Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 575

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes

Open access
SCHATZ, P, PARDINI, J, LOVELL, M, COLLINS, M, PODELL, K·2006·Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology

Abstract

This study explored the diagnostic utility of the composite scores of Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Testing (ImPACT) and Post Concussion Symptom Scale scores (PCSS). Recently concussed high school athletes (N=72) were tested within 72 h of sustaining a concussion, and data were compared to non-concussed high school athletes with no history of concussion (N=66). Between-groups MANOVA revealed a significant multivariate effect of concussion on test performance (p<.001); univariate ANOVAS revealed all six measures contributed to the between-groups differences. A discriminant function analyses was conducted to measure the ability of the five ImPACT composite scores, as well as the PCSS to classify concussion status. One discriminant function was identified that consisted of the Visual Memory, Processing Speed, and Impulse Control composite scores PCSS, which correctly classified 85.5% of the cases. Approximately 82% of participants in the concussion group and 89% of participants in the control group were correctly classified. Using these data, the sensitivity of ImPACT was 81.9%, and the specificity was 89.4%. As part of a formal concussion management program, ImPACT is a useful tool for the assessment of the neurocognitive and neurobehavioral sequelae of concussion, and can also provide post-injury cognitive and symptom data that can assist a practitioner in making safer return to play decisions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.001

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Cited by

See all 575

Metadata

Authors
SCHATZ, P., PARDINI, J., LOVELL, M., COLLINS, M., & PODELL, K.
Venue
Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology
Published
2006-01
Volume
21
Issue
1
Pages
91-99
ISSN
0887-6177 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2153042227
Cited by
575
References
3
FWCI
6.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.001
The paper
SCHATZ, P., PARDINI, J., LOVELL, M., COLLINS, M., & PODELL, K. (2006). Sensitivity and specificity of the ImPACT Test Battery for concussion in athletes. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.acn.2005.08.001

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.