Cited by 61Schizophrenia research and treatmentPsychiatric care and mental health servicesHealthcare Decision-Making and Restraints

Hospitalization patterns in schizophrenia

Munk-Jørgensen, Povl, Bo Mortensen, Preben, Machón, Ricardo A.·1991·Schizophrenia Research

Abstract

All first admitted patients in 1972 from a catchment area of 582,000 inhabitants aged 15 years or more who were diagnosed as schizophrenic at least once from 1972 until September 1983 (n = 53) were followed-up on average 13 years after first admission. About 20% of the cohort was hospitalized on any given day throughout the length of the follow-up period. The duration of hospitalization decreased from a mean of 8.2 months for the first admission to 1.7 months for the tenth or later admission. The readmission risk increased as a function of the number of previous admissions. Patients with income from occupation or from grants for education had shorter duration of first in-patient period. If the patients were diagnosed as schizophrenics already during the first hospitalization the risk for prolonged duration of the first in-patient period was increased but the readmission risk diminished. Furthermore, readmission risk after the first discharge was diminished by own income and by out-patient treatment and increased by low social status. High proportion of follow-up time in hospital (greater than or equal to 30%) was correlated to affective flattening present at first admission. Of the cohorts' total number of admissions (n = 493) 12% were involuntary. Involuntary admissions were more frequent in the first half of the follow-up period and were correlated to a previous involuntary admission.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0920-9964(91)90004-b

Cites

34 of 34 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The association with involuntary readmission possibly indicates less therapeutic engagement.

    “By contrast, two studies found that overall readmission was not higher following involuntary admission (69,70) although there was an association with involuntary readmission, possibly indicating less therapeutic engagement (71–75).”
  • There was an association with involuntary readmission.

    “By contrast, two studies found that overall readmission was not higher following involuntary admission (69,70) although there was an association with involuntary readmission, possibly indicating less therapeutic engagement (71–75).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Munk-Jørgensen, P., Bo Mortensen, P., & Machón, R. A.
Affiliations
Loyola Marymount University (US)
Venue
Schizophrenia Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1991-01
Volume
4
Issue
1
Pages
1-9
ISSN
0920-9964 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W17599641
Cited by
61
References
34
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
2.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Schizophrenia Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
Keywords
schizophrenia, hospitalization patterns
MeSH terms
Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Denmark, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Hospitalization, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Length of Stay, Male, Patient Readmission, Rehabilitation, Vocational, Schizophrenia, Schizophrenic Psychology, Social Adjustment, Social Environment, Socioeconomic Factors, Cohort Studies, Incidence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review