The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“They found that written feedback motivates learners to revise their drafts (Saito, 1994;Zhang, 1995), and enhances their writing (Ferris, 1997(Ferris, , 2010)).”
From A comparative study of the effect of teacher’s group and individual feedback on Iranian EFL learners’ learning of speech acts in apology letter writing (2020) · cites this paper as Zhang, 1995
Citations
Cites
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences
Guitton, H., & Siegel, S. (1958) · Revue économique · doi:10.2307/3498751 · Cited by 35,279
Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences.
Whitfield, J. W., & Siegel, S. (1957) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (General) · doi:10.2307/2342828 · Cited by 8,017
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
Smith, H., & Ferguson, G. A. (1967) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2283699 · Cited by 2,221
Mayher, J. S., & Elbow, P. H. (1975) · The English Journal · doi:10.2307/814919 · Cited by 1,199
Nonparametric and Distribution-Free Methods for the Social Sciences.
Bassler, J. F., Marascuilo, L. A., & McSweeney, M. (1978) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2286625 · Cited by 981
Toward an Understanding of the Distinct Nature of L2 Writing: The ESL Research and Its Implications
Silva, T. (1993) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3587400 · Cited by 860
Statistical Analysis in Psychology and Education.
McNemar, Q. (1967) · Contemporary Psychology · doi:10.1037/009024 · Cited by 843
Teaching the Universe of Discourse
Hundley, J. S., & Moffett, J. (1970) · College Composition and Communication · doi:10.2307/354610 · Cited by 719
Writing Expertise and Second‐Language Proficiency*
Cumming, A. (1989) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/j.1467-1770.1989.tb00592.x · Cited by 641
Writing: The Process of Discovering Meaning
Zamel, V. (1982) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586792 · Cited by 564
Research works printed but not linked: 2
- Perdue, 1984, Writing as an act of power: Basic writing pedagogy as social practice, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45
- Silva, T. (in press). Differences in ESL and native speaker writing. In J. Butler & C. Severino (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings. New York: Modern Language Association.
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Hyland, K. (2003) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511667251 · Cited by 1,219
Feedback on second language students' writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2006) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444806003399 · Cited by 1,048
Hyland, K. (2001) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.38-5145 · Cited by 1,044
A comparative study of peer and teacher feedback in a Chinese EFL writing class
Yang, M., Badger, R., & Yu, Z. (2006) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2006.09.004 · Cited by 703
Do secondary L2 writers benefit from peer comments?
Tsui, A. B. M., & Ng, M. (2000) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(00)00022-9 · Cited by 648
The influence of teacher commentary on student revision
Ferris, D. R. (1997) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3588049 · Cited by 618
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on student writing
Paulus, T. M. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80117-9 · Cited by 522
Activating the ZPD: Mutual Scaffolding in L2 Peer Revision
de Guerrero, M. C. M., & Villamil, O. S. (2000) · Modern Language Journal · doi:10.1111/0026-7902.00052 · Cited by 504
The effects of trained peer response on ESL students' revision types and writing quality
Berg, E. C. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80115-5 · Cited by 485
The impact of teacher written feedback on individual writers
Hyland, F. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90017-0 · Cited by 456
A Synthesis of Research on Second Language Writing in English
Leki, I., Cumming, A. H., & Silva, T. J. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203930250 · Cited by 421
Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7 · Cited by 383
Zhu, W. Y., & Mitchell, D. A. (2012) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.1002/tesq.22 · Cited by 373
Strijbos, J.-W., Narciss, S., & Dünnebier, K. (2009) · Learning and Instruction · doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2009.08.008 · Cited by 399
Peer Response in Second Language Writing Classrooms
Liu, J., & Edwards, J. G. H. (2002) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.8952 · Cited by 354
Student reactions to teacher feedback in two Hong Kong secondary classrooms
Lee, I. (2008) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2007.12.001 · Cited by 344
ESL students' perceptions of effectiveness in peer response groups
Nelson, G. L., & Carson, J. G. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90010-8 · Cited by 298
Peer Assessment between Students in Colleges and Universities
Topping, K. (1998) · Review of Educational Research · doi:10.2307/1170598 · Cited by 2,173
Zhao, H. (2010) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2010.01.002 · Cited by 273
The impact of e-feedback on the revisions of L2 writers in an academic writing course
Tuzi, F. (2004) · Computers & composition/Computers and composition · doi:10.1016/j.compcom.2004.02.003 · Cited by 267
Peer Feedback in Second Language Writing
Yu, S., & Lee, I. (2016) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.1017/s0261444816000161 · Cited by 322
Twenty-five years of research on oral and written corrective feedback in System
Li, S., & Vuono, A. (2019) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2019.05.006 · Cited by 271
Teacher commentary on student writing: Descriptions & implications
Ferris, D. R., Pezone, S., Tade, C. R., & Tinti, S. (1997) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(97)90032-1 · Cited by 207
Exploring student engagement with peer feedback on L2 writing
Fan, Y., & Xu, J. (2020) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2020.100775 · Cited by 222
“I feel disappointed”: EFL university students’ emotional responses towards teacher written feedback
Mahfoodh, O. H. A. (2016) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2016.07.001 · Cited by 236
Hu, G., & Lam, S. T. E. (2010) · Instructional Science · doi:10.1007/s11251-008-9086-1 · Cited by 182
Connecting Reading & Writing in Second Language Writing Instruction
Hirvela, A. (2004) · University of Michigan Press eBooks · doi:10.3998/mpub.23736 · Cited by 177
The Effectiveness of feedback for L1-English and L2-writing development: a meta-analysis.
Biber, D., Nekrasova, T., & Horn, B. (2011) · ETS Research Report Series · doi:10.1002/j.2333-8504.2011.tb02241.x · Cited by 175
L2 output, reformulation and noticing: Implications for IL development
Adams, R. (2003) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168803lr127oa · Cited by 179
Wegerif, R., & Laat, D. (2010) · Routledge eBooks · doi:10.4324/9780203847817 · Cited by 176
Feedback on student writing: taking the middle path
Jacobs, G. M., Curtis, A., Braine, G., & Huang, S.-Y. (1998) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(98)90019-4 · Cited by 163
An inventory of peer assessment diversity
Gielen, S., Dochy, F., & Onghena, P. (2011) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602930903221444 · Cited by 160
Characteristics and user acceptance of peer rating in EFL writing classrooms
Saito, H., & Fujita, T. (2004) · Language Teaching Research · doi:10.1191/1362168804lr133oa · Cited by 156
Zhang, L. J., & Rahimi, M. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2014.01.012 · Cited by 185
Supporting Second Language Writing Using Multimodal Feedback
Elola, I., & Oskoz, A. (2016) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12183 · Cited by 152
The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy
Ruegg, R. (2014) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.958190 · Cited by 170
Face-to-face and Computer-mediated Peer Review in EFL Writing
Ho, M.-C., & Savignon, S. J. (2007) · CALICO Journal · doi:10.1558/cj.v24i2.269-290 · Cited by 140
Students’ perceptions of rubric-referenced peer feedback on EFL writing: A longitudinal inquiry
Wang, W. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2013.11.008 · Cited by 142
Contexts and Issues in Feedback on L2 Writing
Hyland, K., & Hyland, F. (2019) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108635547.003 · Cited by 137
Situating ESL Writing in a Cross-Disciplinary Context
Matsuda, P. K. (1998) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088398015001004 · Cited by 105
Broadening the Perspective of Mainstream Composition Studies
Silva, T. J., Leki, I., & Carson, J. G. (1997) · Written Communication · doi:10.1177/0741088397014003004 · Cited by 104
Student preferences vis-à-vis teacher feedback in university EFL writing classes in Japan
Elwood, J. A., & Bode, J. (2014) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2013.12.023 · Cited by 100
Responding to L2 Students in College Writing Classes: Teacher Perspectives
Ferris, D. R., BROWN, J., Liu, H., & STINE, M. E. A. (2011) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.5054/tq.2011.247706 · Cited by 99
Using learning analytics to understand student perceptions of peer feedback
Misiejuk, K., Wasson, B., & Egelandsdal, K. (2021) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2020.106658 · Cited by 98
Two Decades of Research in L2 Peer Review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2016) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2016.08.01.03 · Cited by 96
Pellerone, M. (2021) · European Journal of Investigation in Health Psychology and Education · doi:10.3390/ejihpe11020035 · Cited by 109
Which do students prefer to evaluate their essays: peers or computer program
Lai, Y. (2010) · British Journal of Educational Technology · doi:10.1111/j.1467-8535.2009.00959.x · Cited by 92
Lee, M.-K. (2015) · System · doi:10.1016/j.system.2015.08.003 · Cited by 101
Writing in a foreign language: teaching and learning
O’Brien, T. (2004) · Language Teaching · doi:10.1017/s0261444804002113 · Cited by 86
Kamimura, T. (2006) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v23i2.53 · Cited by 84
Exchanging ideas with peers in network-based classrooms: An aid or a pain?
Sengupta, S. (2001) · Language learning & technology · doi:10.64152/10125/25114 · Cited by 84
Writing Error: A Review of Interlingual and Intralingual Interference in EFL Context
Kaweera, C. (2013) · English Language Teaching · doi:10.5539/elt.v6n7p9 · Cited by 82
Cao, Z., Yu, S., & Huang, J. (2019) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2019.08.001 · Cited by 83
Tang, G. M. (1999) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v16i2.716 · Cited by 97
Student performance and attitudes under formative evaluation by teacher, self and peer evaluators
Özoğul, G., & Sullivan, H. J. (2007) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-007-9052-7 · Cited by 83
Preferences for interactional feedback: differences between learners and teachers
Kaivanpanah, S., Alavi, S. M., & Sepehrinia, S. (2012) · Language Learning Journal · doi:10.1080/09571736.2012.705571 · Cited by 85
Jahin, J. H. (2012) · The Australian journal of teacher education · doi:10.14221/ajte.2012v37n11.3 · Cited by 73
Grami, G. M. A. (2010) · OpenGrey (Institut de l'Information Scientifique et Technique) · Cited by 73
Teacher, self and peer evaluation of lesson plans written by preservice teachers
Özoğul, G., Olina, Z., & Sullivan, H. J. (2006) · Educational Technology Research and Development · doi:10.1007/s11423-006-9012-7 · Cited by 77
Yastıbaş, G. Ç., & YASTIBAŞ, A. E. (2015) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.07.543 · Cited by 70
The Use of Models as a Form of Written Feedback to Secondary School Pupils of English
Esteban, N. M., & de Larios, J. R. (2010) · International Journal of English Studies · doi:10.6018/ijes/2010/2/119241 · Cited by 72
Teacher vs. Peer Oral Corrective Feedback in the German Language Classroom
Sippel, L., & Jackson, C. N. (2015) · Foreign Language Annals · doi:10.1111/flan.12164 · Cited by 68
Two portfolio systems: EFL students’ perceptions of writing ability, text improvement, and feedback
Lam, R. (2013) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2012.10.003 · Cited by 65
Thoughts on some recent evidence concerning the affective advantage of peer feedback
Zhang, S. (1999) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(99)80119-2 · Cited by 62
Self-citationPromoting self-regulated learning through portfolio assessment: testimony and recommendations
Lam, R. (2013) · Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/02602938.2013.862211 · Cited by 60
Chinese Efl Students' Attitudes To Peer Feedback and Peer Assessment in an Extended Pairwork Setting
Roskams, T. (1999) · RELC Journal · doi:10.1177/003368829903000105 · Cited by 60
Zeevy-Solovey, O. (2024) · Technology in Language Teaching & Learning · doi:10.29140/tltl.v6n3.1482 · Cited by 86
Anonymity in Blended Learning: Who Would You like to Be?
Miyazoe, T., & Anderson, T. D. (2011) · Educational Technology & Society · Cited by 58
The effect of blog peer review and teacher feedback on the revisions of EFL writers
Wu, W.-S. (2006) · doi:10.6372/jefll.200607.0125 · Cited by 59
Teacher Written Feedback for L2 Learners' Writing Development
Srıchanyachon, N. (2012) · Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences Studies · Cited by 56
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., & Gai, X. (2022) · Higher Education Research & Development · doi:10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541 · Cited by 63
Comer, D. K., Clark, C. R., & Canelas, D. A. (2014) · The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning · doi:10.19173/irrodl.v15i5.1850 · Cited by 56
Computer-mediated and face-to-face peer feedback: student feedback and revision in EFL writing
Pham, H. T. P. (2022) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2020.1868530 · Cited by 51
“Earlier studies report that peer feedback does not help student revision, tends to yield superficial comments (e.g. praise), and is less valued in comparison to teacher feedback (Carson & Nelson, 1996; Ferris, 1997; Zhang, 1995).”
BackgroundResultA collaborative writing approach: Methodology and student assessment
Mulligan, C., & Garofalo, R. (2011) · The Language Teacher · doi:10.37546/jalttlt35.3-1 · Cited by 50
Berndt, M., Strijbos, J.-W., & Fischer, F. (2017) · European Journal of Psychology of Education · doi:10.1007/s10212-017-0343-z · Cited by 54
Exploring e-learners’ perceptions of net-based peer-reviewed English writing
Ge, Z.-G. (2011) · International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning · doi:10.1007/s11412-010-9103-7 · Cited by 47
Teacher modeling on EFL reviewers’ audience-aware feedback and affectivity in L2 peer review
Chang, C. Y.-H. (2015) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2015.04.001 · Cited by 52
Arslan, R. Ş. (2013) · The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology · Cited by 47
Strijbos, J.-W., Ochoa, T. A., Sluijsmans, D. M. A., Segers, M. S. R., & Tillema, H. H. (2009) · Cognitive and Emotional Processes in Web-Based Education · doi:10.4018/978-1-60566-392-0.ch018 · Cited by 48
Li, H. H., Zhang, L. J., & Parr, J. M. (2020) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2020.570565 · Cited by 43
Institutional Forces and L2 Writing Feedback in Higher Education
Séror, J. (2009) · Canadian Modern Language Review/ La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes · doi:10.3138/cmlr.66.2.203 · Cited by 41
A Case Study of Peer Feedback in a Chinese EFL Writing Classroom
Mei, T., & Qian, Y. (2010) · Cited by 41
Metacognitive Instruction for Peer Review Interaction in L2 Writing
Bui, G., & Kong, A. (2019) · Journal of Writing Research · doi:10.17239/jowr-2019.11.02.05 · Cited by 48
Ge, Z.-G. (2019) · Computer Assisted Language Learning · doi:10.1080/09588221.2019.1677721 · Cited by 46
Ruwe, T., & Mayweg-Paus, E. (2023) · Computers and Education Artificial Intelligence · doi:10.1016/j.caeai.2023.100189 · Cited by 65
Séror, J. (2011) · DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) · Cited by 41
Cen, Y., & Zheng, Y. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100802 · Cited by 54
Алексеевна, М. Л., Shutaya, N. K., Юрьевна, С. Е., Ивановна, Л. О., & Aleshina, L. N. (2016) · International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature · doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.5n.5p.158 · Cited by 43
CURRENT APPROACHES TO RESEARCHING SECOND LANGUAGE LEARNER PROCESSES
Wigglesworth, G. (2005) · Annual Review of Applied Linguistics · doi:10.1017/s026719050500005x · Cited by 40
An Analysis of Written Feedback on ESL Students’ Writing
Tee, K. P. L. (2014) · Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.01.1437 · Cited by 48
The science of teaching science
Mostafa, T., Echazarra, A., & Guillou, H. (2018) · OECD education working papers · doi:10.1787/f5bd9e57-en · Cited by 52
Using peer feedback in a Master's programme: a multiple case study
Poverjuc, O., Brooks, V., & Wray, D. (2011) · Teaching in Higher Education · doi:10.1080/13562517.2011.641008 · Cited by 40
Wu, W., Huang, J., Han, C., & Zhang, J. (2022) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2022.101140 · Cited by 45
Zhang, X., & McEneaney, J. E. (2019) · Reading Research Quarterly · doi:10.1002/rrq.259 · Cited by 40
Using Asynchronous Instructional Audio Feedback in Online Environments: A Mixed Methods Study
Olesova, L. A., Richardson, J. C., Weasenforth, D., & Meloni, C. F. (2011) · Cited by 32
Learners’ perceptions and performance under peer versus teacher corrective feedback conditions
Mahvelati, E. H. (2021) · Studies In Educational Evaluation · doi:10.1016/j.stueduc.2021.100995 · Cited by 59
Comparing Peer Review and Self-Review as Ways to Improve College Students' Writing
Covill, A. E. (2010) · Journal of Literacy Research · doi:10.1080/10862961003796207 · Cited by 45
Alkhatib, N. (2015) · Open Access at Essex (University of Essex) · Cited by 32
Identities and Beliefs in ESL Writing: From Product to Processes
Li, X. (2007) · TESL Canada Journal · doi:10.18806/tesl.v25i1.107 · Cited by 31
Liaqat, A., Munteanu, C., & Epp, C. D. (2020) · International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education · doi:10.1007/s40593-020-00204-4 · Cited by 41
Metadata
- Authors
- Zhang, S.
- Affiliations
- University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
- Corresponding author
- Zhang, Shuqiang
- ORCID
- Zhang, Shuqiang
- Venue
- Journal of Second Language Writing
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 1995-09
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 209-222
- ISSN
- 1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W1990215606
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 48
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
- FWCI
- 47.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Keywords
- peer feedback, ESL writing, emotional factors, teacher feedback, learner preferences, writing process, composition instruction
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review