Cited by 17Probiotics and Fermented FoodsConsumer Attitudes and Food LabelingAgricultural safety and regulations

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 19 of the 20 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Legislation of probiotic foods and supplements

Chieffi, Daniele, Fanelli, Francesca, Fusco, Vincenzina·2022·Probiotics for Human Nutrition in Health and Disease

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-323-89908-6.00013-3

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Of the more than 400 health claims evaluated under Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, only one has been authorized: the claim that live yogurt cultures improve lactose digestion, attributable to Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, provided they are present at a minimum level of 10^8 CFU/g.

    “To date, of the more than 400 health claims evaluated under Article 13(1) of Regulation (EC) No 1924/2006, only one has been authorized (European Commission, 2006) [56]: the claim that live yogurt cultures improve lactose digestion, attributable to the starter microorganisms Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus and Streptococcus thermophilus, provided they are present at a minimum level of”

    From Current Concepts in Probiotic Safety and Efficacy (2026) · cites this paper as [58]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 20 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 4

  1. CIRS (Chemical Inspection and Regulation Service). (2019). SAMR Issues Provisions for Declaration and Review of Probiotic Health Food (Draft) for Public Comments. http://www.cirs-reach.com/news-and-articles/SAMR-Issues-Provisions-for-Declaration-and-Review-of-Probiotic-Health-Food-Draft-for-Public-Comments.html accessed 1 April 2021.
  2. De Paula, 2018, Probióticos: Su impacto en la nutrición y la salud. Una visión desde el Cono Sur, Asociación Civil Danone para la Nutrición, la Salud y la Calidad de Vida, Moreno 877 - Piso 13, Argentina, 250
  3. European Regulation. (2002). Regulation (EC) No. 178/2002 of the European Parliament and of the Council laying down the general principles and requirements of food law, establishing the European Food Safety Authority and laying down procedures in matters of food safety. Official Journal, L 31, 1.2.2002.
  4. 2006, Regulation (EC) No. 1924/2006 of the European parliament and of the council of 20th December 2006 on nutrition and health claims made on foods, Official Journal of the European Union, L. 404, 9

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Chieffi, D., Fanelli, F., & Fusco, V.
Affiliations
Institute of Sciences of Food Production (IT)
Venue
Probiotics for Human Nutrition in Health and Disease
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2022
Pages
25-44
OpenAlex
W4285173139
Cited by
16
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1
FWCI
9.52
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Probiotics and Fermented Foods
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Food Science › Agricultural safety and regulations
Keywords
probiotics, probiotic foods, probiotic supplements, food regulation, health claims, labeling, regulatory harmonization, consumer protection, European Union regulation, United States regulation, Australia, China, Japan

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review