Cited by 121Archaeology and ancient environmental studiesLivestock and Poultry ManagementForensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies

The domestic chicken (Gallus gallus) in sub-Saharan Africa: A background to its introduction and its osteological differentiation from indigenous fowls (Numidinae and Francolinus sp.)

MacDonald, Kevin C.·1992·Journal of Archaeological Science

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0305-4403(92)90019-y

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The zooarchaeological record demonstrates that chickens were present in West African Mande-speaking territory prior to their arrival in the northern Sahel.

    “The zooarchaeological record, however, demonstrates that chickens were present in West African Mande-speaking territory prior to their arrival in the northern Sahel (66, 67) (SI Appendix, Table S2).”

    From The biocultural origins and dispersal of domestic chickens (2022) · cites this paper as [67]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
MacDonald, K. C.
Corresponding author
MacDonald, Kevin C.
Venue
Journal of Archaeological Science
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1992-05
Volume
19
Issue
3
Pages
303-318
ISSN
0305-4403 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1969365765
Cited by
121
References
16
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 25 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Archaeological Science (publishedVersion)
  • UCL Discovery (University College London) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Paleontology › Archaeology and ancient environmental studies
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Animal Science and Zoology › Livestock and Poultry Management
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Archeology › Forensic Anthropology and Bioarchaeology Studies
Keywords
chickens, Gallus gallus, guinea fowl, osteometry, zooarchaeology, animal introduction, cultural contact, prehistoric birds, West Africa, sub-Saharan Africa

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review