Cited by 741Radiative Heat Transfer StudiesNumerical methods in inverse problemsHeat Transfer and Numerical Methods

Inverse Radiative Heat Transfer

Modest, Michael F·2013·Radiative Heat Transfer

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-386944-9.50023-6

Cites

105 of 105 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Modest, M. F.
Affiliations
University of California, Merced (US)
Corresponding author
Modest, Michael F
Venue
Radiative Heat Transfer
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2013
Pages
779-802
OpenAlex
W2586138158
Cited by
741
References
105
Citations by year
2026: 61 · 2025: 67 · 2024: 53 · 2023: 86 · 2022: 86 · 2021: 83 · 2020: 82 · 2019: 67 · 2018: 53 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 12 · 2014: 35 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
74.10
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Radiative Heat Transfer Studies
  • Physical Sciences › Mathematics › Mathematical Physics › Numerical methods in inverse problems
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Computational Mechanics › Heat Transfer and Numerical Methods
Keywords
radiation intensity, radiative heat flux, radiative properties, temperature field reconstruction

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review