The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They found that written feedback motivates learners to revise their drafts (Saito, 1994;Zhang, 1995), and enhances their writing (Ferris, 1997(Ferris, , 2010)).”
From A comparative study of the effect of teacher’s group and individual feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ learning of speech acts in apology letter writing (2020) · cites this paper as Zhang, 1995
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 8,017
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
Smith, H., & Ferguson, G. A. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283699 · Cited by 2,221
Mayher, J. S., & Elbow, P. H. (1975) · The English Journal · doi:10.2307/814919 · Cited by 1,199
Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences.
Bassler, J. F., Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286625 · Cited by 981
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
McNemar, Q. (1967) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/009024 · Cited by 843
Teaching the Universe of Discourse
Hundley, J. S., & Moffett, J. (1970) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/354610 · Cited by 719
Writing Expertise and Second‐Language Proficiency*
Cumming, A. (1989) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x · Cited by 641
Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning
Zamel, V. (1982) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586792 · Cited by 564
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Perdue, 1984, Writing as an act of power: Basic writing pedagogy as social practice, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45
- Silva, T. (in press). Differences in ESL and native speaker writing. In J. Butler & C. Severino (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings. New York: Modern Language Association.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Items 401–402 of 402
Feedback in Writing Instruction: The Role of Teachers and Peers
Kurihara, N. (2026) · Springer eBooks · doi:10.1007/978-981-95-6163-6_12
Factoren van invloed op feedbackvoorkeuren van studenten bij samenwerken
van Oosten, E. (2013) · Utrecht University Repository (Utrecht University)
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Shuqiang
- ORCID
- Zhang, Shuqiang
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-222
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990215606
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 47.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, ESL writing, emotional factors, teacher feedback, learner preferences, writing process, composition instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review