Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 470

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 183 of the 183 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: A review

Askari, Meisam, Hutchins, David A., Thomas, Peter J., Astolfi, Lorenzo, Watson, Richard L., Abdi, Meisam, Ricci, Marco, Laureti, Stefano, Nie, Luzhen, Freear, Steven, Wildman, Ricky, Tuck, Christopher, Clarke, Matt, Woods, Emma, Clare, Adam T.·2020·Additive Manufacturing

Abstract

Abstract Metamaterials exhibit properties beyond those exhibited by conventional materials in conventional scenarios. These have been investigated both theoretically and experimentally at length. In many cases the underpinning physical understanding of metamaterials has greatly preceded our ability to manufacture constituent structures. However, the development of additive manufacturing techniques gives new possibilities for the fabrication of complex metamaterial structures, many of which cannot be realised through conventional fabrication methods. The literature to date contains contributions from a diverse group of researchers from the physical sciences, mathematics, and manufacturing technology in the creation of metamaterials for electromagnetic, acoustic and mechanical applications. It is proposed that additive manufacturing holds the key to realise the capabilities of this vibrant research community and permit the creation of new paradigms in fundamental structures but also exploitation through application. For this purpose, a literature review is presented which identifies key advances in metamaterials alongside additive manufacturing and proposes new opportunities for researchers to work together through intra/inter disciplinary research to realise structures which exhibit extraordinary behaviour(s). This review represents a comprehensive account of the state-of-the-art in the production of such metamaterials using additive manufacturing methods and highlights areas, which, based on trends observed in the literature, are worthy of further research and require a coordinated effort on behalf of the afore mentioned disciplines in order to advance the state-of-the-art.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.addma.2020.101562

Cites

183 of 183 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 183 references

Cited by

See all 470

Metadata

Authors
Askari, M., Hutchins, D. A., Thomas, P. J., Astolfi, L., Watson, R. L., Abdi, M., Ricci, M., Laureti, S., Nie, L., Freear, S., Wildman, R., Tuck, C., Clarke, M., Woods, E., & Clare, A. T.
Venue
Additive Manufacturing
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2020-12
Volume
36
Pages
101562
ISSN
  • 2214-7810 (ISSN-L)
  • 2214-8604
OpenAlex
W3086323056
Cited by
470
References
183
FWCI
26.69
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: A review. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101562
The paper
Askari, M., Hutchins, D. A., Thomas, P. J., Astolfi, L., Watson, R. L., Abdi, M., Ricci, M., Laureti, S., Nie, L., Freear, S., Wildman, R., Tuck, C., Clarke, M., Woods, E., & Clare, A. T. (2020). Additive manufacturing of metamaterials: A review. Additive Manufacturing. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addma.2020.101562

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.