Cited by 62Impact of Technology on AdolescentsMental Health via WritingPsychology and Mental Health

Online social networking and psychological experiences: the perceptions of young people with mental health difficulties

Open access
Singleton, Amy, Abeles, Paul, Smith, Ian C.·2016·Computers in Human Behavior

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.chb.2016.03.011

Cites

50 of 50 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Other studies have concluded that social networking features in digital mental health interventions are a gamble due to the potential for both negative and positive effects.

    “Other studies have similarly concluded that social networking features in DMHIs are a “gamble” due to the potential for both negative and positive effects (79).”

    From What Works and What Doesn’t Work? A Systematic Review of Digital Mental Health Interventions for Depression and Anxiety in Young People (2019) · cites this paper as [79]

    Section 3.9 calls young people's use of social networking sites a “gamble,” and the Discussion describes both harmful and beneficial experiences. The study concerns their use of social networking sites, however, not social networking features within digital mental health interventions; that application is not established by the cited paper. (LLM, conf=0.88)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 52 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. Steinberg, L. (2010). Adolescence (9th Edn.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Singleton, A., Abeles, P., & Smith, I. C.
Affiliations
  • Furness College (GB)
  • Royal Manchester Children's Hospital (GB)
Corresponding author
Singleton, Amy
Venue
Computers in Human Behavior
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2016-08
Volume
61
Pages
394-403
ISSN
0747-5632 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2303899691
Cited by
62
References
52
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 6 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 3
FWCI
20.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Computers in Human Behavior (publishedVersion)
  • Lancaster EPrints (Lancaster University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Impact of Technology on Adolescents
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health via Writing
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychology and Mental Health
Keywords
online social networking, adolescents, mental illness, psychological well-being, social support, peer support, anonymity, psychological distress, mental health services, social media use

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review