Cited by 146Student Assessment and FeedbackInnovative Teaching and Learning MethodsTeam Dynamics and Performance

Feedback, a powerful lever in teams: A review

Gabelica, Catherine, Bossche, Piet Van den, Segers, Mien, Gijselaers, Wim·2012·Educational Research Review

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.edurev.2011.11.003

Cites

106 of 106 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • There are few studies on the impact of the provision of feedback to teams of individuals and the outcomes are variable.

    “There are few studies on the impact of the provision of feedback to teams of individuals and the outcomes are variable, as described in a review by Gabelica et al. [89].”
  • Feedback about and during the process of teamwork was more reliably effective than feedback about performance given to the team or to individuals within the team.

    “Feedback about and during the process of teamwork was more reliably effective than feedback about performance given to the team or to individuals within the team.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gabelica, C., Bossche, P. V. D., Segers, M., & Gijselaers, W.
Affiliations
  • Maastricht University (NL)
  • University of Antwerp (BE)
Corresponding author
Gabelica, Catherine
Venue
Educational Research Review
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-06
Volume
7
Issue
2
Pages
123-144
ISSN
1747-938X (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2027867024
Cited by
146
References
106
Citations by year
2026: 11 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 11 · 2017: 11 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 11 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 2
FWCI
26.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational Research Review (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (publishedVersion)
  • Research Publications (Maastricht University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Team Dynamics and Performance
Keywords
feedback, team performance, performance feedback, process feedback, knowledge of results, feedback effectiveness, organizational teams, feedback interventions

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review