Cited by 222Health disparities and outcomesAttachment and Relationship DynamicsHealth and Well-being Studies

The relationships between social support and loneliness: a meta-analysis and review

Open access
Zhang, Xing, Dong, Shenghong·2022·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

The loneliness of modern people is becoming more and more prominent, and has brought profoundly negative effects on mental health. Social support is an important predictor of loneliness. However, the size of the correlation reported by studies on the relation between social support and loneliness varies greatly. The aim of this meta-analysis is to determine the relation between social support and loneliness. One hundred and seventy-seven articles (N = 113,427) were identified, and robust variance estimation with random effects were used. As expected, higher levels of social support were negatively correlated with loneliness (r = -0.39). The association between social support and loneliness were also moderated by several variables. Specifically, the negative relationship between loneliness and social support among rural populations is stronger than that of urban populations in Chinese samples, the effect of perceived social support (r = -0.45) on loneliness is greater than that of other social supports (r = -0.36), and the friend support (r = -0.48) played a more important role in reducing loneliness than that of two other supports (family support: r = -0.34; significant other support: r = -0.40). The current results support robust links between social support and loneliness, emphasizing the important role of social support in reducing levels of loneliness, this may have some implications for future research and loneliness treatments.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2022.103616

Cites

39 of 39 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

8 of the 47 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 10

  1. Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P., & Rothstein, H. R. (2011). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Du, L. (2012). Perceived social support of high school students and the relationship of which and attribution style general self-efficacy. Master's thesis. In China master's theses full-text database.
  3. Kahn, R. L., & Antonucci, T. C. (1980). Convoys over the life course. Attachment, roles, and social support. In P. B. Baltes, & O. G. Brim (Eds.), Life-span development and behavior (pp. 254-283). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  4. Kuhirunyaratn, P., Pongpanich, S., Somrongthong, R., Love, E. J., & Chapman, R. S. (2007). Social support among elderly in Khon Kean Province, Thailand. Southeast Asian. Journal of Tropical Medicine & PublicHealth, 38(5), 936-946.
  5. Peplau, L., & Perlman, D. (1982). Perspectives on loneliness. In L. Peplau, & D. Perlman (Eds.), Loneliness: A sourcebook of current theory, research and therapy (pp. 1-20). USA: John Wiley.
  6. Xiang, Y., & Yao, H. (2016). The mode of social work intervention on isolation of rural left-behind elderly from the perspective of resilience. Journal of Huazhong Agricultural University (Social Science Edition), 126(6), 85-92.
  7. Ye, j. (2006). Perceived social support, enacted social support and depression in a sample of college students. Psychological Science (China)., 29(5), 1141-1143.
  8. Yip, W. (2010). Disparities in health care and health status: The urban-rural gap and beyond. In M. Whyte (Ed.), One country, two societies: Rural-urban inequality in contemporary China (pp. 147-165). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  9. Zhang, S., Zhang, Q., & Li, C. (2015). Meta-analytic review on the gender differences in perceived social support. Psychological Development and Education (China), 31(4), 393-401.
  10. Zhang, Y. (2018). Relationship on the influence of social support on health level of the elderly in urban and rural areas-empirical analysis based on Charls data (Master's thesis). China Master's Theses Full-text Database.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Zhang, X., & Dong, S.
Affiliations
Jiangxi Normal University (CN)
Corresponding author
Zhang, Xing
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2022-07
Volume
227
Pages
103616
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W4280498737
Cited by
222
References
47
Citations by year
2026: 75 · 2025: 82 · 2024: 44 · 2023: 19 · 2022: 2
FWCI
5.09
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
Jiangxi Normal University Yaohu Campus (JD20061)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Health › Health disparities and outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Attachment and Relationship Dynamics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Health and Well-being Studies
Keywords
social support, loneliness, perceived social support, friend support, family support, significant other support, urban-rural differences, Chinese adults, mental health
MeSH terms
Humans, Loneliness, Social Support, Asian People

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review