CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 405EFL/ESL Teaching and LearningStudent Assessment and FeedbackSecond Language Acquisition and Learning

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 48 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class

Zhang, Shuqiang·1995·Journal of Second Language Writing
DOI 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1

Cites

47 of 47 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Perdue, 1984, Writing as an act of power: Basic writing pedagogy as social practice, Dissertation Abstracts International, 45
  2. Silva, T. (in press). Differences in ESL and native speaker writing. In J. Butler & C. Severino (Eds.), Writing in multicultural settings. New York: Modern Language Association.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 405

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Zhang, S.
Affiliations
University of Hawaiʻi at Mānoa (US)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Shuqiang
ORCID
Zhang, Shuqiang
Venue
Journal of Second Language Writing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
1995-09
Volume
4
Issue
3
Pages
209-222
ISSN
1060-3743 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1
OpenAlex
W1990215606
Cited by
405
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 8 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 26 · 2020: 18 · 2019: 15 · 2018: 14 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 21 · 2015: 21 · 2014: 30 · 2013: 27 · 2012: 24
FWCI
47.42
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
Journal of Second Language Writing (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
  • Social Sciences › Education › Student Assessment and Feedback
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
Keywords
peer feedback, ESL writing, emotional factors, teacher feedback, learner preferences, writing process, composition instruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review