CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 1,565

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Gravity Equations: Workhorse,Toolkit, and Cookbook

Head, Keith, Mayer, Thierry·2014·Handbook of International Economics
DOI 10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 104

  1. Abowd, 1999, High wage workers and high wage firms, Econometrica, 67, 251, 10.1111/1468-0262.00020 · DOI
  2. Anderson, 1979, A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation, The American Economic Review, 69, 106
  3. Anderson, 2011, The gravity model, The Annual Review of Economics, 3, 133, 10.1146/annurev-economics-111809-125114 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Anderson, 2002, Insecurity and the pattern of trade: an empirical investigation, Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 342, 10.1162/003465302317411587 · DOI
  5. Anderson, 2003, Gravity with gravitas: a solution to the border puzzle, The American Economic Review, 93, 170, 10.1257/000282803321455214 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Anderson, 2010, The changing incidence of geography, American Economic Review, 100, 2157, 10.1257/aer.100.5.2157 · DOI
  7. Anderson, J., Yotov, Y., 2010b. Specialization: Pro-and Anti-Globalizing, 1990–2002. Working Paper 16301, NBER. · DOI
  8. Anderson, J.E., Yotov, Y.V., February 2012. Gold Standard Gravity. Working Paper 17835, NBER. · DOI
  9. Arkolakis, 2012, New trade models, same old gains?, American Economic Review, 102, 94, 10.1257/aer.102.1.94 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Armington, 1969, A theory of demand for products distinguished by place of production, Staff Papers, International Monetary Fund, 16, 159, 10.2307/3866403 · DOI
  11. Baier, 2001, The growth of world trade: tariffs, transport costs, and income similarity, Journal of International Economics, 53, 1, 10.1016/S0022-1996(00)00060-X · DOI
  12. Baier, 2007, Do free trade agreements actually increase members’ international trade?, Journal of International Economics, 71, 72, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2006.02.005 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Baier, 2009, Bonus vetus OLS: a simple method for approximating international trade-cost effects using the gravity equation, Journal of International Economics, 77, 77, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2008.10.004 · DOI
  14. Baker, 2001, Occupational gender composition and wages in Canada, 1987–1988, The Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 345, 10.1111/0008-4085.00078 · DOI
  15. Baldwin, 2011, Zeros, quality, and space: trade theory and trade evidence, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 3, 60
  16. Baldwin, 2007, Trade effects of the euro: a comparison of estimators, Journal of Economic Integration, 22, 780, 10.11130/jei.2007.22.4.780 · DOI
  17. Bergstrand, 1985, The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67, 474, 10.2307/1925976 · DOI
  18. Bergstrand, 2013, Gravity redux: estimation of gravity-equation coefficients, elasticities of substitution, and general equilibrium comparative statics under asymmetric bilateral trade costs, Journal of International Economics, 89, 110, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.05.005 · DOI
  19. Berman, 2012, How do different exporters react to exchange rate changes?, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 127, 437, 10.1093/qje/qjr057 · DOI
  20. Bernard, 2007, Firms in international trade, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21, 105, 10.1257/jep.21.3.105 · DOI
  21. Bernard, 2011, Multiproduct firms and trade liberalization, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126, 1271, 10.1093/qje/qjr021 · DOI
  22. Berthou, 2013, How do multi-product exporters react to a change in trade costs?, Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115, 326, 10.1111/sjoe.12006 · DOI
  23. Boulhol, 2013, Applying the GLM variance assumption to overcome the scale-dependence of the Negative Binomial QGPML Estimator, Econometric Reviews, posted online: 14 June 2013
  24. Bricongne, 2012, Firms and the global crisis: French exports in the turmoil, Journal of International Economics, 87, 134, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.002 · DOI
  25. Broda, 2006, Globalization and the gains from variety, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121, 541, 10.1162/qjec.2006.121.2.541 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Chaney, 2008, Distorted gravity: the intensive and extensive margins of international trade, American Economic Review, 98, 1707, 10.1257/aer.98.4.1707 · DOI
  27. Chen, 2005, Vertical specialization and three facts about U.S. international trade, The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 16, 35, 10.1016/j.najef.2004.12.004 · DOI
  28. Chen, 2011, Gravity, trade integration, and heterogeneity across industries, Journal of International Economics, 85, 206, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2011.07.005 · DOI
  29. Cipollina, 2010, Reciprocal trade agreements in gravity models: a meta-analysis, Review of International Economics, 18, 63, 10.1111/j.1467-9396.2009.00877.x · DOI
  30. Coeurdacier, 2009, The geography of asset trade and the euro: insiders and outsiders, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 23, 90, 10.1016/j.jjie.2008.11.001 · DOI
  31. Combes, 2005, The trade-creating effects of business and social networks: evidence from France, Journal of International Economics, 66, 1, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.07.003 · DOI
  32. Costinot, 2012, What goods do countries trade? A quantitative exploration of Ricardo’s ideas, Review of Economic Studies, 79, 581, 10.1093/restud/rdr033 · DOI · Paper page
  33. Crozet, 2010, Structural gravity equations with intensive and extensive margins, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Économique, 43, 41, 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2009.01563.x · DOI
  34. Crozet, 2012, Quality sorting and trade: firm-level evidence for French wine, Review of Economic Studies, 79, 609, 10.1093/restud/rdr030 · DOI
  35. Deardorff, 1984, Testing trade theories and predicting trade flows, vol. 1, 467
  36. Dekle, 2007, Unbalanced trade, American Economic Review, 97, 351, 10.1257/aer.97.2.351 · DOI
  37. Dekle, 2008, Global rebalancing with gravity: measuring the burden of adjustment, IMF Staff Papers, 55, 511, 10.1057/imfsp.2008.17 · DOI
  38. de Sousa, 2011, Does the single currency affect foreign direct investment?, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 113, 553, 10.1111/j.1467-9442.2011.01656.x · DOI
  39. De Sousa, 2012, Market access in global and regional trade, Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42, 1037, 10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.07.011 · DOI
  40. Disdier, 2008, The puzzling persistence of the distance effect on bilateral trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 90, 37, 10.1162/rest.90.1.37 · DOI
  41. Eaton, 2001, Trade in capital goods, European Economic Review, 45, 1195, 10.1016/S0014-2921(00)00103-3 · DOI
  42. Eaton, 2002, Technology, geography, and trade, Econometrica, 70, 1741, 10.1111/1468-0262.00352 · DOI · Paper page
  43. Eaton, 1994, Bilateralism and regionalism in Japanese and U.S. trade and direct foreign investment patterns, Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 8, 478, 10.1006/jjie.1994.1025 · DOI
  44. Eaton, 2004, Dissecting trade: firms, industries, and export destinations, The American Economic Review, 94, 150, 10.1257/0002828041301560 · DOI
  45. Eaton, 2011, An anatomy of international trade: evidence from French firms, Econometrica, 79, 1453, 10.3982/ECTA8318 · DOI
  46. Egger, 2011, An assessment of the Europe agreement’s effects on bilateral trade, GDP, and welfare, European Economic Review, 55, 263, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2010.05.002 · DOI
  47. Egger, 2011, The trade effects of endogenous preferential trade agreements, American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 3, 113
  48. Erkel-Rousse, 2002, Import price elasticities: reconsidering the evidence, Canadian Journal of Economics, 35, 282, 10.1111/1540-5982.00131 · DOI
  49. Ethier, 1982, National and international returns to scale in the modern theory of international trade, The American Economic Review, 72, 389
  50. Fajgelbaum, 2011, Income distribution, product quality, and international trade, Journal of Political Economy, 119, 721, 10.1086/662628 · DOI
  51. Feenstra, 1994, New product varieties and the measurement of international prices, The American Economic Review, 84, 157
  52. Feenstra, 2003, A homothetic utility function for monopolistic competition models, without constant price elasticity, Economics Letters, 78, 79, 10.1016/S0165-1765(02)00181-7 · DOI
  53. Feenstra, 2001, Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade, Canadian Journal of Economics, 34, 430, 10.1111/0008-4085.00082 · DOI
  54. Glick, 2002, Does a currency union affect trade? The time-series evidence, European Economic Review, 46, 1125, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00202-1 · DOI
  55. Glick, 2010, Collateral damage: trade disruption and the economic impact of war, Review of Economics and Statistics, 92, 102, 10.1162/rest.2009.12023 · DOI
  56. Guimaraes, 2010, A simple feasible alternative procedure to estimate models with high-dimensional fixed effects, Stata Journal, 10, 628, 10.1177/1536867X1101000406 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Hallak, 2006, Product quality and the direction of trade, Journal of International Economics, 68, 238, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.04.001 · DOI
  58. Hanson, 2005, Market potential, increasing returns and geographic concentration, Journal of International Economics, 67, 1, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.09.008 · DOI
  59. Harrigan, 1996, Openness to trade in manufactures in the OECD, Journal of International Economics, 40, 23, 10.1016/0022-1996(95)01395-4 · DOI
  60. Haveman, 2004, Alternative hypotheses and the volume of trade: the gravity equation and the extent of specialization, The Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Économique, 37, 199, 10.1111/j.0008-4085.2004.011_1.x · DOI
  61. Head, 2000, Non-Europe: the magnitude and causes of market fragmentation in the EU, Review of World Economics, 136, 284, 10.1007/BF02707689 · DOI
  62. Head, 2004, The empirics of agglomeration and trade, Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 4, 2609, 10.1016/S1574-0080(04)80016-6 · DOI
  63. Head, 2004, Market potential and the location of Japanese investment in the European Union, Review of Economics and Statistics, 86, 959, 10.1162/0034653043125257 · DOI
  64. Head, 2001, Increasing returns versus national product differentiation as an explanation for the pattern of US–Canada trade, American Economic Review, 91, 858, 10.1257/aer.91.4.858 · DOI · Paper page
  65. Head, 2008, FDI as an outcome of the market for corporate control: theory and evidence, Journal of International Economics, 74, 2, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2007.04.004 · DOI
  66. Head, 2009, How remote is the offshoring threat?, European Economic Review, 53, 429, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2008.08.001 · DOI
  67. Head, 2010, The erosion of colonial trade linkages after independence, Journal of International Economics, 81, 1, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2010.01.002 · DOI · Paper page
  68. Hillberry, 2008, Trade responses to geographic frictions: a decomposition using micro-data, European Economic Review, 52, 527, 10.1016/j.euroecorev.2007.03.003 · DOI
  69. Hortaçsu, 2009, The Geography of trade in online transactions: evidence from eBay and Mercado Libre, American Economic Journal: Microeconomics, 1, 53
  70. Hummels, D., 1999. Towards a Geography of Trade Costs. Technical Report 17, GTAP Working Paper. · DOI
  71. Isard, 1954, Location theory and international and interregional trade theory, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 68, 97, 10.2307/1881920 · DOI
  72. Jacks, 2008, Trade costs, 1870–2000, The American Economic Review, 98, 529, 10.1257/aer.98.2.529 · DOI
  73. Krugman, 1979, Increasing returns, monopolistic competition, and international trade, Journal of International Economics, 4, 469, 10.1016/0022-1996(79)90017-5 · DOI
  74. Krugman, 1995, Increasing returns, imperfect competition and the positive theory of international trade, vol. 3, 1243
  75. Lai, H., Trefler, D., 2002. The Gains from Trade with Monopolistic Competition: Specification, Estimation, and Mis-Specification. Working Paper 9169, NBER, September. · DOI
  76. Lawless, 2010, Deconstructing gravity: trade costs and extensive and intensive margins, Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue Canadienne d’Économique, 43, 1149, 10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01609.x · DOI
  77. Leamer, 1995, International trade theory: the evidence, vol. 3, 1339
  78. Manning, 2001, Estimating log models: to transform or not to transform?, Journal of Health Economics, 20, 461, 10.1016/S0167-6296(01)00086-8 · DOI · Paper page
  79. Martin, 2008, Make trade not war?, Review of Economic Studies, 75, 865, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2008.00492.x · DOI
  80. Martin, 2012, The geography of conflicts and free trade agreements, American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 4, 1
  81. Martin, 2004, Financial super-markets: size matters for asset trade, Journal of International Economics, 64, 335, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.12.001 · DOI
  82. McCallum, 1995, National borders matter: Canada–US regional trade patterns, The American Economic Review, 85, 615
  83. Melitz, 2003, The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity, Econometrica, 71, 1695, 10.1111/1468-0262.00467 · DOI · Paper page
  84. Melitz, 2008, Market size, trade, and productivity, Review of Economic Studies, 75, 295, 10.1111/j.1467-937X.2007.00463.x · DOI
  85. Novy, 2013, International trade without CES: estimating translog gravity, Journal of International Economics, 89, 271, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.08.010 · DOI
  86. Okawa, Y., Van Wincoop, E., 2010. Gravity in International Finance. Working Paper 7, Hong Kong Institute for Monetary Research. · DOI
  87. Okawa, 2012, Gravity in international finance, Journal of International Economics, 87, 205, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2012.01.006 · DOI
  88. Ossa, 2011, A New trade theory of GATT/WTO negotiations, Journal of Political Economy, 119, 122, 10.1086/659371 · DOI
  89. Ossa, R., 2012. Why Trade Matters After All. Working Paper 18113, NBER. · DOI
  90. Ottaviano, 2002, Agglomeration and trade revisited, International Economic Review, 43, 409, 10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00021 · DOI
  91. Portes, 2005, The determinants of cross-border equity flows, Journal of International Economics, 65, 269, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2004.05.002 · DOI
  92. Portes, 2001, Information and capital flows: the determinants of transactions in financial assets, European Economic Review, 45, 783, 10.1016/S0014-2921(01)00138-6 · DOI
  93. Rauch, 2002, Ethnic Chinese networks in international trade, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 84, 116, 10.1162/003465302317331955 · DOI
  94. Redding, 2004, Economic geography and international inequality, Journal of International Economics, 62, 53, 10.1016/j.jinteco.2003.07.001 · DOI
  95. Romalis, 2007, Nafta’s and Cusfta’s impact on international trade, Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 416, 10.1162/rest.89.3.416 · DOI
  96. Rose, 2000, One money, one market: the effect of common currencies on trade, Economic policy, 15, 7, 10.1111/1468-0327.00056 · DOI
  97. Rose, 2004, Do we really know that the WTO increases trade?, The American Economic Review, 94, 98, 10.1257/000282804322970724 · DOI · Paper page
  98. Santos Silva, 2006, The log of gravity, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 88, 641, 10.1162/rest.88.4.641 · DOI · Paper page
  99. Santos Silva, 2010, Currency unions in prospect and retrospect, Annual Review of Economics, 2, 51, 10.1146/annurev.economics.102308.124508 · DOI
  100. Santos Silva, 2011, Further simulation evidence on the performance of the Poisson-PML estimator, Economics Letters, 112, 220, 10.1016/j.econlet.2011.05.008 · DOI
  101. Savage, 1960, A statistical model of the gross analysis of transaction flows, Econometrica, 28, 551, 10.2307/1910131 · DOI
  102. Simonovska, I., Waugh, M.E., 2011. The Elasticity of Trade: Estimates and Evidence. Working Paper 16796, NBER, February. · DOI
  103. Trefler, 1995, The case of the missing trade and other mysteries, The American Economic Review, 85, 1029
  104. Wei, S.-J., April 1996. Intra-National versus International Trade: How Stubborn are Nations in Global Integration? Working Paper 5531, NBER. · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 1,565

Metadata

Authors
Head, K., & Mayer, T.
Venue
Handbook of International Economics
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2014
Pages
131-195
ISSN
1573-4404
DOI
10.1016/b978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3
Cited by
1,565
References
2
Language
en
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review