Cited by 26Thermochemical Biomass Conversion ProcessesCatalysis and Hydrodesulfurization StudiesPetroleum Processing and Analysis

Hydrofaction™ of forestry residues to drop-in renewable transportation fuels

Jensen, C.U., Guerrero, J.K.R., Karatzos, S., Olofsson, G., Iversen, S.B.·2018·Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction for Energy Applications

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-08-101029-7.00009-6

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jensen, C. U., Guerrero, J. K. R., Karatzos, S., Olofsson, G., & Iversen, S. B.
Venue
Direct Thermochemical Liquefaction for Energy Applications
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2018
Pages
319-345
OpenAlex
W2777579277
Cited by
26
References
19
Citations by year
2025: 3 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1
FWCI
6.01
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Biomedical Engineering › Thermochemical Biomass Conversion Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Mechanical Engineering › Catalysis and Hydrodesulfurization Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Petroleum Processing and Analysis
Keywords
forest residues, marine fuel, hydrotreating, NiMo/Al2O3 catalyst, deoxygenation, hydrogenation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review