CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 381Microtubule and mitosis dynamicsNeuroscience and Neuropharmacology ResearchNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 58 of the 61 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 in the nervous system of the rat studied by immunofluorescence

De Camilli, P., Miller, P.E., Navone, F., Theurkauf, W.E., Vallee, R.B.·1984·Neuroscience
DOI 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90194-5
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

It has recently been reported that high molecular weight microtubule-associated proteins are differently distributed in dendrites and axons of neurons [ Matus Bernhardt and Hugh-Jones (1981), Proc. natn Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 78, 3010-3014; Vallee (1982), J. Cell Biol. 92, 435-442]. We have reported earlier in a preliminary form [Miller, Walter, Theurkauf , Vallee and De Camilli (1982), Proc. natn Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 79, 5562-5566] that an antiserum specific for microtubule-associated protein 2, one of the most prominent high molecular weight microtubule-associated proteins in brain and a major brain phosphoprotein, stains specifically neuronal dendrites and perikarya. We have now extended those observations by performing a detailed analysis of the distribution of microtubule-associated protein 2 throughout the nervous system of the rat. We found that microtubule-associated protein 2 is present at high concentrations in the great majority of neurons. Under our conditions of immunostaining microtubule-associated protein 2 was not detected in nonneuronal cells. In all neurons it was compartmentalized in perikarya and dendrites. In most cases, the latter were more heavily stained than perikarya. The pattern of staining (overall intensity, relative intensity in dendrites vs perikarya, and in proximal vs distal segments of the dendritic tree), varied in different classes of neurons but was identical for all neurons with similar geometry in the same brain region. Different patterns of sta…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0306-4522(84)90194-5

Cites

58 of 58 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 61 references

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Aamodt, 1983, MAPs mediate association of microtubules and neurofilaments in vitro, Biophys. J., 41, 86a
  2. Golgi, 1883, Sulla fine anatomia degli organi centrali del sistema nervoso. IV. Sulla fine anatomia delle circonvoluzioni cerebellari, Riv. sper. Freniat. Med. leg. Alien. Ment., 9, 1
  3. Kandel, 1977, Neuronal plasticity and the modification of behaviour, Vol. 1, 1137
  4. Papasozomenos, 1972, A monoclonal antibody to microtubule-associated protein (MAP2) localizes with neurofilaments in the b,b′-iminodiproprionitrile (IDPN) model, J. Cell Biol., 95, 341a
  5. Peloquin, 1979, Cell and tissue distribution of the major high molecular weight microtubule-associated protein from brain, J. Cell Biol., 83, 338a
  6. Ramón, 1911, Vol. 1,II
  7. Theurkauf, 1982, Phosphorylation of MAP2 by cAMP-dependent protein kinase, J. Cell Biol., 95, 340a
  8. Vallee, 1982, Identification of MAPs from diverse sources using taxol, J. Cell Biol., 95, 339a

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 381

Related

Metadata

Authors
De Camilli, P., Miller, P. E., Navone, F., Theurkauf, W. E., & Vallee, R. B.
Affiliations
  • Yale University (US)
  • University of Milan (IT)
ORCID
Venue
Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-04
Volume
11
Issue
4
Pages
819-846
ISSN
0306-4522 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0306-4522(84)90194-5
OpenAlex
W2030804101
Cited by
381
References
61
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 4
FWCI
13.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Cell Biology › Microtubule and mitosis dynamics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neuropharmacology Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
MAP2, dendrites, perikarya, neuronal localization, dendritic microtubules, axons, axon terminals, primary sensory neurons, dendritic branching, nervous system, rat brain, phosphoproteins, neuronal ultrastructure, dendritic growth, dendritic plasticity
MeSH terms
Animals, Autonomic Nervous System, Brain Stem, Cerebellum, Cerebral Cortex, Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Ganglia, Spinal, Hippocampus, Microtubule-Associated Proteins, Nervous System, Proteins, Rats, Inbred Strains, Retina, Spinal Cord, Rats

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review