Social uncertainty and interdependence: A study of resource allocation decisions in groups
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Teams characterized by information elaboration may need fewer rounds of performance and process feedback to instigate learning.
“Finally, teams characterized by information elaboration may need fewer rounds of performance and process feedback to instigate learning (Sniezek, May, & Sawyer, 1990), which leaders could observe.”
From Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams. (2020) · cites this paper as Sniezek, May, & Sawyer, 1990
Cites
The Framing of Decisions and the Psychology of Choice
Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1981) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.7455683 · Cited by 17,604 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
The emerging conceptualization of groups as information processors.
Hinsz, V. B., Tindale, R. S., & Vollrath, D. A. (1997) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.43 · Cited by 1,428 · see citing works
Uncertainty management by means of fairness judgments
van den Bos, K., & Lind, E. A. (2002) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(02)80003-x · Cited by 913 · see citing works
Leading diversity: Towards a theory of functional leadership in diverse teams.
Homan, A. C., Gündemir, S., Buengeler, C., & van Kleef, G. A. (2020) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/apl0000482 · Cited by 180 · see citing works
Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review
Gabelica, C., Bossche, P. V. D., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W. (2012) · Educational Research Review · doi:10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003 · Cited by 146 · see citing works
- Authors
- Sniezek, J. A., May, D. R., & Sawyer, J. E.
- Affiliations
- University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
- Texas A&M University (US)
- Corresponding author
- Sniezek, Janet A
- ORCID
- Sawyer, John E
- Venue
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1990-08
- Volume
- 46
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 155-180
- ISSN
- 0749-5978 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2063484855
- Cited by
- 55
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 5 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 4 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 6.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Safety Research › Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › General Decision Sciences › Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics
- Keywords
- social uncertainty, interdependence, resource allocation, group decision making, self-interested behavior, behavioral commitment, feedback, expectations, individual versus group interests, expectancy-value theory, group commitment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
