The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The Private and Social Value of Information and the Reward to Inventive Activity
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Optimal contracts and competitive markets with costly state verification
Townsend, R. M. (1979) · Journal of Economic Theory · doi:10.1016/0022-0531(79)90031-0 · Cited by 3,204
Acquisti, A., Taylor, C., & Wagman, L. (2016) · Journal of Economic Literature · doi:10.1257/jel.54.2.442 · Cited by 1,283
Harhoff, D., Henkel, J., & von Hippel, E. (2003) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/s0048-7333(03)00061-1 · Cited by 772
Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”
Teece, D. J. (2006) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009 · Cited by 733
The market for information and the origin of financial intermediation
Allen, F. (1990) · Journal of Financial Intermediation · doi:10.1016/1042-9573(90)90006-2 · Cited by 412
Information Disclosure as a Matching Mechanism: Theory and Evidence from a Field Experiment
Tadelis, S., & Zettelmeyer, F. (2015) · American Economic Review · doi:10.1257/aer.20110753 · Cited by 124
The Role of Government in the Market for Electric Vehicles: Evidence from China
Li, S., Zhu, X., Ma, Y., Zhang, F., & Zhou, H. (2022) · Journal of Policy Analysis and Management · doi:10.1002/pam.22362 · Cited by 108
Thesmar, D., Sraer, D., Pinheiro, L., Dadson, N., Veliche, R., & Greenberg, P. (2019) · PharmacoEconomics · doi:10.1007/s40273-019-00777-6 · Cited by 91
Could gambling save science? Encouraging an honest consensus
Hanson, R. (1995) · Social Epistemology · doi:10.1080/02691729508578768 · Cited by 82
Metadata
- Authors
- HIRSHLEIFER, J.
- Venue
- Uncertainty in Economics
- Publisher
- Elsevier
- Published
- 1978
- Volume
- 61
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 541-556
- OpenAlex
- W1536411649
- Cited by
- 1,571
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 26.19
- Type
- book chapter
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.