Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 250

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine by an immunoaffinity chromatography-monoclonal antibody-based ELISA

Open access
Yin, Baoyun, Whyatt, Robin M., Perera, Frederica P., Randall, Mary C., Cooper, Thomas B., Santella, Regina M.·1995·Free Radical Biology and Medicine

Abstract

The postulated importance of oxidative damage to DNA in aging and age-related degenerative pathologies such as cancer has prompted efforts to develop sensitive quantitation methods. 8-Hydroxy-2'-deoxyguanosine (8-OHdG) is a widely used marker for oxidative damage to DNA. To develop an immunoassay for quantitation of 8-OHdG, two monoclonal antibodies have been developed and characterized by competitive enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Antibody 1F7 has 50% inhibition at 5 pmol 8-OHdG and 1 x 10(5) pmol dG, while antibody 1F11 has 50% inhibition at 2.5 pmol 8-OHdG and 2000 pmol dG. Both antisera crossreact with guanosine and several structurally related derivatives, including 6- and 8-mercaptoguanosine, 8-bromoguanosine, 8-methylguanine, and 7-methylguanosine. Immunoaffinity columns were prepared with antibody 1F7, which exhibits higher selectivity than 1F11, to isolate 8-OHdG from DNA hydrolyzates followed by ELISA quantitation with antibody 1F11. This method allows the analysis of approximately one 8-OHdG/10(5) dG using 100 micrograms DNA. To validate the assay, DNA extracted from human placental tissues were assayed by both ELISA and HPLC with electrochemical detection. Values by both methods correlated well (r = 0.87, p < 0.001), but the levels determined by ELISA were approximately sixfold higher than those determined by HPLC. This may be due to oligonucleotides detected by the ELISA but not the HPLC method or crossreactivity with other damaged bases present in the immunoaffinity purified material. Placental samples from current smokers had significantly higher 8-OHdG by ELISA than those from nonsmokers (p < 0.05). The method of immunoaffinity purification combined with ELISA quantitation has sufficient sensitivity for detecting 8-OHdG in human DNA samples. Although absolute values are higher than those determined by HPLC, the method provides a good alternative to the HPLC-EC method for monitoring relative oxidative damage in molecular epidemiological studies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0891-5849(95)00003-g

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 250

Metadata

Authors
Yin, B., Whyatt, R. M., Perera, F. P., Randall, M. C., Cooper, T. B., & Santella, R. M.
Venue
Free Radical Biology and Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-06
Volume
18
Issue
6
Pages
1023-1032
ISSN
0891-5849 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995202749
Cited by
250
References
2
FWCI
2.39
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
hybrid

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine by an immunoaffinity chromatography-monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/0891-5849(95)00003-g
The paper
Yin, B., Whyatt, R. M., Perera, F. P., Randall, M. C., Cooper, T. B., & Santella, R. M. (1995). Determination of 8-hydroxydeoxyguanosine by an immunoaffinity chromatography-monoclonal antibody-based ELISA. Free Radical Biology and Medicine. https://doi.org/10.1016/0891-5849(95)00003-g

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.