Cited by 58Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity TheoriesAdvanced Operator Algebra ResearchRelativity and Gravitational Theory

Diffeomorphism covariant representations of the holonomy-flux -algebra

Open access
Oko w, Andrzej, Lewandowski, Jerzy·2003·Classical and Quantum Gravity

Abstract

Recently, Sahlmann (2002 Preprint gr-qc/0207111) proposed a new, algebraic point of view on the loop quantization. He brought up the issue of a ⋆-algebra underlying that framework, studied the algebra consisting of the fluxes and holonomies and characterized its representations. We define the diffeomorphism covariance of a representation of the Sahlmann algebra and study the diffeomorphism covariant representations. We prove they are all given by Sahlmann's decomposition into the cyclic representations of the subalgebra of the holonomies by using a single state only. The state corresponds to the natural measure defined on the space of the generalized connections. This result is a generalization of Sahlmann's result (2002 Preprint gr-qc/0207112) concerning the U (1) case.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1088/0264-9381/20/16/302

Cites

42 of 42 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The only measure satisfying the condition (88) coincides with the measure defined on A by the state ω0 described in the example.

    “As it was shown in [15] the only measure satisfying the above condition coincides with the measure defined on A by the state ω 0 described in the example.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 43 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. Rovelli C and Smolin L 1995 Nucl. Phys. B 456 753 (erratum) (Preprint gr-qc/9411005) · arXiv
  2. Rovelli C 1998 Loop quantum gravity Living Rev. Rel. 1 1 (Preprint gr-qc/9710008) · arXiv
  3. Thiemann T 1998 QSD V: quantum gravity as the natural regulator of matter quantum field theories Class. Quantum Grav. 15 1281-314 (Preprint gr-qc/9705019) · arXiv

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Oko w, A., & Lewandowski, J.
Affiliations
Pennsylvania State University (US)
Venue
Classical and Quantum Gravity
Published
2003-07-22
Volume
20
Issue
16
Pages
3543-3567
ISSN
  • 0264-9381 (ISSN-L)
  • 1361-6382
OpenAlex
W2020174113
Cited by
58
References
43
Citations by year
2016: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
9.62
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Classical and Quantum Gravity (publishedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University) (submittedVersion)
  • CERN Document Server (European Organization for Nuclear Research) (submittedVersion)
  • arXiv (Cornell University)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Noncommutative and Quantum Gravity Theories
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Advanced Operator Algebra Research
  • Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Astronomy and Astrophysics › Relativity and Gravitational Theory
Keywords
general covariance, loop quantum gravity, cyclic representations, generalized connections, quantum connection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review