The DOI matches its Crossref record; 11 of the 11 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings
Open accessAbstract
Globally, chronic wounds impose a notable burden to patients and healthcare systems. Such skin wounds are readily subjected to bacteria that provoke inflammation and hence challenge the healing process. Furthermore, bacteria induce infection impeding re-epithelialization and collagen synthesis. With an estimated global market of $20.4 billion by 2021, appropriate wound dressing materials e.g. those composed of biopolymers originating from nature, are capable of alleviating the infection incidence and of accelerating the healing process. Particularly, biopolymeric nanofibrous dressings are biocompatible and mostly biodegradable and biomimic the extracellular matrix structure. Such nanofibrous dressings provide a high surface area and the ability to deliver antibiotics and antibacterial agents locally into the wound milieu to control infection. In this regard, with the dangerous evolution of antibiotic resistant bacteria, antibiotic delivery systems are being gradually replaced with antibacterial biohybrid nanofibrous wound dressings. This emerging class of wound dressings comprises biopolymeric nanofibers containing antibacterial nanoparticles, nature-derived compounds and biofunctional agents. Here, the most recent (since 2015) developments of antibacterial biopolymeric nanofibrous wound dressings, particularly those made of biohybrids, are reviewed and their antibacterial efficiency is evaluated based on a comprehensive literature analysis. Lastly, the prospects and challenges are discussed to draw a roadmap for further progresses and to open up future research avenues in this area. STATEMENT OF SIGNIFICANCE: With a global market of $20.4 billion by 2021, skin wound dressings are a crucial segment of the wound care industry. As an advanced class of bioactive wound dressing materials, natural polymeric nanofibers loaded with antibacterial agents, e.g. antimicrobial nanoparticles/ions, nature-derived compounds and biofunctional agents, have shown a remarkable potential for replacement of their classic counterparts. Also, given the expanding concern regarding antibiotic resistant bacteria, such biohybrid nanofibrous wound dressings can outperform classical drug delivery systems. Here, an updated overview of the most recent (since 2015) developments of antibacterial biopolymeric nanofibrous wound dressings is presented. In this review, while discussing about the antibacterial efficiency of such systems, the prospects and challenges are highlighted to draw a roadmap for further progresses in this area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Mussel-inspired surface chemistry for multifunctional coatings
Lee, H., Dellatore, S. M., Miller, W. M., & Messersmith, P. B. (2007) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1147241 · Cited by 10,965
Antimicrobial peptides of multicellular organisms
Zasloff, M. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/415389a · Cited by 8,457
Gurtner, G. C., Werner, S., Barrandon, Y., & Longaker, M. T. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature07039 · Cited by 6,542
Giancotti, F. G., & Ruoslahti, E. (1999) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.285.5430.1028 · Cited by 3,869
Exploring and Engineering the Cell Surface Interface
Stevens, M. M., & George, J. H. (2005) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1106587 · Cited by 2,607
Barbey, R., Lavanant, L., Paripovic, D., Schüwer, N., Sugnaux, C., Tugulu, S., & Klok, H.-A. (2009) · Chemical Reviews · doi:10.1021/cr900045a · Cited by 1,753
Edwards, R., & Harding, K. G. (2004) · Current Opinion in Infectious Diseases · doi:10.1097/00001432-200404000-00004 · Cited by 1,099
Smiell, J. M., Wieman, T. J., Steed, D. L., Perry, B. H., Sampson, A. R., & Schwab, B. H. (1999) · Wound Repair and Regeneration · doi:10.1046/j.1524-475x.1999.00335.x · Cited by 454
Electrospun polymeric nanofibres as wound dressings: A review
Miguel, S. P., Figueira, D. R., Simões, D., Ribeiro, M. P., Coutinho, P., Ferreira, P., & Correia, I. J. (2018) · Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces · doi:10.1016/j.colsurfb.2018.05.011 · Cited by 362
Ghosal, K., Agatemor, C., Špitálsky, Z., Thomas, S., & Kny, E. (2019) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2018.10.117 · Cited by 278
Cited by
Alginate hydrogel dressings for advanced wound management
Zhang, M., & Zhao, X. (2020) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.07.311 · Cited by 616
Electrospun Medicated Nanofibers for Wound Healing: Review
Liu, X., Xu, H., Zhang, M., & Yu, D.-G. (2021) · Membranes · doi:10.3390/membranes11100770 · Cited by 311
Xu, J., Fang, H., Zheng, S., Li, L., Jiao, Z., Wang, H., Nie, Y., Liu, T., & Song, K. (2021) · International Journal of Biological Macromolecules · doi:10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.07.162 · Cited by 120
Wang, W., Jia, B., Xu, H., Li, Z., Qiao, L., Zhao, Y., Huang, H., Zhao, X., & Guo, B. (2023) · Chemical Engineering Journal · doi:10.1016/j.cej.2023.143362 · Cited by 85
Metadata
- Authors
- Homaeigohar, S., & Boccaccini, A. R.
- Venue
- Acta Biomaterialia
- Publisher
- Elsevier BV
- Published
- 2020-04
- Volume
- 107
- Pages
- 25-49
- ISSN
- 1742-7061 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W3007523428
- Cited by
- 605
- References
- 11
- FWCI
- 20.73
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.022
- The paper
- Homaeigohar, S., & Boccaccini, A. R. (2020). Antibacterial biohybrid nanofibers for wound dressings. Acta Biomaterialia. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actbio.2020.02.022
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.