CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 4

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Tagged ATG8-Coding Constructs for the In Vitro and In Vivo Assessment of ATG4 Activity

López-Otín, C., Mariño, G.·2017·Methods in Enzymology
DOI 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.11.001
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

Autophagy is a catabolic pathway, which mediates the degradation of cytoplasmic components and sustains many essential cellular functions. More than 30 genes have been involved in different aspects of this essential process in simple eukaryotes as yeast. Among these genes, those coding for members of the Atg4-Atg8 proteolytic system have acquired a high degree of complexity throughout evolution. Contrasting with the situation in unicellular eukaryotes, in which the system is composed by just a single protease (Atg4) and a single substrate (Atg8), evolution has led to the presence of several members for both Atg4 and Atg8 families in multicellular organisms. In human cells, there are four Atg4 proteases and six Atg8 substrates, which have probably evolved to cope with specific requirements for autophagic pathway in more complex scenarios. Despite these considerations, the reasons for the evolutionarily acquired complexity of this proteolytic system are still not completely understood. In this work, we describe two different applications of a relatively simple but useful technique to analyze protease-substrate specificity of this system in mammalian cells. By using the described technique, it is possible to determine the cellular efficiency in the initial cleavage for each of the Atg8 family members in diverse experimental settings both in cultured cells and live laboratory mice.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/bs.mie.2016.11.001

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 4 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. Ahlen, 2016, A targeted controlled force injection of genetic material in vivo, Molecular Therapy. Methods & Clinical Development, 5, 16016, 10.1038/mtm.2016.16 · DOI
  2. Cabrera, 2013, ATG4B/autophagin-1 regulates intestinal homeostasis and protects mice from experimental colitis, Autophagy, 9, 1188, 10.4161/auto.24797 · DOI
  3. Choi, 2013, Autophagy in human health and disease, The New England Journal of Medicine, 368, 651, 10.1056/NEJMra1205406 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Djavaheri-Mergny, 2010, Cross talk between apoptosis and autophagy by caspase-mediated cleavage of Beclin 1, Oncogene, 29, 1717, 10.1038/onc.2009.519 · DOI
  5. Feng, 2014, The machinery of macroautophagy, Cell Research, 24, 24, 10.1038/cr.2013.168 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Fernandez, 2015, The functional and pathologic relevance of autophagy proteases, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 125, 33, 10.1172/JCI73940 · DOI
  7. Kaminskyy, 2012, Proteases in autophagy, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1824, 44, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.05.013 · DOI
  8. Klionsky, 2003, A unified nomenclature for yeast autophagy-related genes, Developmental Cell, 5, 539, 10.1016/S1534-5807(03)00296-X · DOI
  9. Kovacsics, 2014, Transient expression of proteins by hydrodynamic gene delivery in mice, Journal of Visualized Experiments: JoVE, 87, e51481
  10. Le Grand, 2011, GABARAPL1 (GEC1): Original or copycat?, Autophagy, 7, 1098, 10.4161/auto.7.10.15904 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Li, 2011, Kinetics comparisons of mammalian Atg4 homologues indicate selective preferences toward diverse Atg8 substrates, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 286, 7327, 10.1074/jbc.M110.199059 · DOI
  12. Marino, 2010, Autophagy is essential for mouse sense of balance, The Journal of Clinical Investigation, 120, 2331, 10.1172/JCI42601 · DOI
  13. Marino, 2004, Autophagy: Molecular mechanisms, physiological functions and relevance in human pathology, Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 61, 1439, 10.1007/s00018-004-4012-4 · DOI
  14. Marino, 2007, Tissue-specific autophagy alterations and increased tumorigenesis in mice deficient in Atg4C/autophagin-3, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 282, 18573, 10.1074/jbc.M701194200 · DOI
  15. Mizushima, 2007, Autophagy: Process and function, Genes & Development, 21, 2861, 10.1101/gad.1599207 · DOI
  16. Mizushima, 2011, Autophagy: Renovation of cells and tissues, Cell, 147, 728, 10.1016/j.cell.2011.10.026 · DOI
  17. Perez-Perez, 2014, The yeast autophagy protease Atg4 is regulated by thioredoxin, Autophagy, 10, 1953, 10.4161/auto.34396 · DOI
  18. Reggiori, 2013, Autophagic processes in yeast: Mechanism, machinery and regulation, Genetics, 194, 341, 10.1534/genetics.112.149013 · DOI
  19. Repnik, 2012, Lysosomes and lysosomal cathepsins in cell death, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, 1824, 22, 10.1016/j.bbapap.2011.08.016 · DOI
  20. Rubinsztein, 2009, In search of an “autophagomometer”, Autophagy, 5, 585, 10.4161/auto.5.5.8823 · DOI · Paper page
  21. Scherz-Shouval, 2003, The COOH terminus of GATE-16, an intra-Golgi transport modulator, is cleaved by the human cysteine protease HsApg4A, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, 278, 14053, 10.1074/jbc.M212108200 · DOI
  22. Scherz-Shouval, 2007, Reactive oxygen species are essential for autophagy and specifically regulate the activity of Atg4, The EMBO Journal, 26, 1749, 10.1038/sj.emboj.7601623 · DOI · Paper page
  23. Singh, 2011, Autophagy in the cellular energetic balance, Cell Metabolism, 13, 495, 10.1016/j.cmet.2011.04.004 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Tanida, 2006, Atg8L/Apg8L is the fourth mammalian modifier of mammalian Atg8 conjugation mediated by human Atg4B, Atg7 and Atg3, The FEBS Journal, 273, 2553, 10.1111/j.1742-4658.2006.05260.x · DOI
  25. Wang, 2013, The carboxyl-terminal amino acids render pro-human LC3B migration similar to lipidated LC3B in SDS-PAGE, PLoS One, 8
  26. Yang, 2010, Mammalian autophagy: Core molecular machinery and signaling regulation, Current Opinion in Cell Biology, 22, 124, 10.1016/j.ceb.2009.11.014 · DOI · Paper page
  27. Yousefi, 2006, Calpain-mediated cleavage of Atg5 switches autophagy to apoptosis, Nature Cell Biology, 8, 1124, 10.1038/ncb1482 · DOI · Paper page
  28. Zhang, 2012, In vivo gene delivery by nonviral vectors: Overcoming hurdles?, Molecular Therapy, 20, 1298, 10.1038/mt.2012.79 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
López-Otín, C., & Mariño, G.
Venue
Methods in Enzymology
Publisher
Elsevier
Published
2017
Pages
189-205
ISSN
0076-6879
DOI
10.1016/bs.mie.2016.11.001
Cited by
4
References
4
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review