Affiliations
  • University of California San Diego (US)
  • Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Corresponding author
Dimsdale, Joel E.
Venue
Pain
Published
1996-07
Volume
66
Issue
1
Pages
9-12
ISSN
0304-3959 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2003659264
Cited by
189
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 7 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 8 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 11
FWCI
4.97
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Pain (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine › Pain Management and Opioid Use
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Anesthesia and Pain Management
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Opioid Use Disorder Treatment
Keywords
patient-controlled analgesia, postoperative pain, ethnicity, racial disparities, opioid prescribing, Asian patients, Black patients, Hispanic patients
MeSH terms
Adult, Black or African American, Ethnicity, Female, Hispanic or Latino, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Narcotics, Postoperative Pain, Drug Prescriptions, Self Administration, Analgesia, Patient-Controlled, White People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review