Cited by 390

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Rat liver and kidney contain high densities of σ1 and σ2 receptors: characterization by ligand binding and photoaffinity labeling

Hellewell, Susan B., Bruce, Ashley, Feinstein, Glen, Orringer, Jeffrey, Williams, Wanda, Bowen, Wayne D.·1994·European Journal of Pharmacology: Molecular Pharmacology

Abstract

Rat liver and kidney were investigated for the presence of sigma (sigma) receptor subtypes by radioligand binding with three highly selective sigma probes and by photoaffinity labeling using [3H]azido-di-o-tolylguanidine ([3H]azido-DTG). [3H](+)-Pentazocine, a highly selective sigma 1 probe, bound to sites in liver membranes with Kd = 7.5 nM and Bmax3 = 2929 fmol/mg protein. [3H](+)-Pentazocine binding sites in kidney had Kd = 23.3 nM and Bmax = 229 fmol/mg protein. [3H]1,3-Di-o-tolylguanidine ([3H]DTG) and [3H](+)-3-(3-hydroxyphenyl)-N-(1-propyl)piperidine ([3H](+)-3-PPP) label both sigma 1 and sigma 2 receptors. Parameters for [3H]DTG in the liver were Kd = 17.9 nM and Bmax = 11,895 fmol/mg protein. Similar parameters were observed for [3H](+)-3-PPP, Kd = 51.9 nM and Bmax = 11,070 fmol/mg protein. [3H]DTG bound to rat kidney with Kd = 45.8 nM and Bmax = 1190 fmol/mg protein. The observation that either [3H]DTG or [3H](+)-3-PPP and [3H](+)-3-PPP labeled a higher number of sites relative to [3H](+)-pentazocine suggested that liver and kidney contain both subtypes of sigma receptor. This was confirmed by competition studies vs. [3H](+)-pentazocine and [3H]DTG (in the presence of dextrallorphan to mask sigma 1 sites). In both tissues, [3H](+)-pentazocine labeled sites with high affinity for haloperidol and enantioselectivity for (+)-benzomorphans over (-)-benzomorphans. [3H]DTG + dextrallorphan labeled sites in both tissues which also had high affinity for haloperidol, but whic…

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/0922-4106(94)90115-5

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • S2R activity was initially localized to a ~20 kDa membrane protein and first thought to be progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1).

    “S2R activity was initially localized to a ~20 kDa membrane protein [51,52] and first thought to be progesterone receptor membrane component 1 (PGRMC1), based on mass spectrophotometry identification following an immunoaffinity pull down with an irreversible S2R ligand binder WC-11, physiochemical properties, and pharmacological evidence [53,54].”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 37

  1. Bowen, 1989, Evidence for a multi-site model of the rat brain sigma receptor, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 163, 309, 10.1016/0014-2999(89)90200-8 · DOI
  2. Bowen, 1992, Sigma-1 and sigma-2 binding sites of rat kidney, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 18, 456
  3. Bowen, 1993, [3H](+)-Pentazocine: a potent and highly selective benzomorphan-based probe for sigma-1 receptors, Mol. Neuropharmacol., 3, 117
  4. Bruce, 1990, Characterization of “sigma-like” sites in rat liver membranes: further evidence for sigma-1 and sigma-2 sites, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 16, 370
  5. Cheng, 1973, Relationship between the inhibition constant (Ki) and the concentration of inhibitor which causes 50 percent inhibition (150) of an enzymatic reaction, Biochem. Pharmacol., 22, 3099, 10.1016/0006-2952(73)90196-2 · DOI · Paper page
  6. de Costa, 1989, Synthesis and evaluation of optically pure [3H](+)-pentazocine, a highly potent and selective radioligand for sigma receptors, FEBS Lett., 251, 53, 10.1016/0014-5793(89)81427-9 · DOI
  7. de Costa, 1992, Synthesis, characterization and biological evaluation of a novel class of N-(arylethyl)-N-alkyl-2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)ethylamines: structural requirements and binding affinity at the sigma receptor, J. Med. Chem., 35, 38, 10.1021/jm00079a004 · DOI
  8. Di Paolo, 1991, N-Substituted derivatives of normetazocine: differentiation of sigma-1 and sigma-2 receptors, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 17, 814
  9. Ferris, 1991, Sigma receptors: from molecule to man, J. Neurochem., 57, 729, 10.1111/j.1471-4159.1991.tb08213.x · DOI
  10. He, 1993, Synthesis and binding characteristics of potential SPECT imaging agents for sigma-1 and sigma-2 binding sites, J. Med. Chem., 36, 566, 10.1021/jm00057a006 · DOI
  11. Hellewell, 1990, A sigma-like binding site in rat pheochromocytoma (PC12) cells: decreased affinity for (+)-benzomorphans and lower molecular weight suggest a different sigma receptor form from that of guinea pig brain, Brain Res., 527, 244, 10.1016/0006-8993(90)91143-5 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Itzhak, 1990, Sigma binding sites in the brain: an emerging concept for multiple sites and their relevance for psychiatric disorders, Life Sci., 47, 1073, 10.1016/0024-3205(90)90165-N · DOI
  13. Itzhak, 1991, Binding of sigma-ligands to C57BL/6 mouse brain membranes: effects of monoamine oxidase inhibitors and subcellular distribution studies suggest the existence of sigma-receptor subtypes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 257, 141
  14. Jewell, 1993, Strain differences in rat brain and liver sigma binding: lack of cytochrome P450-2D1 involvement, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 243, 249, 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90182-H · DOI
  15. Karbon, 1991, [3H]DTG and [3H](+)-3-PPP label pharmacologically distinct sigma binding sites in guinea pig brain membranes, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 193, 21, 10.1016/0014-2999(91)90195-V · DOI
  16. Klein, 1991, SKF 525-A and cytochrome P-450 ligands inhibit with high affinity the binding of [3H]dextromethorphan and sigma ligands to guinea pig brain, Life Sci., 48, 543, 10.1016/0024-3205(91)90469-R · DOI
  17. Knight, 1991, The subcellular distribution and pharmacology of the sigma recognition site in the guinea-pig brain and liver, Mol. Neuropharmacol., 1, 71
  18. Laemmli, 1970, Cleavage of structural proteins during the assembly of the head of bacteriophage T4, Nature (London), 227, 680, 10.1038/227680a0 · DOI · Paper page
  19. Lowry, 1951, Protein measurement with the Folin phenol reagent, J. Biol. Chem., 193, 265, 10.1016/S0021-9258(19)52451-6 · DOI
  20. McCann, 1990, Haloperidol-sensitive (+)-[3H]SKF-10,047 binding sites (sigma sites) exhibit a unique distribution in rat brain subcellular fractions, Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect., 188, 211, 10.1016/0922-4106(90)90004-H · DOI
  21. McCann, 1991, Solubilization and characterization of haloperidol-sensitive (+)-[3H]SKF 10,047 binding sites (sigma sites_ from rat liver membranes, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 257, 547
  22. Monnet, 1993, The cytochromes P-450 are not involved in the modulation of the N-methyl-d-aspartate response by sigma ligands in the rat CA3 dorsal hippocampus, Synapse, 13, 30, 10.1002/syn.890130105 · DOI
  23. Musacchio, 1988, High affinity dextromethophan sites in guinea pig brain: further charcharacterization and allosteric interactions, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 247, 424
  24. Masacchio, 1989, Dextromethorphan and sigma ligands: common sites but diverse effects, Life Sci., 45, 1721, 10.1016/0024-3205(89)90510-9 · DOI
  25. Quirino, 1992, A proposal for the classification of sigma binding sites, Trends Pharmacol. Sci., 13, 85, 10.1016/0165-6147(92)90030-A · DOI
  26. Radesca, 1991, Synthesis and receptor binding of enantiometric N-substituted cis-N-[2-(1-pyrrolidinyl)cyclohexylamines as high affinity sigma ligands, J. Med. Chem., 34, 3058, 10.1021/jm00114a015 · DOI
  27. Ross, 1991, Heterogeneous binding of sigma radioligands in the rat brain and liver: possible relationship to subforms of cytochrome P-450, Pharmacol. Toxicol., 68, 293, 10.1111/j.1600-0773.1991.tb01242.x · DOI
  28. Rothman, 1991, Labeling by [3H]1,3-di(2-tolyl)guanidine of two high affinity binding sites in guinea pig brain: evidence for allosteric regulation by calcium channel antagonists and pseudoallosteric modulation by sigma ligands, Mol. Pharmacol., 39, 222
  29. Samovilova, 1988, (+)-[3H]SKF 10,047 binding sites in rat liver, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 147, 259, 10.1016/0014-2999(88)90784-4 · DOI
  30. Su, 1991, Sigma receptors: putative links between nervous, endocrine, and immune systems, Eur. J. Biochem., 200, 633, 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16226.x · DOI
  31. Tam, 1992, Is the rat brain sigma receptor the same as cytochrome P-450? Haloperidol down-regulates sigma receptors but not cytochrome P-450, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 18, 547
  32. Vilner, 1991, Characterization of [3H]DTG and [3H](+)-3-PPP binding sites of NB41A3 neuroblastoma, C6 glioma, and NG108-15 hybrid cells, Soc. Neurosci. Abstr., 17, 593
  33. Walker, 1990, Sigma receptors: biology and function, Pharmacol. Rev., 42, 355
  34. Walker, 1993, A comparison of (−)-deoxybenzomorphans devoid of opiate activity with their dextrorotatory phenolic counterparts suggests role of sigma-2 receptors in motor function, Eur. J. Pharmacol., 231, 61, 10.1016/0014-2999(93)90684-A · DOI
  35. Weber, 1986, 1,3-Di((2-[5-3H]tolyl)guanidine: a selective ligand that labels sigma that receptors for psychotomimetic opiates and antipsychotic drugs, 83, 8784
  36. Wu, 1991, Electrophysiological and binding studies on intact NCB-202 cells suggest presence of low affinity sigma receptor, J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 257, 351
  37. Zhou, 1991, Computer-assisted modeling of multiple dextromethorphan and sigma binding sites in guinea pig brain, Eur. J. Pharmacol. Mol. Pharmacol. Sect., 206, 261, 10.1016/0922-4106(91)90108-T · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Hellewell, S. B., Bruce, A., Feinstein, G., Orringer, J., Williams, W., & Bowen, W. D.
Venue
European Journal of Pharmacology: Molecular Pharmacology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1994-06
Volume
268
Issue
1
Pages
9-18
ISSN
0922-4106
Cited by
390
References
1
Language
en

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review