Cited by 733Innovation and Knowledge ManagementBusiness Strategies and InnovationIntellectual Property and Patents

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reflections on “Profiting from Innovation”

Teece, David J.·2006·Research Policy

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.respol.2006.09.009

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Business models are required to create value with innovations.

    “The aforementioned proposition that business models are required to create value with innovations (Chesbrough, 2010;Chesbrough & Rosenbloom, 2002;Teece, 2006) is specified by linking the concepts of sustainability innovation, business model, and business cases for sustainability (Figure 3).”
  • From a Teecian perspective, financial capital can be seen as a complementary resource if it has to be acquired from third parties.

    “From a Teecian perspective, financial capital can be seen as a complementary resource if it has to be acquired from third parties (Teece, 2006(Teece, , 2010)).”
  • Teece (2006), reflecting on his PFI theory, acknowledges the importance of business models for the acquisition of complementary assets but does not connect business models as devices for acquiring complementary assets with the public policies providing them.

    “Teece (2006), reflecting on his PFI theory, acknowledges the importance of business models for the acquisition of complementary assets but does not make a connection between business models as devices that help in acquiring complementary assets and the public policies providing them.”
  • Sometimes the only way to capitalize on knowledge is to start a firm and build the necessary complementary assets.

    “Sometimes the only way to capitalize on knowledge is to start a firm and build the necessary complementary assets (Teece, 1986b, 2006b).”
  • Some ownership and control over complementary assets is likely to be needed to assist the MNE in the appropriation of value needed to support continued investment.

    “Some ownership and control over complementary assets is likely to be needed to assist the MNE in the appropriation of value needed to support continued investment (Teece, 1986b, 2006b).”

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 26

  1. Abernathy, 1978, Patterns of industrial innovation, Technology Review, 80, 40
  2. Arthur, 1989, Competing technologies, increasing returns, and lock in by historical events, The Economic Journal, 116, 10.2307/2234208 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Chatterjee, 1991, The link between resources and type of diversification: theory and evidence, Strategic Management Journal, 12, 33, 10.1002/smj.4250120104 · DOI
  4. Chesbrough, 2002, The role of the business model in capturing value from innovation: Evidence from Xerox Corporation's technology, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 529, 10.1093/icc/11.3.529 · DOI
  5. David, 1985, Clio and the economics of qwerty, American Economic Review, 75, 332
  6. Grindley, 1997, Managing intellectual capital: licensing and cross-licensing in electronics, California Management Review, 39, 2, 10.2307/41165885 · DOI
  7. Hartman, 1993, Assessing market power in regimes of rapid technological change, Industrial and Corporate Change, 2, 317, 10.1093/icc/2.1.317 · DOI
  8. Helfat, 1997, Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 339, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199705)18:5<339::AID-SMJ883>3.0.CO;2-7 · DOI
  9. Helfat, 2000, Product sequencing: coevolution of knowledge, capabilities, and products, Strategic Management Journal, 21, 961, 10.1002/1097-0266(200010/11)21:10/11<961::AID-SMJ132>3.0.CO;2-E · DOI
  10. Helfat, 2002, The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history, Industrial and Corporate Change, 11, 725, 10.1093/icc/11.4.725 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Hirshleifer, 1971, The private and social value of information and the reward to inventive activity, American Economic Review, 61, 561
  12. Kahneman, 1993, Timid choices and bold forecast, Management Science, 39, 10.1287/mnsc.39.1.17 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Katz, 1994, Systems competition and network effects, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 93, 10.1257/jep.8.2.93 · DOI · Paper page
  14. Klepper, 1990, The evolution of new industries and the determination of market structure, Rand Journal of Economics, 21, 27, 10.2307/2555491 · DOI
  15. Mitchell, 1989, Whether and when? Probability and time of incumbents’ entry into emerging industrial subfields, Administrative Science Quarterly, 34, 208, 10.2307/2989896 · DOI
  16. Scott Morton, 1999, Entry decisions in the generic pharmaceutical industry, The RAND Journal of Economics, 30, 421, 10.2307/2556056 · DOI
  17. Sherry, 2003, Standards setting and antitrust, Minnesota Law Review, 87, 1913
  18. Sherry, 2004, Royalties, evolving patient rights, and the value of innovation, Research Policy, 33, 179, 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00088-X · DOI
  19. Teece, 1981, The market for know-how and the efficient international transfer of technology, The Annals of the Academy of Political and Social Science, 81, 10.1177/000271628145800107 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Teece, 1986, Profiting from technological innovation, Research Policy, 15, 285, 10.1016/0048-7333(86)90027-2 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Teece, 1992, Competition, cooperation, and innovation: organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 18, 1, 10.1016/0167-2681(92)90050-L · DOI
  22. Teece, 1993, The dynamics of industrial capitalism: perspectives on Alfred Chandler's scale and scope (1990), Journal of Economic Literature, 31
  23. Teece, 1997, Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 509, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199708)18:7<509::AID-SMJ882>3.0.CO;2-Z · DOI · Paper page
  24. Tripsas, 2001, Unraveling the process of creative destruction: complementary assets and incumbent survival in the typesetter industry, Strategic Management Journal, 18, 119, 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0266(199707)18:1+<119::AID-SMJ921>3.3.CO;2-S · DOI
  25. Tushman, 1986, Technological discontinuities and organizational environments, Administration Science Quarterly, 31, 439, 10.2307/2392832 · DOI
  26. Utterback, 1993, Innovation, competition, and market structure, Research Policy, 22, 1, 10.1016/0048-7333(93)90030-L · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Teece, D. J.
Affiliations
University of California, Berkeley (US)
Corresponding author
Teece, David J.
Venue
Research Policy
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2006-10
Volume
35
Issue
8
Pages
1131-1146
ISSN
0048-7333 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2031134186
Cited by
733
References
3
Citations by year
2026: 32 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 46 · 2022: 49 · 2021: 58 · 2020: 32 · 2019: 36 · 2018: 47 · 2017: 39 · 2016: 46 · 2015: 36 · 2014: 39 · 2013: 36 · 2012: 34
FWCI
55.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Research Policy (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Innovation and Knowledge Management
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Business Strategies and Innovation
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Management of Technology and Innovation › Intellectual Property and Patents
Keywords
technology commercialization, dynamic capabilities, firm resources, innovation strategy

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review