The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Peer response groups in ESL writing classes: How much impact on revision?
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Collaborative learning and the “conversation of mankind”
Bruffee, K. A. (1984) · College English · doi:10.2307/376924 · Cited by 1,016
Research works printed but not linked: 10
- Allaei, 1990, Exploring the dynamics of cross-cultural collaboration in writing classrooms, The Writing Instructor, 10, 19
- Bruffee, 1973, Collaborative learning: Some practical models, College English, 34, 634, 10.2307/375331 · DOI
- Carson, 1994, Writing groups: Cross-cultural issues, Journal of Second Language Writing, 3, 17, 10.1016/1060-3743(94)90003-5 · DOI
- DiPardo, 1988, Peer response groups in the writing classroom: Theoretic foundations and new directions, Review of Educational Research, 58, 119, 10.3102/00346543058002119 · doi:10.3102/00346543058002119 · Paper page
- Faigley, 1981, Analyzing revision, College Composition and Communication, 32, 401, 10.2307/356602 · doi:10.2307/356602 · Paper page
- Flower, 1981, A cognitive process theory of writing, College Composition and Communication, 32, 365, 10.2307/356600 · doi:10.2307/356600 · Paper page
- Nelson, 1992, An L2 writing group: Task and social dimensions, Journal of Second Language Writing, 1, 171, 10.1016/1060-3743(92)90002-7 · DOI
- Nelson, 1993, Peer response groups: Do L2 writers use peer comments in revising their drafts?, TESOL Quarterly, 27, 135, 10.2307/3586965 · DOI
- Nystrand, 1989, A social-interactive model of writing, Written Communication, 6, 66, 10.1177/0741088389006001005 · DOI · Paper page
- Zamel, 1987, Recent research on writing pedagogy, TESOL Quarterly, 21, 697, 10.2307/3586990 · DOI
Cited by
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
The effects of trained peer review on EFL students’ revision types and writing quality
Min, H.-T. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.01.003 · Cited by 482
The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers
Hyland, F. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90017-0 · Cited by 456
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405
ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8 · Cited by 298
ESL writers and feedback: giving more autonomy to students
Hyland, F. (2000) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1177/136216880000400103 · Cited by 296
Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775 · Cited by 222
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175
Diab, N. M. (2011) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2011.08.001 · Cited by 90
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2022) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541 · Cited by 63
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530 · Cited by 51
“This finding accords with previous studies in CALL and general writing research which reported that self-revision plays a primary role in student revision (Connor & Asenavage, 1994; Tuzi, 2004).”
BackgroundResultThe Effects of Online Feedback Training on Students’ Text Revision
Yang, Y.-F., & Meng, W.-T. (2013) · Language Learning & Technology · doi:10.64152/10125/44331 · Cited by 44
Yu, S., Lee, I., & Mak, P. (2016) · The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher · doi:10.1007/s40299-015-0262-1 · Cited by 41
Fostering Revision of Argumentative Writing through Structured Peer Assessment
Tsai, Y.-C., & Chuang, M.-T. (2013) · Perceptual and Motor Skills · doi:10.2466/10.23.pms.116.1.210-221 · Cited by 36
Mawlawi Diab, N. (2016) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.12.014 · Cited by 34
Japanese L2 learners’ translanguaging practice in written peer feedback
Kim, S., & Chang, C.-H. (2022) · International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism · doi:10.1080/13670050.2020.1760201 · Cited by 25
The Effects of the Peer Feedback Process on Reviewers’ Own Writing
Wakabayashi, R. (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v6n9p177 · Cited by 14
Gao, J., & Chen, W. (2025) · Language Awareness · doi:10.1080/09658416.2024.2321894 · Cited by 11
Yoshizawa, S., Terano, T., & Yoshikawa, A. (2012) · IEEE Transactions on Professional Communication · doi:10.1109/tpc.2011.2172833 · Cited by 11
(2019) · UTS ePRESS (University of Technology Sydney) · Cited by 5
Engaging in a collaborative space: exploring the substance and impact of peer review conversations
Lineback, J. E., & Holbrook, E. (2024) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2023.2290978 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- Connor, U., & Asenavage, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1994-09
- Volume
- 3
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 257-276
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2030134541
- Cited by
- 306
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 23.99
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Licence
- www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.