The DOI matches its Crossref record; 277 of the 278 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Insights into coacervative and dispersive liquid-phase microextraction strategies with hydrophilic media – A review
Open accessAbstract
Since the development of liquid-phase microextraction (LPME), different LPME modes depending on the experimental set-up to carry out the extraction have been described. Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction (DLLME), in which a small amount of the water-insoluble extraction solvent is dispersed in the sample, is the most successful mode in terms of number of applications reported. Advances within DLLME have been mainly shifted to the incorporation of green, smart and tunable materials as extraction solvents to improve the sustainability and efficiency of the method. In this sense, hydrophilic media represent a promising alternative since the water-miscibility of these substances increases the mass transfer of the analytes to the extraction media, leading to higher extraction efficiencies. Considering the variety of hydrophilic media that have been incorporated in LPME approaches resembling DLLME, this review aims to classify these methods in order to clarify the confusing terminology used for some of the strategies. Hydrophilic media covered in this review comprise surfactants, polar organic solvents, deep eutectic solvents, ionic liquids, water-miscible polymers, and switchable solvents. Different physicochemical mechanisms of phase separation are discussed for each LPME method, including the coacervation phenomena and other driving forces, such as pH, temperature, salting-out effect, metathesis reaction and organic solvents. LPME modes are classified (in cloud-point extraction, coacervative extraction, aqueous biphasic systems, and different DLLME modes depending on the extraction medium) according to both the nature of the water-miscible extraction phase and the driving force of the separation. In addition, the main advances and analytical applications of these methods in the last three years are described.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The cited source says what the claim attributes to it.
In the citing paper
“In 2019, Altunay et al. [65] employed for the first time a DESs synthesized by 'natural' components, termed as 'natural DES' (NADES) [66], for a DLLME application.”
From Use of green alternative solvents in dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction: A review (2022) · cites this paper as [66]
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Deep Eutectic Solvents (DESs) and Their Applications
Smith, E. L., Abbott, A. P., & Ryder, K. S. (2014) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr300162p · Cited by 7,378
Determination of organic compounds in water using dispersive liquid–liquid microextraction
Rezaee, M., Assadi, Y., Milani Hosseini, M.-R., Aghaee, E., Ahmadi, F., & Berijani, S. (2006) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2006.03.007 · Cited by 3,402
Lei, Z., Chen, B., Koo, Y.-M., & MacFarlane, D. R. (2017) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00246 · Cited by 1,492
Gutowski, K. E., Broker, G. A., Willauer, H. D., Huddleston, J. G., Swatloski, R. P., Holbrey, J. D., & Rogers, R. D. (2003) · Journal of the American Chemical Society · doi:10.1021/ja0351802 · Cited by 1,038
Reversible nonpolar-to-polar solvent
Jessop, P. G., Heldebrant, D. J., Li, X., Eckert, C. A., & Liotta, C. L. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/4361102a · Cited by 973
Aqueous two-phase system (ATPS): an overview and advances in its applications
Iqbal, M., Tao, Y., Xie, S., Zhu, Y., Chen, D., Wang, X., Huang, L., Peng, D., Sattar, A., Shabbir, M. A. B., et al. (2016) · Biological Procedures Online · doi:10.1186/s12575-016-0048-8 · Cited by 824
Aqueous biphasic systems: a boost brought about by using ionic liquids
Freire, M. G., Cláudio, A. F. M., Araújo, J. M. M., Coutinho, J. A. P., Marrucho, I. M., Lopes, J. N. C., & Rebelo, L. P. N. (2012) · Chemical Society Reviews · doi:10.1039/c2cs35151j · Cited by 820
Self-citationExtraction techniques with deep eutectic solvents
Cunha, S. C., & Fernandes, J. O. (2018) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2018.05.001 · Cited by 760
FREEMANTLE, M. (1998) · Chemical & Engineering News · doi:10.1021/cen-v076n013.p032 · Cited by 754
Complex coacervation: Principles, mechanisms and applications in microencapsulation
Timilsena, Y. P., Akanbi, T. O., Khalid, N., Adhikari, B., & Barrow, C. J. (2018) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2018.10.144 · Cited by 609
Cited by
Sorted by citations
González-Martín, R., Gutiérrez‐Serpa, A., Pino, V., & Sajid, M. (2023) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/j.chroma.2023.464291 · Cited by 288
Self-citationUse of green alternative solvents in dispersive liquid‐liquid microextraction: A review
Grau, J., Azorín, C., Benedé, J. L., Chisvert, A., & Salvador, A. (2022) · Journal of Separation Science · doi:10.1002/jssc.202100609 · Cited by 131
Dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction: Evolution in design, application areas, and green aspects
Sajid, M. (2022) · TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.trac.2022.116636 · Cited by 125
Applications of (natural) deep eutectic solvents in liquid phase microextraction: A review
Mansour, F. R., Bedair, A., Hamed, M., Magdy, G., Ali, I., & Locatelli, M. (2024) · Microchemical Journal · doi:10.1016/j.microc.2024.110178 · Cited by 107
Green microextraction methodologies for sample preparations
Kokosa, J. M., & Przyjazny, A. (2022) · Green Analytical Chemistry · doi:10.1016/j.greeac.2022.100023 · Cited by 90
Metadata
- Authors
- Pacheco-Fernández, I., González-Martín, R., e Silva, F. A., Freire, M. G., & Pino, V.
- Affiliations
- Universidad de La Laguna (ES)
- University of Aveiro (PT)
- Corresponding author
- Freire, Mara G.
- Pino, Verónica
- Venue
- Analytica Chimica Acta
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2021-01
- Volume
- 1143
- Pages
- 225-249
- ISSN
- 0003-2670 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3080922247
- Cited by
- 69
- References
- 278
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 9 · 2023: 18 · 2022: 14 · 2021: 12
- FWCI
- 1.48
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Licence
- Locations
- Analytica Chimica Acta (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
- Funders
- Ministério da Ciência, Tecnologia e Ensino Superior
- Universidad de La Laguna
- Agencia Canaria de Investigación, Innovación y Sociedad de la Información
- Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
- Ministerio de Educación, Cultura y Deporte
- European Social Fund
- Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (MAT2017-89207-R, UIDB/50011/2020, UIDP/50011/2020)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical chemistry methods development
- Physical Sciences › Chemical Engineering › Filtration and Separation › Chemical and Physical Properties in Aqueous Solutions
- Physical Sciences › Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry › Analytical Chemistry and Chromatography
- Keywords
- liquid-phase microextraction, dispersive liquid-liquid microextraction, coacervation, surfactants, deep eutectic solvents, ionic liquids, switchable solvents, phase separation mechanism, cloud point extraction, aqueous two-phase systems, salting-out, metathesis, green solvents, extraction efficiency
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
