Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 664

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study

Igbaria, Magid, Iivari, Juhani, Maragahh, Hazem·1995·Information & Management
DOI 10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Research works printed but not linked: 24

  1. Adams, 1992, Perceived usefulness, ease of use, and usage of information technology: A replication, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, 227, 10.2307/249577 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Aharoni, 1994, Is management science international: In search of universal rules, Management Science, Vol. 40, 1, 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.1 · DOI
  3. Alwin, 1975, Decomposition of effects in path analysis, American Sociological Review, Vol. 40, 37, 10.2307/2094445 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Bandura, 1986, The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory, Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, Vol. 4, 359, 10.1521/jscp.1986.4.3.359 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Billings, 1978, Use of path analysis in industrial/organizational psychology: criticism and suggestions, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 63, 677, 10.1037/0021-9010.63.6.677 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Brody, 1992, The pleasure machine, Technology Review, 31
  7. Blair, 1987, Cognitive process used by survey respondents to answer behavioral frequency questions, Journal of Consumer Research, vol. 14, 280, 10.1086/209112 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Cheney, 1982, Organizational characteristics and information systems success: An extrapolation investigation, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 25, 170, 10.2307/256032 · DOI
  9. Davis, 1989, User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models, Management Science, Vol. 35, 982, 10.1287/mnsc.35.8.982 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dickerson, 1983, Characteristics of adopters and non-adopters of home computers, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 10, 225, 10.1086/208961 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hill, 1987, Role of efficacy expectations in predicting the decision to use advanced technologies: The case of computers, Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 72, 307, 10.1037/0021-9010.72.2.307 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Hirschman, 1980, Innovativeness, novelty seeking, and consumer creativity, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 7, 283, 10.1086/208816 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Igbaria, 1993, User acceptance of microcomputer technology: An empirical test, Omega, Vol. 21, 73, 10.1016/0305-0483(93)90040-R · DOI · Paper page
  14. Igbaria, 1989, Microcomputer application: An empirical look at usage, Information & Management, Vol. 16, 187, 10.1016/0378-7206(89)90036-0 · DOI
  15. LaBay, 1981, Exploring the consumer decision process in the adoption of solar energy systems, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 8, 271, 10.1086/208865 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Lachman, 1994, Analyzing cross-national management and organizations: A theoretical framework, Management Science, Vol. 40, 40, 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.40 · DOI
  17. Lee, 1986, Usage patterns and sources of assistance to personal computer Users, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 10, 313, 10.2307/249183 · DOI
  18. Liebenau, 1991, Editorial, European Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 1, 1, 10.1057/ejis.1991.1 · DOI
  19. Raymond, 1985, Organizational characteristics and MIS success in the context of the small business, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 9, 37, 10.2307/249272 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Robey, 1979, User attitudes and management information systems use, Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 22, 527, 10.2307/255742 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Robey, 1978, Factors affecting the success and failure of an information system for product quality, Interfaces, Vol. 8, 70, 10.1287/inte.8.2.70 · DOI
  22. Ross, 1975, Direct, indirect, and spurious effects: Comments on causal analysis of interorganizational relations, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 20, 295
  23. Rozenzweig, 1994, When can management science research be generalized internationally, Management Science, Vol. 40, 28, 10.1287/mnsc.40.1.28 · DOI
  24. Webster, 1992, Microcomputer playfulness: Development of a measure with workplace implications, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 16, 201, 10.2307/249576 · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

See all 664

Metadata

Authors
Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H.
Venue
Information & Management
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-11
Volume
29
Issue
5
Pages
227-238
ISSN
0378-7206 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0
OpenAlex
W2002677052
Cited by
664
References
5
FWCI
16.87
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0
The paper
Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., & Maragahh, H. (1995). Why do individuals use computer technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management. https://doi.org/10.1016/0378-7206(95)00031-0

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.