Cited by 167Survey Methodology and NonresponseStatistical Methods in EpidemiologyGlobal Cancer Incidence and Screening

Response rates among control subjects in case-control studies☆

Slattery, Martha L., Edwards, Sandra L., Caan, Bette J., Kerber, Richard A., Potter, John D.·1995·Annals of Epidemiology

Abstract

Response rates are an important component of epidemiologic research. The purposes of this study are (a) to evaluate how response rates are defined and calculated for control subjects in epidemiologic case-control studies, and (b) to explore factors that may impact response in epidemiologic studies. Our results show that the method of control subject selection has an impact on study response. Gender of respondent does not appear to impact response rates. However, response rates are generally worse for individuals less than 45 years old. Methods used to calculate response have a great impact on "response rate"; therefore, it is important for researchers to define exactly what the reported response rates represent and how they are derived so that data can be interpreted appropriately.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/1047-2797(94)00113-8

Cites

14 of 14 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Slattery, M. L., Edwards, S. L., Caan, B. J., Kerber, R. A., & Potter, J. D.
Affiliations
  • University of Utah (US)
  • Kaiser Permanente (US)
  • University of Minnesota (US)
Corresponding author
Slattery, Martha L.
Venue
Annals of Epidemiology
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-05
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
245-249
ISSN
1047-2797 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2124048591
Cited by
167
References
14
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 5
FWCI
27.33
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Annals of Epidemiology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Cancer Institute (CA 48998)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Survey Methodology and Nonresponse
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Statistics and Probability › Statistical Methods in Epidemiology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Keywords
response rate, case-control study, control subjects, respondent characteristics
MeSH terms
Adult, Age Factors, Aged, California, Colonic Neoplasms, Cooperative Behavior, Epidemiologic Methods, Female, Health Maintenance Organizations, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Male, Middle Aged, Minnesota, Sex Factors, United States, Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S., Utah, Case-Control Studies, Sample Size, Patient Selection

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review