Cited by 22Research in Cotton CultivationIrrigation Practices and Water ManagementAgriculture, Soil, Plant Science

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

The validation of GOSSYM: Part 1—Arizona conditions

Fye, R.E., Reddy, V.R., Baker, D.N.·1984·Agricultural Systems

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0308-521x(84)90088-x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 11

  1. Baker, 1972, Simulation of growth in cotton: I. Gross photosynthesis, respiration, and growth, Crop Sci., 12, 431, 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200040010x · DOI · Paper page
  2. Baker, 1983, GOSSYM: A simulator of cotton crop growth and yield, S. C. Agri. Exp. Stn. Bull. 1083
  3. Bruce, 1965, Fruiting and growth characteristics of cotton in relation to soil moisture tension, Agron. J., 57, 135, 10.2134/agronj1965.00021962005700020003x · DOI
  4. Hesketh, 1972, Simulation of growth and yield in cotton: II. Environmental control of morphogenesis, Crop Sci., 12, 436, 10.2135/cropsci1972.0011183X001200040011x · DOI
  5. Jones, 1974, Development of a nitrogen balance for cotton growth model: A first approximation, Crop Sci., 14, 541, 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400040014x · DOI · Paper page
  6. Kafkafi, 1978, Fertilization decision model—A synthesis of soil and plant parameters in a computerized program, Soil Sci., 125, 261, 10.1097/00010694-197804000-00011 · DOI
  7. Lambert, 1983, RHIZOS: A simulator of row crop rhizopheres, S. C. Agri. Exp. Stn. Bull.
  8. Landivar, 1983, Application of GOSSYM to genetic feasibility studies. II. Analyses of increasing photosynthesis, specific leaf weight and longevity of leaves in cotton, Crop. Sci., 23, 504, 10.2135/cropsci1983.0011183X002300030015x · DOI
  9. Phene, 1978, SPAR—A soil-plant-atmosphere research system, Trans. ASAE, 21, 923, 10.13031/2013.35415 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Ritchie, 1972, Model for predicting evaporation from a row crop with incomplete cover, Water Resour. Res., 8, 1204, 10.1029/WR008i005p01204 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Stapleton, 1973, Cotton: A computer simulation of cotton growth, Arizona Agric. Exp. Stn. Tech. Bull. No. 123

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Fye, R. E., Reddy, V. R., & Baker, D. N.
Affiliations
Agricultural Research Service (US)
Venue
Agricultural Systems
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1984-01
Volume
14
Issue
2
Pages
85-105
ISSN
0308-521X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2028947425
Cited by
22
References
0
Citations by year
2020: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Agricultural Systems (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Research in Cotton Cultivation
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Soil Science › Irrigation Practices and Water Management
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Agronomy and Crop Science › Agriculture, Soil, Plant Science
Keywords
cotton, crop simulation models, model validation, water stress, canopy photosynthesis, plant hardening, root growth, plant height growth, leaf growth, Arizona

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review