Writing Expertise and Second‐Language Proficiency*
Abstract
The second‐language writing performance of 23 young adults on three composition tasks was assessed in relation to their writing expertise and second‐language proficiency. Both factors accounted for large proportions of variance in the qualities of written texts and problem‐solving behaviors in the second language. But the factors exerted independent effects, suggesting they are psychologically distinct. Writing expertise proved to relate to: qualities of discourse organization and content in the compositions produced; attention to complex aspects of writing during decision making; problem‐solving behaviors involving heuristic searches; and well‐differentiated control strategies. Second‐language proficiency proved to be an additive factor, enhancing the overall quality of writing produced, and interacting with the attention that participants devoted to aspects of their writing. But second‐language proficiency did not visibly affect the processes of composing. In all analyses, more cognitively demanding argument and summary tasks produced significantly different behaviors from a less cognitively demanding letter task.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Writing involves much more conscious analysis and attention to complex aspects of writing during decision making, problem-solving behaviors involving heuristic searches, and well-differentiated control strategies.
“it involves much more conscious analysis and attention “to complex aspects of writing during decision making; problem-solving behaviors involving heuristic searches; and well-differentiated control strategies” (Cumming, 1989, p. 81).”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Cumming, 1989
Writing is considerably slower than speech.
“On the whole, writing is considerably slower than speech”
From Effects of Availability, Contingency, and Formulaicity on the Accuracy of English Grammatical Morphemes in Second Language Writing (2022) · cites this paper as Cumming, 1989
Cites
Fodor, J. A. (1983) · doi:10.7551/mitpress/4737.001.0001 · Cited by 7,734 · see citing works
Zamel, V. (1985) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586773 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
The Composing Processes of Advanced ESL Students: Six Case Studies
Zamel, V. (1983) · TESOL Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3586647 · Cited by 712 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Collaborative writing: Product, process, and students’ reflections
Storch, N. (2005) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/j.jslw.2005.05.002 · Cited by 1,052 · see citing works
Reexamining the affective advantage of peer feedback in the ESL writing class
Zhang, S. (1995) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/1060-3743(95)90010-1 · Cited by 405 · see citing works
Exploring the role of noticing in a three-stage second language writing task
Qi, D. S., & Lapkin, S. (2001) · Journal of Second Language Writing · doi:10.1016/s1060-3743(01)00046-7 · Cited by 383 · see citing works
Students' use of writing strategies and their English writing achievements in Taiwan
Chien, S.-C. (2012) · Asia Pacific Journal of Education · doi:10.1080/02188791.2012.655240 · Cited by 104 · see citing works
10. A focus on mode: Patterns of interaction in face-to-face and computer-mediated contexts
Rouhshad, A., & Storch, N. (2016) · Language Learning & Language Teaching · doi:10.1075/lllt.45.11rou · Cited by 81 · see citing works
Linguistic complexity as the predictor of EFL independent and integrated writing quality
Zhang, Y., & Ouyang, J. (2023) · Assessing Writing · doi:10.1016/j.asw.2023.100727 · Cited by 28 · see citing works
Murakami, A., & Ellis, N. C. (2022) · Language Learning · doi:10.1111/lang.12500 · Cited by 26 · see citing works
- Authors
- Cumming, A.
- Affiliations
- University of British Columbia (CA)
- Corresponding author
- Cumming, Alister
- Venue
- Language Learning
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1989-03
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 81-135
- ISSN
- 0023-8333 (ISSN-L)
- 1467-9922
- OpenAlex
- W2009143026
- Cited by
- 641
- References
- 3
- Citations by year
- 2026: 10 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 39 · 2021: 24 · 2020: 24 · 2019: 21 · 2018: 26 · 2017: 26 · 2016: 31 · 2015: 41 · 2014: 26 · 2013: 37 · 2012: 27
- FWCI
- 62.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Language Learning (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Language and Linguistics › EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Developmental and Educational Psychology › Second Language Acquisition and Learning
- Social Sciences › Education › Writing and Handwriting Education
- Keywords
- writing expertise, second language proficiency, second language writing, writing process, problem-solving behavior, heuristics, control strategy, discourse structure, argumentative writing, summary writing, letter writing, cognitive load, young adults
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review