Negative Interdependence and Prejudice: Whence the Affect?
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Ingroup favoritism is reflected by beliefs on group morality and stereotyping of outgroup members as less peaceful, trustworthy, friendly, and honest than the ingroup.
“The ingroup favoritism is reflected by the beliefs on the group morality and the stereotyping of the outgroup members in the sense that 'we' are more peaceful, trustworthy, friendly, and honest than 'they' [7, 8, 14].”
From Closed-mindedness and insulation in groupthink: their effects and the devil’s advocacy as a preventive measure (2021) · cites this paper as [14]
Cites
Social psychology of intergroup relations
Tajfel, H. (1982) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.ps.33.020182.000245 · Cited by 7,949 · see citing works
Cognitive, social, and physiological determinants of emotional state.
Schachter, S., & Singer, J. (1962) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0046234 · Cited by 6,223 · see citing works
Stereotypes and prejudice: Their automatic and controlled components
Devine, P. G. (1989) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5 · Cited by 5,673 · see citing works
Toward a self‐evaluation maintenance model of social behavior
Tesser, A. (1988) · Advances in Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(08)60227-0 · Cited by 1,878 · see citing works
Stigma, staring, and discomfort: A novel-stimulus hypothesis
Langer, E. J., Fiske, S., Taylor, S. E., & Chanowitz, B. (1976) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(76)90077-9 · Cited by 215 · see citing works
Self-citation
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Universal dimensions of social cognition: warmth and competence
Fiske, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2007) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2006.11.005 · Cited by 4,567 · see citing works
Self-citationEsses, V. M., Jackson, L. M., & Armstrong, T. L. (1998) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1998.tb01244.x · Cited by 833 · see citing works
Akhmad, M., Chang, S., & Deguchi, H. (2021) · Journal of Computational Social Science · doi:10.1007/s42001-020-00083-8 · Cited by 18 · see citing works
“The ingroup favoritism is reflected by the beliefs on the group morality and the stereotyping of the outgroup members in the sense that ‘we’ are more peaceful, trustworthy, friendly, and honest than ‘they’ [7, 8, 14].”
Background
- Authors
- FISKE, S. T., & RUSCHER, J. B.
- Affiliations
- University of Massachusetts Amherst (US)
- Tulane University (US)
- Venue
- Affect, Cognition and Stereotyping
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1993
- Pages
- 239-268
- OpenAlex
- W2499182873
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 8 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 5
- FWCI
- 18.73
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social Power and Status Dynamics
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Death Anxiety and Social Exclusion
- Keywords
- prejudice, outgroup members, negative affect, stereotyping, intergroup relations
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
