Cited by 106Algal biology and biofuel productionCoagulation and Flocculation StudiesAquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics

Harvesting of microalgae: Overview of process options and their strengths and drawbacks

Open access
Muylaert, K., Bastiaens, L., Vandamme, D., Gouveia, L.·2017·Microalgae-Based Biofuels and Bioproducts

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-101023-5.00005-4

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Muylaert, K., Bastiaens, L., Vandamme, D., & Gouveia, L.
Affiliations
  • KU Leuven (BE)
  • Flemish Institute for Technological Research (BE)
  • National Laboratory of Energy and Geology (PT)
Venue
Microalgae-Based Biofuels and Bioproducts
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
113-132
OpenAlex
W2700130516
Cited by
106
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 17 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 21 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 2
FWCI
15.94
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
  • Lirias (acceptedVersion, other-oa)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Energy › Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment › Algal biology and biofuel production
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Water Science and Technology › Coagulation and Flocculation Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Environmental Chemistry › Aquatic Ecosystems and Phytoplankton Dynamics
Keywords
microalgae harvesting, preconcentration, biomass quality, water reuse, water footprint, biofuels, nutraceuticals

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review