Erratum
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In loop quantum gravity, basic geometric quantities have been quantized and found to have discrete spectra.
“Basic geometric quantities have been quantized [10][11][12][13][14] and found to have discrete spectra.”
From Loop quantum cosmology: I. Kinematics (2000) · cites this paper as [11]
The area and volume operators of Rovelli and Smolin differ from those of Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators, but for spin networks with generic 4-valent vertices their formulae agree up to constant factors.
“The area and volume operators first introduced by Rovelli and Smolin [56] differ from those later studied by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators [6][7][8][9]33].However, these differences do not arise in situations involving spin networks with generic 4-valent vertices (i.e.those for which no triple of incident edges have linearly dependent tangent vectors).In such situations, their formulae”
From Spin foam models (1998) · cites this paper as [56]
Area and volume operators for triangles and tetrahedra in this picture are closely related to those introduced by Rovelli and Smolin and by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators.
“These operators are closely related to the area and volume operators first introduced by Rovelli and Smolin [56], as well as the slightly different ones studied by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators [6][7][8][9]33].”
From Spin foam models (1998) · cites this paper as [56]
The Dirac algebra is not faithfully represented, but the algebra is non-anomalous in the sense that a consistent quantum theory is obtained.
“(i) As we will see in the next section, the Dirac algebra is indeed not faithfully represented (one could, however, use the arguments of [27] to improve this), but still the algebra is non-anomalous in the sense that we obtain a consistent quantum theory”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of the Hamiltonian constraint of matter quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [27]
The classical limit schemes lim_{ε→0} lim_{δ→0} and (lim_{δ→0})|_{ε=δ} are identical and both give back the classical magnetic Hamiltonian constraint.
“This is justified because the classical limit schemes lim →0 lim δ→0 and (lim δ→0 ) | = (δ), (0)=0 are identical, both give back the classical magnetic Hamiltonian constraint.”
From Quantum spin dynamics (QSD): V. Quantum gravity as the natural regulator of the Hamiltonian constraint of matter quantum field theories (1998) · cites this paper as [27]
The EPRL model uses only simplicial complexes (or cubulations) and the spin-networks defined on their boundaries.
“The EPRL model on the other hand, uses only simplicial complexes (or, recently cubulations [28]) and the spin-networks defined on their boundaries.”
From Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity (2010) · cites this paper as [28]
The LQG result fixes the proportionality constant for area as A_j = 8πħG√j(j+1).
“The LQG result assures us that we can interpret it as a physical quantization and not an artifact of the discretization and fixes the proportionality constant: A j = 8 π ¯ hG √ j ( j +1).”
From Graviton Propagator from Background-Independent Quantum Gravity (2006) · cites this paper as [11]
The quantization of the physical area, with eigenvalues proportional to √j(j+1), is a key result of LQG, reappearing here in the context of the spinfoam models.
“The quantization of the physical area, with eigenvalues proportional to √ j ( j +1) is a key result of LQG [11], reappearing here in the context of the spinfoam models.”
From Graviton Propagator from Background-Independent Quantum Gravity (2006) · cites this paper as [11]
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Background independent quantum gravity: a status report
Ashtekar, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/15/r01 · Cited by 1,951 · see citing works
Black-hole entropy in loop quantum gravity
Meissner, K. A. (2004) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/21/22/015 · Cited by 720 · see citing works
Quantum nature of the big bang: An analytical and numerical investigation
Ashtekar, A., Pawlowski, T., & Singh, P. (2006) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.73.124038 · Cited by 609 · see citing works
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/5/012 · Cited by 416 · see citing works
Baez, J. C. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/7/004 · Cited by 381 · see citing works
Barrett–Crane model from a Boulatov–Ooguri field theory over a homogeneous space
De Pietri, R., Freidel, L., Krasnov, K., & Rovelli, C. (2000) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/s0550-3213(00)00005-5 · Cited by 244 · see citing works
Kinematical Hilbert spaces for fermionic and Higgs quantum field theories
Thiemann, T. (1998) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/15/6/006 · Cited by 184 · see citing works
Spin-foams for all loop quantum gravity
Kamiński, W., Kisielowski, M., & Lewandowski, J. (2010) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/27/9/095006 · Cited by 191 · see citing works
Loop quantum cosmology: I. Kinematics
Bojowald, M. (2000) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/17/6/312 · Cited by 125 · see citing works
Are the spectra of geometrical operators in loop quantum gravity really discrete?
Dittrich, B., & Thiemann, T. (2009) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.3054277 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Quantum-reduced loop gravity: Cosmology
Alesci, E., & Cianfrani, F. (2013) · Physical Review D · doi:10.1103/physrevd.87.083521 · Cited by 90 · see citing works
A left-handed simplicial action for Euclidean general relativity
Reisenberger, M. P. (1997) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/14/7/012 · Cited by 73 · see citing works
Diffeomorphism covariant representations of the holonomy-flux -algebra
Oko w, A., & Lewandowski, J. (2003) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/302 · Cited by 58 · see citing works
BF gravity and the Immirzi parameter
Capovilla, R., Montesinos, M., Prieto, V. A., & Rojas, E. (2001) · Classical and Quantum Gravity · doi:10.1088/0264-9381/18/5/101 · Cited by 55 · see citing works
The perturbative Regge-calculus regime of loop quantum gravity
Bianchi, E., & Modesto, L. (2008) · Nuclear Physics B · doi:10.1016/j.nuclphysb.2007.12.011 · Cited by 34 · see citing works
A combinatorial approach to diffeomorphism invariant quantum gauge theories
Zapata, J. A. (1997) · Journal of Mathematical Physics · doi:10.1063/1.532159 · Cited by 32 · see citing works
- Venue
- Nuclear Physics B
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-12
- Volume
- 456
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 753-754
- ISSN
- 0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W4254859358
- Cited by
- 240
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review