Cited by 19Neuroscience and Neural EngineeringVagus Nerve Stimulation ResearchNerve injury and regeneration

The foreign body response and morphometric changes associated with mesh-style peripheral nerve cuffs

Christensen, Michael B., Tresco, Patrick A.·2018·Acta Biomaterialia

Abstract

Nerve cuffs have been used to anchor and protect penetrating electrodes in peripheral nerves and have been used as non-penetrating electrodes for neural recording and nerve stimulation. The material of choice for such applications is silicone, an inert synthetic biomaterial which elicits a minimal chronic foreign body response (FBR). While histological studies of solid silicone cuffs are available, to the best of our knowledge a comparison to other cuff designs is not well documented. Here, we describe the FBR and morphological changes that accompany nerve cuff implantation in the rat sciatic nerve by comparing a metallic mesh with and without a parylene coating to one made of silicone. Two months after implantation, we observed that such implants, irrespective of the cuff type, were associated with a persistent inflammatory response consisting of activated macrophages attached to the implant surfaces, which extended into the endoneurial space of the encapsulated nerve. We also observed foreign body giant cells in the epineurial space that were more prevalent in the mesh cohorts. The mesh cuff groups showed significant changes in several morphometric parameters that were not seen in the silicon group including reductions in nerve fiber packing density and a greater reduction of large diameter fibers. High magnification microscopy also showed greater evidence of foamy macrophages in the endoneurial space of the mesh implanted cohorts. Although the precise mechanisms are unknown, the results showed that mesh style nerve cuffs show a greater inflammatory response and had greater reductions in morphometric changes in the underlying nerve compared to silicone in the absence of a penetrating injury. Statement of significance While traditional silicone cuffs have been in use for decades, the inflammatory and morphometric effects of these cuffs on the underlying nerve have not been deeply studied. Further, manipulation of the foreign body response to nerve cuffs by using various materials and/or designs has not been well reported. Therefore, we report the inflammatory response around nerve cuffs of various materials and designs, as well as report morphometric parameters of the underlying nerve. These data provide important information regarding the potential for quantitative morphometric changes associated with the use of nerve cuffs, and, importantly, suggests that these changes are associated with the degree of inflammation associated with the cuff.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actbio.2017.11.059

Cites

9 of 9 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • PDMS cuffs develop lower degrees of trauma and FBR than cuffs made from other flexible materials such as metallic meshes.

    “PDMS cuffs develop lower degrees of trauma and FBR than cuffs made from other flexible materials such as metallic meshes (Christensen and Tresco, 2018), matching the pattern seen in other low-stiffness materials (Liu et al., 2019, 2020).”

    From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Christensen and Tresco, 2018

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Christensen, M. B., & Tresco, P. A.
Affiliations
University of Utah (US)
Corresponding author
Christensen, Michael B.
Venue
Acta Biomaterialia
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-02
Volume
67
Pages
79-86
ISSN
1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2772863835
Cited by
19
References
9
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
FWCI
0.67
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
University of Utah
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
Keywords
foreign body reaction, silicone, parylene coating, peripheral nerves, sciatic nerve, macrophage activation, foreign body giant cells, nerve morphometry, chronic inflammation, neural recording electrodes
MeSH terms
Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Foreign-Body Reaction, Male, Nerve Fibers, Peripheral Nerves, Rats, Inbred F344, Implants, Experimental

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review