The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”
Bruffee, K. A. (1984) · College English · doi:10.2307/376924 · Cited by 1,016
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Allaei, 1990, Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms, The Writing Instructor, 10, 19
- Bruffee, 1973, Collaborative learning: Some practical models, College English, 34, 634, 10.2307/375331 · DOI
- Carson, 1994, Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5 · DOI
- DiPardo, 1988, Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions, Review of Educational Research, 58, 119, 10.3102/00346543058002119 · doi:10.3102/00346543058002119 · Paper page
- Faigley, 1981, Analyzing revision, College Composition and Communication, 32, 401, 10.2307/356602 · doi:10.2307/356602 · Paper page
- Flower, 1981, A cognitive process theory of writing, College Composition and Communication, 32, 365, 10.2307/356600 · doi:10.2307/356600 · Paper page
- Nelson, 1992, An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7 · DOI
- Nelson, 1993, Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?, TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135, 10.2307/3586965 · DOI
- Nystrand, 1989, A social-interactive model of writing, Written Communication, 6, 66, 10.1177/0741088389006001005 · DOI · Paper page
- Zamel, 1987, Recent research on writing pedagogy, TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697, 10.2307/3586990 · DOI
Cited by
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
Metadata
- Authors
- Connor, U., & Asenavage, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-276
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030134541
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
