The foreign body response and morphometric changes associated with mesh-style peripheral nerve cuffs
Abstract
Nerve cuffs have been used to anchor and protect penetrating electrodes in peripheral nerves and have been used as non-penetrating electrodes for neural recording and nerve stimulation. The material of choice for such applications is silicone, an inert synthetic biomaterial which elicits a minimal chronic foreign body response (FBR). While histological studies of solid silicone cuffs are available, to the best of our knowledge a comparison to other cuff designs is not well documented. Here, we describe the FBR and morphological changes that accompany nerve cuff implantation in the rat sciatic nerve by comparing a metallic mesh with and without a parylene coating to one made of silicone. Two months after implantation, we observed that such implants, irrespective of the cuff type, were associated with a persistent inflammatory response consisting of activated macrophages attached to the implant surfaces, which extended into the endoneurial space of the encapsulated nerve. We also observed foreign body giant cells in the epineurial space that were more prevalent in the mesh cohorts. The mesh cuff groups showed significant changes in several morphometric parameters that were not seen in the silicon group including reductions in nerve fiber packing density and a greater reduction of large diameter fibers. High magnification microscopy also showed greater evidence of foamy macrophages in the endoneurial space of the mesh implanted cohorts. Although the precise mechanisms are unknown, the results showed that mesh style nerve cuffs show a greater inflammatory response and had greater reductions in morphometric changes in the underlying nerve compared to silicone in the absence of a penetrating injury. Statement of significance While traditional silicone cuffs have been in use for decades, the inflammatory and morphometric effects of these cuffs on the underlying nerve have not been deeply studied. Further, manipulation of the foreign body response to nerve cuffs by using various materials and/or designs has not been well reported. Therefore, we report the inflammatory response around nerve cuffs of various materials and designs, as well as report morphometric parameters of the underlying nerve. These data provide important information regarding the potential for quantitative morphometric changes associated with the use of nerve cuffs, and, importantly, suggests that these changes are associated with the degree of inflammation associated with the cuff.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
PDMS cuffs develop lower degrees of trauma and FBR than cuffs made from other flexible materials such as metallic meshes.
“PDMS cuffs develop lower degrees of trauma and FBR than cuffs made from other flexible materials such as metallic meshes (Christensen and Tresco, 2018), matching the pattern seen in other low-stiffness materials (Liu et al., 2019, 2020).”
From Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics (2021) · cites this paper as Christensen and Tresco, 2018
Cites
A spiral nerve cuff electrode for peripheral nerve stimulation
Naples, G. G., Mortimer, J. T., Scheiner, A., & Sweeney, J. D. (1988) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/10.8670 · Cited by 415 · see citing works
Long-term stimulation and recording with a penetrating microelectrode array in cat sciatic nerve
Branner, A., Stein, R. B., Fernandez, E., Aoyagi, Y., & Normann, R. A. (2004) · IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1109/tbme.2003.820321 · Cited by 301 · see citing works
A review of portable FES-based neural orthoses for the correction of drop foot
Lyons, G. M., Sinkjaer, T., Burridge, J. H., & Wilcox, D. J. (2002) · IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering · doi:10.1109/tnsre.2002.806832 · Cited by 277 · see citing works
Chronic Response of the Rat Sciatic Nerve to the Flat Interface Nerve Electrode
Tyler, D. J., & Durand, D. M. (2003) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1114/1.1569263 · Cited by 144 · see citing works
The foreign body response to the Utah Slant Electrode Array in the cat sciatic nerve
Christensen, M. B., Pearce, S. M., Ledbetter, N. M., Warren, D. J., Clark, G. A., & Tresco, P. A. (2014) · Acta Biomaterialia · doi:10.1016/j.actbio.2014.07.010 · Cited by 135 · see citing works
Self-citationLarsen, J. O., Thomsen, M., Haugland, M., & Sinkjær, T. (1998) · Acta Neuropathologica · doi:10.1007/s004010050907 · Cited by 96 · see citing works
Castro, J., Negredo, P., & Avendaño, C. (2008) · Brain Research · doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2007.11.028 · Cited by 63 · see citing works
Malmstrom, J. A., McNaughton, T. G., & Horch, K. W. (1998) · Annals of Biomedical Engineering · doi:10.1114/1.35 · Cited by 50 · see citing works
Romero, E., Denef, J. F., Delbeke, J., Robert, A., & Veraart, C. (2001) · Medical & Biological Engineering & Computing · doi:10.1007/bf02345271 · Cited by 49 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Foreign Body Reaction to Implanted Biomaterials and Its Impact in Nerve Neuroprosthetics
Carnicer-Lombarte, A., Chen, S.-T., Malliaras, G. G., & Barone, D. G. (2021) · Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology · doi:10.3389/fbioe.2021.622524 · Cited by 454 · see citing works
“PDMS cuffs develop lower degrees of trauma and FBR than cuffs made from other flexible materials such as metallic meshes (Christensen and Tresco, 2018), matching the pattern seen in other low-stiffness materials (Liu et al.”
BackgroundA review for the peripheral nerve interface designer
Larson, C. E., & Meng, E. (2020) · Journal of Neuroscience Methods · doi:10.1016/j.jneumeth.2019.108523 · Cited by 133 · see citing works
Thin film multi-electrode softening cuffs for selective neuromodulation
González-González, M. A., Kanneganti, A., Joshi-Imre, A., Hernandez-Reynoso, A. G., Bendale, G., Modi, R., Ecker, M., Khurram, A., Cogan, S. F., Voit, W. E., et al. (2018) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-018-34566-6 · Cited by 97 · see citing works
- Authors
- Christensen, M. B., & Tresco, P. A.
- Affiliations
- University of Utah (US)
- Corresponding author
- Christensen, Michael B.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2018-02
- Volume
- 67
- Pages
- 79-86
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2772863835
- Cited by
- 19
- References
- 9
- Citations by year
- 2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 4 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 2
- FWCI
- 0.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Acta Biomaterialia (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- University of Utah
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Neurology › Vagus Nerve Stimulation Research
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Nerve injury and regeneration
- Keywords
- foreign body reaction, silicone, parylene coating, peripheral nerves, sciatic nerve, macrophage activation, foreign body giant cells, nerve morphometry, chronic inflammation, neural recording electrodes
- MeSH terms
- Animals, Biocompatible Materials, Foreign-Body Reaction, Male, Nerve Fibers, Peripheral Nerves, Rats, Inbred F344, Implants, Experimental
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review