Cited by 74Virus-based gene therapy researchRNA Interference and Gene DeliveryBarrier Structure and Function Studies

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 215 of the 216 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Clinical Applications Involving CNS Gene Transfer

Open access

Abstract

Diseases of the central nervous system (CNS) have traditionally been the most difficult to treat by traditional pharmacological methods, due mostly to the blood-brain barrier and the difficulties associated with repeated drug administration targeting the CNS. Viral vector gene transfer represents a way to permanently provide a therapeutic protein within the nervous system after a single administration, whether this be a gene replacement strategy for an inherited disorder or a disease-modifying protein for a disease such as Parkinson's. Gene therapy approaches for CNS disorders has evolved considerably over the last two decades. Although a breakthrough treatment has remained elusive, current strategies are now considerably safer and potentially much more effective. This chapter will explore the past, current, and future status of CNS gene therapy, focusing on clinical trials utilizing adeno-associated virus and lentiviral vectors.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-12-800149-3.00002-0

Cites

215 of 215 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 216 references

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Van Bogaert, 1949, Sur une idiote familiale avec degenerescence sponglieuse de neuraxe (note preliminaire), Acta Neurologica Belgica, 49, 572

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Kantor, B., McCown, T., Leone, P., & Gray, S. J.
Affiliations
  • University of South Carolina (US)
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Rowan University (US)
Corresponding author
Gray, Steven J.
Venue
Advances in Genetics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2014
Volume
87
Pages
71-124
ISSN
0065-2660 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2214048374
Cited by
74
References
216
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 10 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 1
FWCI
19.65
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Advances in genetics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (P30NS045892, R01NS087175)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Barrier Structure and Function Studies
Keywords
central nervous system gene therapy, adeno-associated virus vectors, lentiviral vectors, blood-brain barrier, gene replacement therapy, Parkinson's disease, disease-modifying therapy, clinical trials
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Central Nervous System Diseases, Genetic Vectors, Humans, Genetic Therapy, Lentivirus

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review