Methodologic guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized control trials in health care from the potsdam consultation on meta-analysis
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Stroup, D. F. (2000) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.283.15.2008 · Cited by 20,623 · see citing works
Moher, D., Cook, D. J., Eastwood, S., Olkin, I., Rennie, D., & Stroup, D. F. (1999) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(99)04149-5 · Cited by 4,826 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Handbook of Research Synthesis and Meta-Analysis
(2019) · doi:10.7758/9781610448864 · Cited by 4,553 · see citing works
Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials
Jüni, P., Altman, D. G., & Egger, M. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7303.42 · Cited by 3,309 · see citing works
Moher, D., Schulz, K. F., & Altman, D. G. (2001) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-1-2 · Cited by 2,755 · see citing works
Updated Method Guidelines for Systematic Reviews in the Cochrane Collaboration Back Review Group
van Tulder, M., Furlan, A., Bombardier, C., & Bouter, L. (2003) · Spine · doi:10.1097/01.brs.0000065484.95996.af · Cited by 2,180 · see citing works
Systematic Reviews: Synthesis of Best Evidence for Clinical Decisions
Cook, D. J., Mulrow, C. D., & Haynes, R. B. (1997) · Annals of Internal Medicine · doi:10.7326/0003-4819-126-5-199703010-00006 · Cited by 2,184 · see citing works
Self-citationThe Hazards of Scoring the Quality of Clinical Trials for Meta-analysis
Jüni, P. (1999) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.282.11.1054 · Cited by 1,981 · see citing works
Egger, M., Jüni, P., Bartlett, C., Holenstein, F., & Sterne, J. (2003) · Health Technology Assessment · doi:10.3310/hta7010 · Cited by 1,181 · see citing works
Using meta ethnography to synthesise qualitative research: a worked example
Britten, N., Campbell, R., Pope, C., Donovan, J., Morgan, M., & Pill, R. (2002) · Journal of Health Services Research & Policy · doi:10.1258/135581902320432732 · Cited by 1,110 · see citing works
Direction and impact of language bias in meta-analyses of controlled trials: empirical study
Jüni, P., Holenstein, F., Sterne, J., Bartlett, C., & Egger, M. (2002) · International Journal of Epidemiology · doi:10.1093/ije/31.1.115 · Cited by 892 · see citing works
Racine, M., Tousignant-Laflamme, Y., Kloda, L. A., Dion, D., Dupuis, G., & Choinière, M. (2012) · Pain · doi:10.1016/j.pain.2011.11.025 · Cited by 691 · see citing works
Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Practice Facilitation Within Primary Care Settings
Baskerville, N. B., Liddy, C., & Hogg, W. (2012) · The Annals of Family Medicine · doi:10.1370/afm.1312 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Reporting standards for research in psychology: why do we need them? What might they be?
APA Publications and Communications Board Working Group on Journal Article Reporting Standards (2008) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.63.9.839 · Cited by 571 · see citing works
Ray, J. G., & Laskin, C. A. (1999) · Placenta · doi:10.1053/plac.1999.0417 · Cited by 401 · see citing works
Ospina, M. B., Krebs Seida, J., Clark, B., Karkhaneh, M., Hartling, L., Tjosvold, L., Vandermeer, B., & Smith, V. (2008) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0003755 · Cited by 366 · see citing works
Kho, M. E., Duffett, M., Willison, D. J., Cook, D. J., & Brouwers, M. C. (2009) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.b866 · Cited by 269 · see citing works
Gagnier, J. J., Moher, D., Boon, H., Beyene, J., & Bombardier, C. (2012) · BMC Medical Research Methodology · doi:10.1186/1471-2288-12-111 · Cited by 222 · see citing works
Manchikanti, L. (2009) · Pain Physician · doi:10.36076/ppj.2009/12/819 · Cited by 168 · see citing works
Arneja, S., McConkey, M. O., Mulpuri, K., Chin, P., Gilbart, M. K., Regan, W. D., & Leith, J. M. (2009) · Arthroscopy · doi:10.1016/j.arthro.2008.07.010 · Cited by 100 · see citing works
Strategies for Coping with LGBT Discrimination at Work: a Systematic Literature Review
Mara, L.-C., Ginieis, M., & Brunet-Icart, I. (2021) · Sexuality Research and Social Policy · doi:10.1007/s13178-020-00462-w · Cited by 84 · see citing works
The reporting quality of meta-analyses improves: a random sampling study
Wen, J., Ren, Y., Wang, L., Li, Y., Liu, Y., Zhou, M., Liu, P., Ye, L., Li, Y., & Tian, W. (2008) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2007.10.008 · Cited by 84 · see citing works
Current methods for meta-analysis
Schulze, R. (2007) · Zeitschrift für Psychologie / Journal of Psychology · doi:10.1027/0044-3409.215.2.90 · Cited by 79 · see citing works
Quality of systematic reviews in pediatric oncology – A systematic review
Lundh, A., Knijnenburg, S. L., Jørgensen, A. W., van Dalen, E. C., & Kremer, L. C. M. (2009) · Cancer Treatment Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.08.010 · Cited by 78 · see citing works
Slobogean, G. P., Verma, A., Giustini, D., Slobogean, B. L., & Mulpuri, K. (2009) · Journal of Clinical Epidemiology · doi:10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.01.013 · Cited by 62 · see citing works
Guidelines for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses
Rubio-Aparicio, M., Sánchez-Meca, J., Marín-Martínez, F., & López-López, J. A. (2018) · Anales de Psicología · doi:10.6018/analesps.34.2.320131 · Cited by 56 · see citing works
Quality assessment of meta-analyses of RCTs of pharmacotherapy in major depressive disorder.
Hemels, M. E. H., Vicente, C., Sadri, H., Masson, M. J., & Einarson, T. R. (2004) · Current Medical Research and Opinion · doi:10.1185/030079904125003197 · Cited by 23 · see citing works
Koesters, M., Zhang, Y., Chun, Y., Weinmann, S., Becker, T., & Jin, W. D. (2011) · Journal of Clinical Psychopharmacology · doi:10.1097/jcp.0b013e31820f932a · Cited by 10 · see citing works
Common Funding Sources Among Registered Dental Clinical Trials: A Descriptive Study
P, P., D, P., U, K., P, B., & RP, N. (2026) · Journal of Dental Health and Oral Research · doi:10.46889/jdhor.2026.7124
- Authors
- Cook, D. J., Sackett, D. L., & Spitzer, W. O.
- Affiliations
- McMaster University (CA)
- University of Oxford (GB)
- Corresponding author
- Cook, D.J.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-01
- Volume
- 48
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 167-171
- ISSN
- 0895-4356 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1978868802
- Cited by
- 573
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 12 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 16 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 13 · 2015: 16 · 2014: 23 · 2013: 13 · 2012: 14
- FWCI
- 29.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Clinical Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty › Meta-analysis and systematic reviews
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Delphi Technique in Research
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Clinical practice guidelines implementation
- Keywords
- systematic review methodology, randomized controlled trials, meta-analysis, health care research, review guidelines
- MeSH terms
- Data Interpretation, Statistical, Meta-Analysis as Topic, Reproducibility of Results, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review