CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 28Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnoutStress and Burnout ResearchOccupational Health and Burnout

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 9 of the 9 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Program to Prevent Burnout, Depression, and Anxiety in First-Year Pediatric Residents

Slavin, Stuart, Shoss, Mindy, Broom, Matthew A.·2017·Academic Pediatrics
DOI 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.016

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • In the coaching intervention subgroup, emotional exhaustion (EE) was significantly reduced: Cohen's d SMD -0.24 (95% CI -0.40 to -0.07, p = 0.04, I2 = 41.6%).

    “Subgroup analyses of coaching intervention [59–72, 74, 75] demonstrated a post-intervention Cohen’s d SMD in EE (-0.24, 95% CI -0.40 to -0.07, p = 0.04, I2 = 41.6%).”

    From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

  • The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 using historical controls, 13 utilizing self-control studies, and 11 randomized controlled concurrent trials.

    “The majority of studies employed non-randomized, non-concurrent designs, with 9 (27.2%) using historical controls [44, 48, 49, 56, 59, 68, 71, 75, 76] and 13 (39.4%) utilizing self-control studies [47, 50, 53, 54, 58, 61, 65–67, 69, 70, 72, 73]. Eleven (33.3%) studies were randomized, controlled, concurrent trials [45, 51, 52, 55, 57, 60–64, 74].”

    From Individual and organizational interventions to reduce burnout in resident physicians: a systematic review and meta-analysis (2024) · cites this paper as [68]

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Related

Metadata

Authors
Slavin, S., Shoss, M., & Broom, M. A.
Affiliations
Saint Louis University (US)
Corresponding author
Slavin, Stuart
ORCID
Venue
Academic Pediatrics
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2017-05
Volume
17
Issue
4
Pages
456-458
ISSN
1876-2859 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.acap.2016.12.016
OpenAlex
W2569730660
Cited by
28
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 6 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 1
FWCI
3.99
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)
Locations
  • Academic Pediatrics (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Healthcare professionals’ stress and burnout
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Stress and Burnout Research
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Occupational Health and Burnout
Keywords
burnout prevention, depression, anxiety, pediatric residents, first-year residents, resident mental health, occupational stress, meaningful work, ethical considerations, peer support
MeSH terms
Pediatricians, Anxiety, Burnout, Professional, Depression, Helplessness, Learned, Humans, Internship and Residency, Pediatrics, Case-Control Studies, Resilience, Psychological

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review