Cited by 845Qualitative Research Methods and ApplicationsQualitative Research Methods and EthicsSociology and Education Studies

Grounding Grounded Theory

Dey, Ian·1999·Grounding Grounded Theory

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/b978-012214640-4/50011-5

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The view of saturation as an event gives rise to a degree of uncertainty and equivocation, in part driven by the uncertain logic of the concept itself-as a statement about the unobserved based on the observed.

    “The view of saturation as an event has been problematized by others (Strauss and Corbin 1998; Dey 1999; Nelson 2016), and we have explored the implications of conceptualizing saturation in this way, arguing that it appears to give rise to a degree of uncertainty and equivocation, in part driven by the uncertain logic of the concept itself—as a statement about the unobserved based on the observed.”

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dey, I.
Corresponding author
Dey, Ian
Venue
Grounding Grounded Theory
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
1999
Pages
249-269
OpenAlex
W2502856925
Cited by
845
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 35 · 2025: 39 · 2024: 41 · 2023: 43 · 2022: 51 · 2021: 41 · 2020: 38 · 2019: 47 · 2018: 46 · 2017: 48 · 2016: 47 · 2015: 45 · 2014: 54 · 2013: 34 · 2012: 39
FWCI
36.63
Type
book chapter
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Elsevier eBooks (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › Qualitative Research Methods and Applications
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Qualitative Research Methods and Ethics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Sociology and Education Studies
Keywords
grounded theory, qualitative research methodology, social research, methodological principles, methodological considerations

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review