The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
On fire: Charismatic leadership and levels of analysis
Open accessAbstract
Charisma is a fire that ignites followers' energy, commitment, and performance. Charisma resides not in a leader, nor in a follower, but in the relationship between a leader who has charismatic qualities and a follower who is open to charisma, within a charisma-conducive environment. When a leader shares charismatic relationships with all of his or her subordinates, charisma is homogeneous—a raging fire. When a leader shares charismatic relationships with one or a limited number of his or her subordinates, charisma is not homogeneous but variable—pockets of fire. We explore the determinants and consequences of the extent of homogeneity of charisma within a group of followers, discuss the practical implications of our theoretical propositions, and pose new questions for research.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Levels issues in theory development, data collection and analysis
Klein, K. J., Dansereau, F., & Hall, R. J. (1994) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258703 · Cited by 1,607
Self-citation
Cited by
(2000) · Cited by 2,531
Toward a theory of spiritual leadership
Fry, L. W. (2003) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2003.09.001 · Cited by 2,522
Distributed leadership as a unit of analysis
Gronn, P. (2002) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(02)00120-0 · Cited by 2,059
An evaluation of conceptual weaknesses in transformational and charismatic leadership theories
Yukl, G. (1999) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/s1048-9843(99)00013-2 · Cited by 2,058
Relational leadership theory: exploring the social processes of leadership and organizing
Uhl-Bien, M. (2006) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2006.10.007 · Cited by 1,973
Metadata
- Authors
- Klein, K. J., & House, R. J.
- Venue
- The Leadership Quarterly
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 183-198
- ISSN
- 1048-9843 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2088491272
- Cited by
- 436
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 19.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.