Cited by 18Sleep and Work-Related FatigueSleep and related disordersCircadian rhythm and melatonin

Predicting pilot's sleep during layovers using their own behaviour or data from colleagues: implications for biomathematical models

Dorrian, Jillian, Darwent, David, Dawson, Drew, Roach, Gregory D.·2012·Accident Analysis & Prevention

Abstract

Biomathematical models are used in industry to estimate how much sleep people are likely to get on different work patterns, and how efficient and safe people are likely to be at work. Since there is evidence to suggest that individuals respond differently to sleep loss, there has been a recent focus on trying to account for individual differences. One possible approach could use past behaviour to predict future responses to similar working conditions. This study investigated the predictive value of sleep timing and duration data for a particular individual on a break between shifts relative to data from their colleagues. Sleep diaries and wrist actigraphy were collected from 306 international long-haul pilots for at least 2-weeks. Fifty layovers, equivalent in origin and destination, length and timing, were completed twice by individual pilots. Matched layovers done by other pilots (n=2311) were also identified. Layover periods were analysed for minute-by-minute correspondence of sleep or wake (yes/no), and total sleep time (TST). Using an individual's own data improved concordance by approximately 5% relative to using a large sample of different pilots, and by 10% relative to using a random sample of 50 different pilots. Using an individual's own TST to predict their TST on an equivalent layover yielded an r value of 0.83, compared to r=0.78 when data from a colleague was used, and r=0.73 using different pilots in a random sample of equivalent size. The mean difference in TST using pilots' own data was <20 min, compared to <40 min using data from colleagues. However, the confidence limits on these differences were large (up to 8h). Results suggest that for international pilots on specific layover patterns, knowing the past behaviour of an individual may only represent a modest improvement over knowing the length and timing of a colleague's sleep, when it comes to predicting their sleep behaviour.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.aap.2011.09.019

Cites

17 of 17 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping has shown effectiveness in improving safety.

    “To address these concerns, sleep disorders screening in addition to circadian approaches and scheduled napping have shown effectiveness in improving safety.189–197”

    From Sleep, Health, and Society (2017) · cites this paper as [190]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

2 of the 19 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Dorrian, J., Darwent, D., Dawson, D., & Roach, G. D.
Affiliations
University of South Australia (AU)
Corresponding author
Dorrian, Jillian
Venue
Accident Analysis & Prevention
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-03
Volume
45
Pages
17-21
ISSN
0001-4575 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2095192731
Cited by
18
References
19
Citations by year
2024: 1 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 4 · 2018: 2 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 1
FWCI
0.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Accident Analysis & Prevention (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Australian Research Council
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and Work-Related Fatigue
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Sleep and related disorders
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Endocrine and Autonomic Systems › Circadian rhythm and melatonin
Keywords
layover, total sleep time, sleep prediction, individual differences, biomathematical model, sleep diary, actigraphy, shift work, sleep deprivation
MeSH terms
Aerospace Medicine, Aviation, Fatigue, Humans, Individuality, Models, Theoretical, Neurobiology, Predictive Value of Tests, Sleep, Work Schedule Tolerance

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review