Cited by 4Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety StudiesGrit, Self-Efficacy, and MotivationBehavioral Health and Interventions

Beyond positive thinking: A randomized trial of mental contrasting with implementation intentions to curb academic procrastination

Open access
Zhou, Xiaoxue, Wider, Walton, Wu, Hao, Xu, Yong, Qin, Manping, Borromeo, Alex S.·2026·Acta Psychologica

Abstract

Academic procrastination is a pervasive challenge in higher education, particularly within low-structure, digitally mediated learning environments. This study investigates the efficacy of Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) as an intervention to reduce procrastination among undergraduate students in a private Chinese university. Grounded in the Temporal Decision Model, the study employed a randomized controlled design (N = 81) comparing MCII with a Positive Thinking Strategy (PTS) control. Three outcomes were assessed: task aversiveness, outcome utility, and willingness to initiate academic tasks, using pre-test, post-test, and one-week follow-up data. Results revealed that MCII significantly reduced task aversiveness and improved willingness to act relative to PTS, with effects sustained over time. Although both interventions enhanced outcome utility, MCII demonstrated superior retention. These findings offer theoretical validation of the dual-process model of procrastination and highlight the MCII's promise as a scalable, low-cost intervention that fosters emotional regulation and volitional planning in higher education. Implications for culturally responsive instructional practices and self-regulated learning strategies are discussed.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.actpsy.2025.106168

Cites

33 of 33 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Zhou, X., Wider, W., Wu, H., Xu, Y., Qin, M., & Borromeo, A. S.
Affiliations
  • INTI International University (MY)
  • Hechi University (CN)
  • Bulacan State University (PH)
Corresponding author
Wider, Walton
Venue
Acta Psychologica
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2026-02
Volume
262
Pages
106168
ISSN
0001-6918 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W7118311766
Cited by
4
References
33
Citations by year
2026: 4
FWCI
23.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Acta Psychologica (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) (submittedVersion, cc-by-sa)
Funders
  • Scientific Research and Technology Development Program of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region (AA24010001, 2024KY0624)
  • Education Department of Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Perfectionism, Procrastination, Anxiety Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Behavioral Health and Interventions
Keywords
academic procrastination, mental contrasting with implementation intentions, task aversiveness, willingness to act, intervention retention, student self-regulation, emotion regulation, undergraduate students, digital learning environments
MeSH terms
Procrastination, Adolescent, Adult, China, Female, Humans, Learning, Male, Students, Thinking, Universities, Intention, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review