Cited by 30Advanced Battery Technologies ResearchSpacecraft Design and TechnologyAdvancements in Battery Materials

Characterization of Lithium-Polymer batteries for CubeSat applications

Navarathinam, Nimal, Lee, Regina, Chesser, Hugh·2011·Acta Astronautica

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actaastro.2011.02.004

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Navarathinam, N., Lee, R., & Chesser, H.
Affiliations
York University (CA)
Corresponding author
Lee, Regina
Venue
Acta Astronautica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2011-06
Volume
68
Issue
11-12
Pages
1752-1760
ISSN
0094-5765 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2078550341
Cited by
30
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.25
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Acta Astronautica (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Automotive Engineering › Advanced Battery Technologies Research
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Aerospace Engineering › Spacecraft Design and Technology
  • Physical Sciences › Engineering › Electrical and Electronic Engineering › Advancements in Battery Materials
Keywords
lithium polymer batteries, CubeSat, nanosatellites, battery characterization, battery chemistry, power budget, power requirements, environmental testing, commercial batteries, space power systems

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review