Cited by 56Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychiatric care and mental health servicesOccupational Therapy Practice and Research

Joining, belonging, and re-valuing: A process of meaning-making through group participation in a mental health lifestyle intervention

Lund, Kristine, Argentzell, Elisabeth, Leufstadius, Christel, Tjörnstrand, Carina, Eklund, Mona·2019·Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy

Abstract

Background Balancing Everyday Life (BEL), a new group-based intervention for mental health service users, was implemented in Sweden. Mental health service users often experience group interventions as meaningful, but knowledge of the process of meaning-making in a group is lacking.Aim To explore participants' perceptions of the group in the Balancing Everyday Life (BEL) lifestyle intervention; specifically, personal experiences of what brings meaning when participating in a group.Methods This qualitative Grounded Theory study included 26 interviews with 19 BEL participants.Results A process of meaning-making in a group was constructed: Joining with others: from feeling alone to connected, A sense of belonging: mutual support and understanding, and Re-valuing Self: respect and self-worth. No longer feeling alone contributed to meaning. Peers and group leaders were considered important parts of the group, and participants appreciated feeling understood, respected, and helping others.Conclusion The proposed process of meaning-making, as well as 'Joining' as a unique step, seems to be new contributions which could help practitioners when organizing groups. Overcoming fear of joining could break a cycle of isolation and lead to connecting and belonging. The value of participants finding purpose through helping others should be further explored.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/11038128.2017.1409266

Cites

65 of 65 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lund, K., Argentzell, E., Leufstadius, C., Tjörnstrand, C., & Eklund, M.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Lund, Kristine
Venue
Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy
Published
2017-11-28
Volume
26
Issue
1
Pages
55-68
ISSN
  • 1103-8128 (ISSN-L)
  • 1651-2014
OpenAlex
W2768406920
Cited by
56
References
65
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 1
FWCI
4.88
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Scandinavian Journal of Occupational Therapy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • Swedish Research Council (521-, -)
  • VetenskapsrÃ¥det
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychiatric care and mental health services
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Occupational Therapy › Occupational Therapy Practice and Research
Keywords
meaning-making, group participation, mental health service users, lifestyle intervention, sense of belonging, social isolation, peer support, self-worth, group leaders, helping behavior
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Life Style, Male, Middle Aged, Occupational Therapy, Patient Participation, Quality of Life, Sweden, Qualitative Research, Grounded Theory

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review