Cited by 240

Erratum

·1995·Nuclear Physics B

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0550-3213(95)00550-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In loop quantum gravity, basic geometric quantities have been quantized and found to have discrete spectra.

    “Basic geometric quantities have been quantized [10][11][12][13][14] and found to have discrete spectra.”

    From Loop quantum cosmology: I. Kinematics (2000) · cites this paper as [11]

  • The area and volume operators of Rovelli and Smolin differ from those of Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators, but for spin networks with generic 4-valent vertices their formulae agree up to constant factors.

    “The area and volume operators first introduced by Rovelli and Smolin [56] differ from those later studied by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators [6][7][8][9]33].However, these differences do not arise in situations involving spin networks with generic 4-valent vertices (i.e.those for which no triple of incident edges have linearly dependent tangent vectors).In such situations, their formulae”

    From Spin foam models (1998) · cites this paper as [56]

  • Area and volume operators for triangles and tetrahedra in this picture are closely related to those introduced by Rovelli and Smolin and by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators.

    “These operators are closely related to the area and volume operators first introduced by Rovelli and Smolin [56], as well as the slightly different ones studied by Ashtekar, Lewandowski and collaborators [6][7][8][9]33].”

    From Spin foam models (1998) · cites this paper as [56]

  • The Dirac algebra is not faithfully represented, but the algebra is non-anomalous in the sense that a consistent quantum theory is obtained.

    “(i) As we will see in the next section, the Dirac algebra is indeed not faithfully represented (one could, however, use the arguments of [27] to improve this), but still the algebra is non-anomalous in the sense that we obtain a consistent quantum theory”
  • The classical limit schemes lim_{ε→0} lim_{δ→0} and (lim_{δ→0})|_{ε=δ} are identical and both give back the classical magnetic Hamiltonian constraint.

    “This is justified because the classical limit schemes lim →0 lim δ→0 and (lim δ→0 ) | = (δ), (0)=0 are identical, both give back the classical magnetic Hamiltonian constraint.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Venue
Nuclear Physics B
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-12
Volume
456
Issue
3
Pages
753-754
ISSN
0550-3213 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4254859358
Cited by
240
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 8 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 9 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 4 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 9 · 2012: 11
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Nuclear Physics B (publishedVersion)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review