Cited by 504

3D extracellular matrix mimics: fundamental concepts and role of materials chemistry to influence stem cell fate

Nicolas, Julien, Magli, Sofia, Rabbachin, Linda, Sampaolesi, Susanna, Nicotra, Francesco, Russo, Laura·2020·Biomacromolecules

Abstract

Synthetic 3D extracellular matrices (ECMs) find application in cell studies, regenerative medicine, and drug discovery. While cells cultured in a monolayer may exhibit unnatural behavior and develop very different phenotypes and genotypes than in vivo, great efforts in materials chemistry have been devoted to reproducing in vitro behavior in in vivo cell microenvironments. This requires fine-tuning the biochemical and structural actors in synthetic ECMs. This review will present the fundamentals of the ECM, cover the chemical and structural features of the scaffolds used to generate ECM mimics, discuss the nature of the signaling biomolecules required and exploited to generate bioresponsive cell microenvironments able to induce a specific cell fate, and highlight the synthetic strategies involved in creating functional 3D ECM mimics.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1021/acs.biomac.0c00045

Cites

16 of 16 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Additional ECM components are used as coating during cultivation to enhance cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation.

    “Neuronal cells, particularly those derived from stem cells, require a supportive ECM environment that mimics their natural niche to maintain their viability, morphology, and function, which is why additional ECM components are used as coating during cultivation to enhance cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation (Friedl and Brocker, 2000; Theocharis et al., 2016; Nicolas et al., 2020).”

    From Challenges and solutions in transitioning to animal-free standards: a comprehensive analysis of components in human cell-based developmental neurotoxicity assays (2026) · cites this paper as Nicolas et al., 2020

    Section 3 (page not provided) says ECM mimics can be used as surface coatings to promote cell adhesion. Section 2.1.2 says laminin is used as a coating to induce specific cell fates and functions and notes its role in neurite outgrowth. The passages do not establish that coatings enhance growth or that stem-cell-derived neuronal cells generally require such coatings to maintain viability, morphology, and function. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Neuronal cells, particularly those derived from stem cells, require a supportive ECM environment that mimics their natural niche to maintain their viability, morphology, and function.

    “Neuronal cells, particularly those derived from stem cells, require a supportive ECM environment that mimics their natural niche to maintain their viability, morphology, and function, which is why additional ECM components are used as coating during cultivation to enhance cell adhesion, growth, and differentiation (Friedl and Brocker, 2000; Theocharis et al., 2016; Nicolas et al., 2020).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 389

  1. Stocum, D. L. An Overview of Regenerative Biology. In Regenerative Biology and Medicine, 2nd ed.; Academic Press: Cambridge, UK, 2012; pp 3-20.
  2. Tibbitt, M. W.; Anseth, K. S. Hydrogels as Extracellular Matrix Mimics for 3D Cell Culture. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103 (4), 655- 663. · DOI · Paper page
  3. Abbott, A. Biology's New Dimension. Nature 2003, 424 (6951), 870-872. · DOI
  4. Pampaloni, F.; Reynaud, E. G.; Stelzer, E. H. K. The Third Dimension Bridges the Gap between Cell Culture and Live Tissue. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2007, 8 (10), 839-845. · DOI · Paper page
  5. Ceafalan, L. C.; Enciu, A.-M.; Fertig, T. E.; Popescu, B. O.; Gherghiceanu, M.; Hinescu, M. E.; Radu, E. Heterocellular Molecular Contacts in the Mammalian Stem Cell Niche. Eur. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 97 (6), 442-461. · DOI
  6. Domingues, M. J.; Cao, H.; Heazlewood, S. Y.; Cao, B.; Nilsson, S. K. Niche Extracellular Matrix Components and Their Influence on HSC. J. Cell. Biochem. 2017, 118 (8), 1984-1993. · DOI
  7. Hussey, G. S.; Dziki, J. L.; Badylak, S. F. Extracellular Matrix- Based Materials for Regenerative Medicine. Nat. Rev. Mater. 2018, 3 (7), 159-173. · DOI · Paper page
  8. Langhans, S. A. Three-Dimensional in Vitro Cell Culture Models in Drug Discovery and Drug Repositioning. Front. Pharmacol. 2018, 9, 6. · DOI · Paper page
  9. Parrish, J.; Lim, K. S.; Baer, K.; Hooper, G. J.; Woodfield, T. B. F. A 96-Well Microplate Bioreactor Platform Supporting Individual Dual Perfusion and High-Throughput Assessment of Simple or Biofabricated 3D Tissue Models. Lab Chip 2018, 18 (18), 2757- 2775. · DOI
  10. Antoni, D.; Burckel, H.; Josset, E.; Noel, G. Three-Dimensional Cell Culture: A Breakthrough in Vivo. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2015, 16 (3), 5517-5527. · DOI
  11. Caliari, S. R.; Burdick, J. A. A Practical Guide to Hydrogels for Cell Culture. Nat. Methods 2016, 13 (5), 405-414. · DOI · Paper page
  12. Wodarz, A.; Naẗhke, I. Cell Polarity in Development and Cancer. Nat. Cell Biol. 2007, 9 (9), 1016-1024. · DOI
  13. Morrison, S. J.; Kimble, J. Asymmetric and Symmetric Stem- Cell Divisions in Development and Cancer. Nature 2006, 441 (7097), 1068-1074. · DOI
  14. Lee, M.; Vasioukhin, V. Cell Polarity and Cancer-Cell and Tissue Polarity as a Non-Canonical Tumor Suppressor. J. Cell Sci. 2008, 121 (8), 1141-1150. · DOI
  15. Guilak, F.; Cohen, D. M.; Estes, B. T.; Gimble, J. M.; Liedtke, W.; Chen, C. S. Control of Stem Cell Fate by Physical Interactions with the Extracellular Matrix. Cell Stem Cell 2009, 5 (1), 17-26. · DOI
  16. Cha, C.; Liechty, W. B.; Khademhosseini, A.; Peppas, N. A. Designing Biomaterials to Direct Stem Cell Fate. ACS Nano 2012, 6 (11), 9353-9358. · DOI
  17. Kshitiz; Park, J.; Kim, P.; Helen, W.; Engler, A. J.; Levchenko, A.; Kim, D.-H. Control of Stem Cell Fate and Function by Engineering Physical Microenvironments. Integr. Biol. (Camb). 2012, 4 (9), 1008-1018. · DOI
  18. Lewis, K. J. R.; Tibbitt, M. W.; Zhao, Y.; Branchfield, K.; Sun, X.; Balasubramaniam, V.; Anseth, K. S. In Vitro Model Alveoli from Photodegradable Microsphere Templates. Biomater. Sci. 2015, 3 (6), 821-832. · DOI
  19. Guvendiren, M.; Burdick, J. A. Engineering Synthetic Hydrogel Microenvironments to Instruct Stem Cells. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2013, 24 (5), 841-846. · DOI
  20. Gattazzo, F.; Urciuolo, A.; Bonaldo, P. Extracellular Matrix: A Dynamic Microenvironment for Stem Cell Niche. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Gen. Subj. 2014, 1840 (8), 2506-2519. · DOI
  21. Herrmann, D.; Conway, J. R. W.; Vennin, C.; Magenau, A.; Hughes, W. E.; Morton, J. P.; Timpson, P. Three-Dimensional Cancer Models Mimic Cell-Matrix Interactions in the Tumour Microenviron- ment. Carcinogenesis 2014, 35 (8), 1671-1679. · DOI
  22. Multhaupt, H. A. B.; Leitinger, B.; Gullberg, D.; Couchman, J. R. Extracellular Matrix Component Signaling in Cancer. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2016, 97, 28-40. · DOI
  23. Xin, T.; Greco, V.; Myung, P. Hardwiring Stem Cell Communication through Tissue Structure. Cell 2016, 164 (6), 1212-1225. · DOI
  24. Unlu, G.; Levic, D. S.; Melville, D. B.; Knapik, E. W. Trafficking Mechanisms of Extracellular Matrix Macromolecules: Insights from Vertebrate Development and Human Diseases. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2014, 47, 57-67. · DOI
  25. Schlie-Wolter, S.; Ngezahayo, A.; Chichkov, B. N. The Selective Role of ECM Components on Cell Adhesion, Morphology, Proliferation and Communication in Vitro. Exp. Cell Res. 2013, 319 (10), 1553-1561. · DOI
  26. Bonnans, C.; Chou, J.; Werb, Z. Remodelling the Extracellular Matrix in Development and Disease. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15 (12), 786-801. · DOI · Paper page
  27. Ricard-Blum, S. The Collagen Family. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3 (1), No. a004978. · DOI · Paper page
  28. Dzamba, B. J.; DeSimone, D. W. Extracellular Matrix (ECM) and the Sculpting of Embryonic Tissues. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2018, 130, 245-274. · DOI
  29. Mouw, J. K.; Ou, G.; Weaver, V. M. Extracellular Matrix Assembly: A Multiscale Deconstruction. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15 (12), 771-785. · DOI · Paper page
  30. Somaiah, C.; Kumar, A.; Mawrie, D.; Sharma, A.; Patil, S. D.; Bhattacharyya, J.; Swaminathan, R.; Jaganathan, B. G. Collagen Promotes Higher Adhesion, Survival and Proliferation of Mesen- chymal Stem Cells. PLoS One 2015, 10 (12), No. e0145068. · DOI
  31. Rasmussen, C. H.; Petersen, D. R.; Moeller, J. B.; Hansson, M.; Dufva, M. Collagen Type I Improves the Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells towards Definitive Endoderm. PLoS One 2015, 10 (12), No. e0145389. · DOI
  32. Thomas, D.; Fontana, G.; Chen, X.; Sanz-Nogues, C.; Zeugolis, D. I.; Dockery, P.; O'Brien, T.; Pandit, A. A Shape-Controlled Tuneable Microgel Platform to Modulate Angiogenic Paracrine Responses in Stem Cells. Biomaterials 2014, 35 (31), 8757-8766. · DOI
  33. Sapudom, J.; Pompe, T. Biomimetic Tumor Microenviron- ments Based on Collagen Matrices. Biomater. Sci. 2018, 6 (8), 2009- 2024. · DOI
  34. Chattopadhyay, S.; Raines, R. T. Review Collagen-Based Biomaterials for Wound Healing. Biopolymers 2014, 101 (8), 821- 833. · DOI · Paper page
  35. Browne, S.; Zeugolis, D. I.; Pandit, A. Collagen: Finding a Solution for the Source. Tissue Eng., Part A 2013, 19 (13-14), 1491- 1494. · DOI
  36. Avila Rodrı ́guez, M. I.; Rodrı ́guez Barroso, L. G.; Sańchez, M. L. Collagen: A review on its sources and potential cosmetic applications. J. Cosmet. Dermatol. 2018, 17 (1), 20-26, DOI: 10.1111/jocd.12450. · DOI
  37. Baez, J.; Olsen, D.; Polarek, J. W. Recombinant Microbial Systems for the Production of Human Collagen and Gelatin. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2005, 69 (3), 245-252. · DOI
  38. Chen, E. A.; Lin, Y.-S. Using Synthetic Peptides and Recombinant Collagen to Understand DDR-Collagen Interactions. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2019, 1866 (11), 118458. · DOI
  39. Browning, K. N. Extracellular Matrix Proteins in the Gastrointestinal Tract: More than a Supporting Role. J. Physiol. 2018, 596 (17), 3831-3832. · DOI
  40. Kim, S.-H.; Turnbull, J.; Guimond, S. Extracellular Matrix and Cell Signalling: The Dynamic Cooperation of Integrin, Proteoglycan and Growth Factor Receptor. J. Endocrinol. 2011, 209 (2), 139-151. · DOI
  41. Pankov, R.; Yamada, K. M. Fibronectin at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2002, 115 (20), 3861-3863. · DOI
  42. Occhetta, P.; Isu, G.; Lemme, M.; Conficconi, C.; Oertle, P.; Raz, C.; Visone, R.; Cerino, G.; Plodinec, M.; Rasponi, M.; Marsano, A. A Three-Dimensional in Vitro Dynamic Micro-Tissue Model of Cardiac Scar Formation. Integr. Biol. 2018, 10 (3), 174-183. · DOI
  43. Madl, C. M.; Katz, L. M.; Heilshorn, S. C. Bio-Orthogonally Crosslinked, Engineered Protein Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanics and Biochemistry for Cell Encapsulation. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2016, 26 (21), 3612-3620. · DOI · Paper page
  44. Herklotz, M.; Prewitz, M. C.; Bidan, C. M.; Dunlop, J. W. C.; Fratzl, P.; Werner, C. Availability of Extracellular Matrix Biopolymers and Differentiation State of Human Mesenchymal Stem Cells Determine Tissue-like Growth in Vitro. Biomaterials 2015, 60, 121-129. · DOI
  45. Witjas, F. M. R.; van den Berg, B. M.; van den Berg, C. W.; Engelse, M. A.; Rabelink, T. J. Concise Review: The Endothelial Cell Extracellular Matrix Regulates Tissue Homeostasis and Repair. Stem Cells Transl. Med. 2019, 8 (4), 375-382. · DOI
  46. Macdonald, P. R.; Lustig, A.; Steinmetz, M. O.; Kammerer, R. A. Laminin Chain Assembly Is Regulated by Specific Coiled-Coil Interactions. J. Struct. Biol. 2010, 170 (2), 398-405. · DOI
  47. Beck, K.; Hunter, I.; Engel, J. Structure and Function of Laminin: Anatomy of a Multidomain Glycoprotein. FASEB J. 1990, 4 (2), 148-160. · DOI
  48. Hallmann, R.; Horn, N.; Selg, M.; Wendler, O.; Pausch, F.; Sorokin, L. M. Expression and Function of Laminins in the Embryonic and Mature Vasculature. Physiol. Rev. 2005, 85 (3), 979-1000. · DOI
  49. Tanzer, M. L.; Chandrasekaran, S.; Dean, J. W., 3rd; Giniger, M. S. Role of Laminin Carbohydrates on Cellular Interactions. Kidney Int. 1993, 43 (1), 66-72. · DOI
  50. Gunay, G.; Sever, M.; Tekinay, A. B.; Guler, M. O. Three- Dimensional Laminin Mimetic Peptide Nanofiber Gels for In Vitro Neural Differentiation. Biotechnol. J. 2017, 12 (12), 1700080.
  51. Werner, S.; Huck, O.; Frisch, B.; Vautier, D.; Elkaim, R.; Voegel, J. C.; Brunel, G.; Tenenbaum, H. The Effect of Micro- structured Surfaces and Laminin-Derived Peptide Coatings on Soft Tissue Interactions with Titanium Dental Implants. Biomaterials 2009, 30 (12), 2291-2301. · DOI
  52. Hadavi, E.; Leijten, J.; Engelse, M.; de Koning, E.; Jonkheijm, P.; Karperien, M.; van Apeldoorn, A. Microwell Scaffolds Using Collagen-IV and Laminin-111 Lead to Improved Insulin Secretion of Human Islets. Tissue Eng., Part C 2019, 25 (2), 71-81. · DOI
  53. Li, G.; Chen, K.; You, D.; Xia, M.; Li, W.; Fan, S.; Chai, R.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Sun, S. Laminin-Coated Electrospun Regenerated Silk Fibroin Mats Promote Neural Progenitor Cell Proliferation, Differentiation, and Survival in Vitro. Front. Bioeng. Biotechnol. 2019, 7, 190. · DOI
  54. Yao, L.; Damodaran, G.; Nikolskaya, N.; Gorman, A. M.; Windebank, A.; Pandit, A. The Effect of Laminin Peptide Gradient in Enzymatically Cross-Linked Collagen Scaffolds on Neurite Growth. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2009, 92A (2), 484-492. · DOI
  55. Pandit, A.; Damodaran, G.; Collighan, R.; Griffin, M. Tethering a Laminin Peptide to a Crosslinked Collagen Scaffold for Biofunctionality. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2009, 89A (4), 1001-1010. · DOI
  56. Jain, R.; Roy, S. Designing a Bioactive Scaffold from Coassembled Collagen-Laminin Short Peptide Hydrogels for Controlling Cell Behaviour. RSC Adv. 2019, 9 (66), 38745-38759. · DOI
  57. Neal, R. A.; McClugage, S. G.; Link, M. C.; Sefcik, L. S.; Ogle, R. C.; Botchwey, E. A. Laminin Nanofiber Meshes That Mimic Morphological Properties and Bioactivity of Basement Membranes. Tissue Eng., Part C 2009, 15 (1), 11-21. · DOI
  58. Miller, G. M.; Hsieh-Wilson, L. C. Sugar-Dependent Modulation of Neuronal Development, Regeneration, and Plasticity by Chondroitin Sulfate Proteoglycans. Exp. Neurol. 2015, 274, 115- 125. · DOI
  59. Schwartz, N. B.; Domowicz, M. S. Proteoglycans in Brain Development and Pathogenesis. FEBS Lett. 2018, 592 (23), 3791- 3805. · DOI
  60. Iozzo, R. V.; Schaefer, L. Proteoglycan Form and Function: A Comprehensive Nomenclature of Proteoglycans. Matrix Biol. 2015, 42, 11-55. · DOI
  61. Ahmed, M.; Ffrench-Constant, C. Extracellular Matrix Regulation of Stem Cell Behavior. Curr. stem cell reports 2016, 2 (3), 197-206. · DOI
  62. Bilezikian, J. P., Raisz, L. G., Martin, T. J. B. T., Eds.; Academic Press: San Diego, CA, US, 2008; Vol. 1, pp 335-349.
  63. Gubbiotti, M. A.; Vallet, S. D.; Ricard-Blum, S.; Iozzo, R. V. Decorin Interacting Network: A Comprehensive Analysis of Decorin- Binding Partners and Their Versatile Functions. Matrix Biol. 2016, 55, 7-21. · DOI
  64. Roskelley, C. D.; Srebrow, A.; Bissell, M. J. A Hierarchy of ECM-Mediated Signalling Regulates Tissue-Specific Gene Expression. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1995, 7 (5), 736-747. · DOI
  65. Spencer, V. A.; Xu, R.; Bissell, M. J. Extracellular Matrix, Nuclear and Chromatin Structure, and Gene Expression in Normal Tissues and Malignant Tumors: A Work in Progress. Adv. Cancer Res. 2007, 97, 275-294. · DOI
  66. Donnelly, H.; Salmeron-Sanchez, M.; Dalby, M. J. Designing Stem Cell Niches for Differentiation and Self-Renewal. J. R. Soc., Interface 2018, 15 (145), 20180388. · DOI
  67. Frantz, C.; Stewart, K. M.; Weaver, V. M. The Extracellular Matrix at a Glance. J. Cell Sci. 2010, 123 (24), 4195-4200. · DOI · Paper page
  68. Lu, P.; Takai, K.; Weaver, V. M.; Werb, Z. Extracellular Matrix Degradation and Remodeling in Development and Disease. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3 (12), No. a005058. · DOI · Paper page
  69. Schultz, G. S.; Wysocki, A. Interactions between Extracellular Matrix and Growth Factors in Wound Healing. Wound Repair Regen. 2009, 17 (2), 153-162. · DOI · Paper page
  70. Ozbek, S.; Balasubramanian, P. G.; Chiquet-Ehrismann, R.; Tucker, R. P.; Adams, J. C. The Evolution of Extracellular Matrix. Mol. Biol. Cell 2010, 21 (24), 4300-4305. · DOI · Paper page
  71. Cox, T. R.; Erler, J. T. Remodeling and Homeostasis of the Extracellular Matrix: Implications for Fibrotic Diseases and Cancer. Dis. Models & Mech. 2011, 4 (2), 165-178. · DOI · Paper page
  72. Kass, L.; Erler, J. T.; Dembo, M.; Weaver, V. M. Mammary Epithelial Cell: Influence of Extracellular Matrix Composition and Organization during Development and Tumorigenesis. Int. J. Biochem. Cell Biol. 2007, 39 (11), 1987-1994. · DOI
  73. Burgos-Panadero, R.; Lucantoni, F.; Gamero-Sandemetrio, E.; Cruz-Merino, L. de la; A ́lvaro, T.; Noguera, R. The Tumour Microenvironment as an Integrated Framework to Understand Cancer Biology. Cancer Lett. 2019, 461, 112-122. · DOI
  74. Marsico, G.; Russo, L.; Quondamatteo, F.; Pandit, A. Glycosylation and Integrin Regulation in Cancer. Trends in Cancer 2018, 4 (8), 537-552. · DOI
  75. Lynch, M.; Barallobre-Barreiro, J.; Jahangiri, M.; Mayr, M. Vascular Proteomics in Metabolic and Cardiovascular Diseases. J. Intern. Med. 2016, 280 (4), 325-338. · DOI
  76. Naba, A.; Clauser, K. R.; Ding, H.; Whittaker, C. A.; Carr, S. A.; Hynes, R. O. The Extracellular Matrix: Tools and Insights for the "Omics" Era. Matrix Biol. 2016, 49, 10-24. · DOI · Paper page
  77. Hynes, R. O. The Extracellular Matrix: Not Just Pretty Fibrils. Science (Washington, DC, U. S.) 2009, 326 (5957), 1216-1219. · DOI · Paper page
  78. Shologu, N.; Szegezdi, E.; Lowery, A.; Kerin, M.; Pandit, A.; Zeugolis, D. I. Recreating Complex Pathophysiologies in Vitro with Extracellular Matrix Surrogates for Anticancer Therapeutics Screen- ing. Drug Discovery Today 2016, 21 (9), 1521-1531. · DOI
  79. Cigognini, D.; Gaspar, D.; Kumar, P.; Satyam, A.; Alagesan, S.; Sanz-Nogueś, C.; Griffin, M.; O'Brien, T.; Pandit, A.; Zeugolis, D. I. Macromolecular Crowding Meets Oxygen Tension in Human Mesenchymal Stem Cell Culture -A Step Closer to Physiologically Relevant in Vitro Organogenesis. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6 (1), 30746. · DOI
  80. Iskratsch, T.; Wolfenson, H.; Sheetz, M. P. Appreciating Force and Shape-the Rise of Mechanotransduction in Cell Biology. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2014, 15 (12), 825-833. · DOI · Paper page
  81. Farge, E. Mechanotransduction in Development. Curr. Top. Dev. Biol. 2011, 95, 243-265. · DOI
  82. Broders-Bondon, F.; Nguyen Ho-Bouldoires, T. H.; Fernandez- Sanchez, M.-E.; Farge, E. Mechanotransduction in Tumor Pro- gression: The Dark Side of the Force. J. Cell Biol. 2018, 217 (5), 1571-1587. · DOI · Paper page
  83. Marsico, G.; Russo, L.; Quondamatteo, F.; Pandit, A. Glycosylation and Integrin Regulation in Cancer. Trends in Cancer 2018, 4 (8), 537-552. · DOI
  84. Desgrosellier, J. S.; Cheresh, D. A. Integrins in Cancer: Biological Implications and Therapeutic Opportunities. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2010, 10 (1), 9-22. · DOI
  85. Hynes, R. O. Integrins: Bidirectional, Allosteric Signaling Machines. Cell 2002, 110 (6), 673-687. · DOI
  86. Ginsberg, M. H.; Du, X.; Plow, E. F. Inside-out Integrin Signalling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1992, 4 (5), 766-771. · DOI
  87. Weber, G. F.; Bjerke, M. A.; DeSimone, D. W. Integrins and Cadherins Join Forces to Form Adhesive Networks. J. Cell Sci. 2011, 124 (8), 1183-1193. · DOI
  88. Leitinger, B. Discoidin Domain Receptor Functions in Physiological and Pathological Conditions. Int. Rev. Cell Mol. Biol. 2014, 310, 39-87. · DOI
  89. Henry, M. D.; Campbell, K. P. Dystroglycan: An Extracellular Matrix Receptor Linked to the Cytoskeleton. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1996, 8 (5), 625-631. · DOI
  90. Alberts, B.; Johnson, A.; Lewis, J.; Raff, M.; Roberts, K.; Walter, P. Mol. Biol. Cell, 4th ed.; Garland Science; New York, 2003; Vol. 91.
  91. Couchman, J. R. Syndecans: Proteoglycan Regulators of Cell- Surface Microdomains? Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4 (12), 926- 937. · DOI
  92. Chung, H.; Multhaupt, H. A. B.; Oh, E.-S.; Couchman, J. R. Minireview: Syndecans and Their Crucial Roles during Tissue Regeneration. FEBS Lett. 2016, 590 (15), 2408-2417. · DOI
  93. De Rossi, G.; Whiteford, J. R. Syndecans in Angiogenesis and Endothelial Cell Biology. Biochem. Soc. Trans. 2014, 42 (6), 1643- 1646. · DOI
  94. Misra, S.; Hascall, V. C.; Markwald, R. R.; Ghatak, S. Interactions between Hyaluronan and Its Receptors (CD44, RHAMM) Regulate the Activities of Inflammation and Cancer. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 201. · DOI
  95. Ponta, H.; Sherman, L.; Herrlich, P. A. CD44: From Adhesion Molecules to Signalling Regulators. Nat. Rev. Mol. Cell Biol. 2003, 4 (1), 33-45. · DOI
  96. Brown, G. D.; Willment, J. A.; Whitehead, L. C-Type Lectins in Immunity and Homeostasis. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 2018, 18 (6), 374-389. · DOI
  97. Gabius, H.-J.; Andre, S.; Jimenez-Barbero, J.; Romero, A.; Solis, D. From Lectin Structure to Functional Glycomics: Principles of the Sugar Code. Trends Biochem. Sci. 2011, 36 (6), 298-313. · DOI · Paper page
  98. Kawamura, K.; Fujiwara, S.; Sugino, Y. M. Budding-Specific Lectin Induced in Epithelial Cells Is an Extracellular Matrix Component for Stem Cell Aggregation in Tunicates. Development 1991, 113 (3), 995-1005.
  99. Melin Furst, C.; Morgelin, M.; Vadstrup, K.; Heinegard, D.; Aspberg, A.; Blom, A. M. The C-Type Lectin of the Aggrecan G3 Domain Activates Complement. PLoS One 2013, 8 (4), No. e61407. (107 · DOI
  100. Pinho, S. S.; Reis, C. A. Glycosylation in Cancer: Mechanisms and Clinical Implications. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2015, 15 (9), 540-555. · DOI
  101. Frangogiannis, N. G. Galectin-3 in the Fibrotic Response: Cellular Targets and Molecular Mechanisms. Int. J. Cardiol. 2018, 258, 226-227. · DOI
  102. Jung, T. Y.; Jung, S.; Ryu, H. H.; Jeong, Y. Il; Jin, Y. H.; Jin, S. G.; Kim, I. Y.; Kang, S. S.; Kim, H. S. Role of Galectin-1 in Migration and Invasion of Human Glioblastoma Multiforme Cell Lines: Laboratory Investigation. J. Neurosurg. 2008, 109 (2), 273-284. · DOI
  103. Wan, L.; Yang, R. Y.; Liu, F. T. Galectin-12 in Cellular Differentiation, Apoptosis and Polarization. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2018, 19 (1), 176. · DOI
  104. Iacobini, C.; Fantauzzi, C. B.; Pugliese, G.; Menini, S. Role of Galectin-3 in Bone Cell Differentiation, Bone Pathophysiology and Vascular Osteogenesis. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2017, 18 (11), 2481. · DOI
  105. He, J.; Baum, L. G. Galectin Interactions with Extracellular Matrix and Effects on Cellular Function. Methods Enzymol. 2006, 417, 247-256. · DOI
  106. Zick, Y.; Eisenstein, M.; Goren, R. A.; Hadari, Y. R.; Levy, Y.; Ronen, D. Role of Galectin-8 as a Modulator of Cell Adhesion and Cell Growth. Glycoconjugate J. 2002, 19 (7-9), 517-526. · DOI
  107. Levy, Y.; Arbel-Goren, R.; Hadari, Y. R.; Eshhar, S.; Ronen, D.; Elhanany, E.; Geiger, B.; Zick, Y. Galectin-8 Functions as a Matricellular Modulator of Cell Adhesion. J. Biol. Chem. 2001, 276 (33), 31285-31295. · DOI
  108. Ruvolo, P. P. Galectin 3 as a Guardian of the Tumor Microenvironment. Biochim. Biophys. Acta, Mol. Cell Res. 2016, 1863 (3), 427-437. · DOI
  109. Unverzagt, C.; Kajihara, Y. Chemical Assembly of N- Glycoproteins: A Refined Toolbox to Address a Ubiquitous Posttranslational Modification. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, 42 (10), 4408-4420. · DOI
  110. Canales, A.; Boos, I.; Perkams, L.; Karst, L.; Luber, T.; Karagiannis, T.; Domínguez, G.; Canãda, F. J.; Peŕez-Castells, J.; Haüssinger, D.; Unverzagt, C.; Jimeńez-Barbero, J. Breaking the Limits in Analyzing Carbohydrate Recognition by NMR Spectrosco- py: Resolving Branch-Selective Interaction of a Tetra-Antennary N- Glycan with Lectins. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2017, 56 (47), 14987- 14991. · DOI
  111. Friedl, P.; Brocker, E. B. The Biology of Cell Locomotion within Three-Dimensional Extracellular Matrix. Cell. Mol. Life Sci. 2000, 57 (1), 41-64. · DOI
  112. Campbell, I. D.; Humphries, M. J. Integrin Structure, Activation, and Interactions. Cold Spring Harbor Perspect. Biol. 2011, 3 (3), No. a004994. (120 · DOI
  113. Vogel, W. F.; Abdulhussein, R.; Ford, C. E. Sensing Extracellular Matrix: An Update on Discoidin Domain Receptor Function. Cell. Signalling 2006, 18 (8), 1108-1116. · DOI
  114. Afratis, N. A.; Nikitovic, D.; Multhaupt, H. A. B.; Theocharis, A. D.; Couchman, J. R.; Karamanos, N. K. Syndecans -Key Regulators of Cell Signaling and Biological Functions. FEBS J. 2017, 284 (1), 27-41. · DOI
  115. Montanaro, F.; Lindenbaum, M.; Carbonetto, S. α- Dystroglycan Is a Laminin Receptor Involved in Extracellular Matrix Assembly on Myotubes and Muscle Cell Viability. J. Cell Biol. 1999, 145 (6), 1325-1340. · DOI
  116. McClenahan, F. K.; Sharma, H.; Shan, X.; Eyermann, C.; Colognato, H. Dystroglycan Suppresses Notch to Regulate Stem Cell Niche Structure and Function in the Developing Postnatal Subventricular Zone. Dev. Cell 2016, 38 (5), 548-566. · DOI
  117. Boscher, C.; Dennis, J. W.; Nabi, I. R. Glycosylation, Galectins and Cellular Signaling. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 2011, 23 (4), 383-392. · DOI
  118. Di Lella, S.; Sundblad, V.; Cerliani, J. P.; Guardia, C. M.; Estrin, D. A.; Vasta, G. R.; Rabinovich, G. A. When Galectins Recognize Glycans: From Biochemistry to Physiology and Back Again. Biochemistry 2011, 50 (37), 7842-7857. · DOI
  119. Ferrari, L. F.; Araldi, D.; Bogen, O.; Levine, J. D. Extracellular Matrix Hyaluronan Signals via Its CD44 Receptor in the Increased Responsiveness to Mechanical Stimulation. Neuroscience 2016, 324, 390-398. · DOI
  120. Menter, D. G.; Kopetz, S.; Hawk, E.; Sood, A. K.; Loree, J. M.; Gresele, P.; Honn, K. V. Platelet "First Responders" in Wound Response, Cancer, and Metastasis. Cancer Metastasis Rev. 2017, 36 (2), 199-213. · DOI
  121. Induruwa, I.; Moroi, M.; Bonna, A.; Malcor, J. D.; Howes, J. M.; Warburton, E. A.; Farndale, R. W.; Jung, S. M. Platelet Collagen Receptor Glycoprotein VI-Dimer Recognizes Fibrinogen and Fibrin through Their D-Domains, Contributing to Platelet Adhesion and Activation during Thrombus Formation. J. Thromb. Haemostasis 2018, 16 (2), 389-404. · DOI
  122. Yue, B. Biology of the Extracellular Matrix: An Overview. J. Glaucoma 2014, 23 (8), S20-S23. · DOI · Paper page
  123. Engel, J. Common Structural Motifs in Proteins of the Extracellular Matrix. Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 1991, 3 (5), 779-785. · DOI
  124. Wang, F.; Li, Y.; Shen, Y.; Wang, A.; Wang, S.; Xie, T. The Functions and Applications of RGD in Tumor Therapy and Tissue Engineering. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2013, 14 (7), 13447-13462. · DOI
  125. Huettner, N.; Dargaville, T. R.; Forget, A. Discovering Cell- Adhesion Peptides in Tissue Engineering: Beyond RGD. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36 (4), 372-383. · DOI
  126. Mager, M. D.; LaPointe, V.; Stevens, M. M. Exploring and Exploiting Chemistry at the Cell Surface. Nat. Chem. 2011, 3 (8), 582-589. · DOI
  127. Panseri, S.; Russo, L.; Montesi, M.; Taraballi, F.; Cunha, C.; Marcacci, M.; Cipolla, L. Bioactivity of Surface Tethered Osteogenic Growth Peptide Motifs. MedChemComm 2014, 5 (7), 899-903. · DOI
  128. Papaleo, E.; Russo, L.; Shaikh, N.; Cipolla, L.; Fantucci, P.; De Gioia, L. Molecular Dynamics Investigation of Cyclic Natriuretic Peptides: Dynamic Properties Reflect Peptide Activity. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2010, 28 (8), 834-841. · DOI
  129. Ucuzian, A. A.; Gassman, A. A.; East, A. T.; Greisler, H. P. Molecular Mediators of Angiogenesis. J. Burn Care Res. 2010, 31 (1), 158-175. · DOI
  130. Akar, B.; Jiang, B.; Somo, S. I.; Appel, A. A.; Larson, J. C.; Tichauer, K. M.; Brey, E. M. Biomaterials with Persistent Growth Factor Gradients in Vivo Accelerate Vascularized Tissue Formation. Biomaterials 2015, 72, 61-73. · DOI
  131. Rouwkema, J.; Khademhosseini, A. Vascularization and Angiogenesis in Tissue Engineering: Beyond Creating Static Net- works. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34 (9), 733-745. · DOI · Paper page
  132. Smyth, S. S.; Patterson, C. Tiny Dancers: The Integrin- Growth Factor Nexus in Angiogenic Signaling. J. Cell Biol. 2002, 158 (1), 17-21. · DOI
  133. Magro, R. D.; Cox, A.; Zambelli, V.; Mancini, S.; Masserini, M.; Re, F. The Ability of Liposomes, Tailored for Blood-Brain Barrier Targeting, to Reach the Brain Is Dramatically Affected by the Disease State. Nanomedicine (London, U. K.) 2018, 13 (6), 585-594. · DOI
  134. Wilgus, T. A. Growth Factor-Extracellular Matrix Interactions Regulate Wound Repair. Adv. wound care 2012, 1 (6), 249-254. · DOI
  135. Korsensky, L.; Ron, D. Regulation of FGF Signaling: Recent Insights from Studying Positive and Negative Modulators. Semin. Cell Dev. Biol. 2016, 53, 101-114. · DOI
  136. Ikuta, T.; Ariga, H.; Matsumoto, K. Extracellular Matrix Tenascin-X in Combination with Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor B Enhances Endothelial Cell Proliferation. Genes Cells 2000, 5 (11), 913-927. · DOI
  137. Zhu, J.; Clark, R. A. F. Fibronectin at Select Sites Binds Multiple Growth Factors and Enhances Their Activity: Expansion of the Collaborative ECM-GF Paradigm. J. Invest. Dermatol. 2014, 134 (4), 895-901. · DOI
  138. Singh, B.; Carpenter, G.; Coffey, R. J. EGF Receptor Ligands: Recent Advances. F1000Research 2016, 5, 2270. · DOI
  139. Rodrigues, J. G.; Balmana, M.; Macedo, J. A.; Pocas, J.; Fernandes, A.; de-Freitas-Junior, J. C. M.; Pinho, S. S.; Gomes, J.; Magalhaes, A.; Gomes, C.; Mereiter, S.; Reis, C. A. Glycosylation in Cancer: Selected Roles in Tumour Progression, Immune Modulation and Metastasis. Cell. Immunol. 2018, 333, 46-57. · DOI
  140. Bishop, J. R.; Schuksz, M.; Esko, J. D. Heparan Sulphate Proteoglycans Fine-Tune Mammalian Physiology. Nature 2007, 446 (7139), 1030-1037. · DOI · Paper page
  141. Haylock-Jacobs, S.; Keough, M. B.; Lau, L.; Yong, V. W. Chondroitin Sulphate Proteoglycans: Extracellular Matrix Proteins That Regulate Immunity of the Central Nervous System. Autoimmun. Rev. 2011, 10 (12), 766-772. · DOI
  142. Ouasti, S.; Donno, R.; Cellesi, F.; Sherratt, M. J.; Terenghi, G.; Tirelli, N. Network Connectivity, Mechanical Properties and Cell Adhesion for Hyaluronic Acid/PEG Hydrogels. Biomaterials 2011, 32 (27), 6456-6470. · DOI
  143. Gerecht, S.; Burdick, J. A.; Ferreira, L. S.; Townsend, S. A.; Langer, R.; Vunjak-Novakovic, G. Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogel for Controlled Self-Renewal and Differentiation of Human Embryonic Stem Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2007, 104 (27), 11298- 11303. · DOI
  144. Seidlits, S. K.; Khaing, Z. Z.; Petersen, R. R.; Nickels, J. D.; Vanscoy, J. E.; Shear, J. B.; Schmidt, C. E. The Effects of Hyaluronic Acid Hydrogels with Tunable Mechanical Properties on Neural Progenitor Cell Differentiation. Biomaterials 2010, 31 (14), 3930- 3940. · DOI
  145. Kochlamazashvili, G.; Henneberger, C.; Bukalo, O.; Dvoretskova, E.; Senkov, O.; Lievens, P. M.-J.; Westenbroek, R.; Engel, A. K.; Catterall, W. A.; Rusakov, D. A.; Schachner, M.; Dityatev, A. The Extracellular Matrix Molecule Hyaluronic Acid Regulates Hippocampal Synaptic Plasticity by Modulating Post- synaptic L-Type Ca(2+) Channels. Neuron 2010, 67 (1), 116-128. · DOI · Paper page
  146. Monslow, J.; Govindaraju, P.; Pure, E. Hyaluronan -a Functional and Structural Sweet Spot in the Tissue Microenviron- ment. Front. Immunol. 2015, 6, 231. · DOI
  147. Yang, C.; Cao, M.; Liu, H.; He, Y.; Xu, J.; Du, Y.; Liu, Y.; Wang, W.; Cui, L.; Hu, J.; Gao, F. The High and Low Molecular Weight Forms of Hyaluronan Have Distinct Effects on CD44 Clustering. J. Biol. Chem. 2012, 287 (51), 43094-43107. · DOI
  148. Bohaumilitzky, L.; Huber, A. K.; Stork, E. M.; Wengert, S.; Woelfl, F.; Boehm, H. A Trickster in Disguise: Hyaluronan's Ambivalent Roles in the Matrix. Front. Oncol. 2017, 7, 242. · DOI
  149. Freire-de-Lima, L. Sweet and Sour: The Impact of Differential Glycosylation in Cancer Cells Undergoing Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition. Front. Oncol. 2014, 4, 59. · DOI
  150. Hsiao, C.-T.; Cheng, H.-W.; Huang, C.-M.; Li, H.-R.; Ou, M.- H.; Huang, J.-R.; Khoo, K.-H.; Yu, H. W.; Chen, Y.-Q.; Wang, Y.-K.; Chiou, A.; Kuo, J.-C. Fibronectin in Cell Adhesion and Migration via N-Glycosylation. Oncotarget 2017, 8 (41), 70653-70668. · DOI
  151. Jurgensen, H. J.; Madsen, D. H.; Ingvarsen, S.; Melander, M. C.; Gardsvoll, H.; Patthy, L.; Engelholm, L. H.; Behrendt, N. A Novel Functional Role of Collagen Glycosylation: Interaction with the Endocytic Collagen Receptor Uparap/ENDO180. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286 (37), 32736-32748. · DOI
  152. Kariya, Y.; Kato, R.; Itoh, S.; Fukuda, T.; Shibukawa, Y.; Sanzen, N.; Sekiguchi, K.; Wada, Y.; Kawasaki, N.; Gu, J. N- Glycosylation of Laminin-332 Regulates Its Biological Functions. A Novel Function of the Bisecting GlcNAc. J. Biol. Chem. 2008, 283 (48), 33036-33045. · DOI
  153. Hinderer, S.; Layland, S. L.; Schenke-Layland, K. ECM and ECM-like Materials -Biomaterials for Applications in Regenerative Medicine and Cancer Therapy. Adv. Drug Delivery Rev. 2016, 97, 260-269. · DOI · Paper page
  154. Amelian, A.; Wasilewska, K.; Megias, D.; Winnicka, K. Application of Standard Cell Cultures and 3D in Vitro Tissue Models as an Effective Tool in Drug Design and Development. Pharmacol. Rep. 2017, 69 (5), 861-870. · DOI
  155. Bao, M.; Xie, J.; Huck, W. T. S. Recent Advances in Engineering the Stem Cell Microniche in 3D. Adv. Sci. (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Ger. 2018, 5 (8), 1800448. · DOI
  156. Darnell, M.; O'Neil, A.; Mao, A.; Gu, L.; Rubin, L. L.; Mooney, D. J. Material Microenvironmental Properties Couple to Induce Distinct Transcriptional Programs in Mammalian Stem Cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 2018, 115 (36), E8368-E8377. · DOI · Paper page
  157. Cristofaro, F.; Gigli, M.; Bloise, N.; Chen, H.; Bruni, G.; Munari, A.; Moroni, L.; Lotti, N.; Visai, L. Influence of the Nanofiber Chemistry and Orientation of Biodegradable Poly(Butylene Succi- nate)-Based Scaffolds on Osteoblast Differentiation for Bone Tissue Regeneration. Nanoscale 2018, 10 (18), 8689-8703. · DOI
  158. Sepantafar, M.; Maheronnaghsh, R.; Mohammadi, H.; Radmanesh, F.; Hasani-Sadrabadi, M. M.; Ebrahimi, M.; Baharvand, H. Engineered Hydrogels in Cancer Therapy and Diagnosis. Trends Biotechnol. 2017, 35 (11), 1074-1087. · DOI
  159. Damanik, F. F. R.; Spadolini, G.; Rotmans, J.; Fare, S.; Moroni, L. Biological Activity of Human Mesenchymal Stromal Cells on Polymeric Electrospun Scaffolds. Biomater. Sci. 2019, 7 (3), 1088- 1100. · DOI
  160. Murphy, A. R.; Laslett, A.; O'Brien, C. M.; Cameron, N. R. Scaffolds for 3D in Vitro Culture of Neural Lineage Cells. Acta Biomater. 2017, 54, 1-20. · DOI
  161. Haycock, J. W. 3D Cell Culture: A Review of Current Approaches and Techniques. Methods Mol. Biol. 2011, 695, 1-15. · DOI
  162. Brown, T. E.; Anseth, K. S. Spatiotemporal Hydrogel Biomaterials for Regenerative Medicine. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2017, 46 (21), 6532-6552. · DOI
  163. Kramer, R. Z.; Bella, J.; Mayville, P.; Brodsky, B.; Berman, H. M. Sequence Dependent Conformational Variations of Collagen Triple-Helical Structure. Nat. Struct. Biol. 1999, 6 (5), 454-457. · DOI
  164. Graille, M.; Pagano, M.; Rose, T.; Ravaux, M. R.; van Tilbeurgh, H. Zinc Induces Structural Reorganization of Gelatin Binding Domain from Human Fibronectin and Affects Collagen Binding. Structure 2010, 18 (6), 710-718. · DOI
  165. Sgambato, A.; Cipolla, L.; Russo, L. Bioresponsive Hydrogels: Chemical Strategies and Perspectives in Tissue Engineering. Gels 2016, 2 (4), 28. · DOI
  166. Verjans, E.-T.; Doijen, J.; Luyten, W.; Landuyt, B.; Schoofs, L. Three-Dimensional Cell Culture Models for Anticancer Drug Screening: Worth the Effort? J. Cell. Physiol. 2018, 233 (4), 2993- 3003. · DOI · Paper page
  167. Bajaj, P.; Schweller, R. M.; Khademhosseini, A.; West, J. L.; Bashir, R. 3D Biofabrication Strategies for Tissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine. Annu. Rev. Biomed. Eng. 2014, 16 (1), 247- 276. · DOI · Paper page
  168. Ventre, M.; Netti, P. A. Engineering Cell Instructive Materials To Control Cell Fate and Functions through Material Cues and Surface Patterning. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2016, 8 (24), 14896- 14908. · DOI
  169. Crowder, S. W.; Leonardo, V.; Whittaker, T.; Papathanasiou, P.; Stevens, M. M. Material Cues as Potent Regulators of Epigenetics and Stem Cell Function. Cell Stem Cell 2016, 18 (1), 39-52. · DOI
  170. Cruz-Acuna, R.; Garcia, A. J. Synthetic Hydrogels Mimicking Basement Membrane Matrices to Promote Cell-Matrix Interactions. Matrix Biol. 2017, 57-58, 324-333. · DOI
  171. Dutta, R. C.; Dutta, A. K. Cell-Interactive 3D-Scaffold; Advances and Applications. Biotechnol. Adv. 2009, 27 (4), 334-339. (181 · DOI
  172. Rice, J. J.; Martino, M. M.; De Laporte, L.; Tortelli, F.; Briquez, P. S.; Hubbell, J. A. Engineering the Regenerative Microenvironment with Biomaterials. Adv. Healthcare Mater. 2013, 2 (1), 57-71. · DOI
  173. Ovsianikov, A.; Khademhosseini, A.; Mironov, V. The Synergy of Scaffold-Based and Scaffold-Free Tissue Engineering Strategies. Trends Biotechnol. 2018, 36 (4), 348-357. · DOI · Paper page
  174. Shigemitsu, H.; Hamachi, I. Design Strategies of Stimuli- Responsive Supramolecular Hydrogels Relying on Structural Analyses and Cell-Mimicking Approaches. Acc. Chem. Res. 2017, 50 (4), 740- 750. · DOI
  175. Lutolf, M. P.; Gilbert, P. M.; Blau, H. M. Designing Materials to Direct Stem-Cell Fate. Nature 2009, 462 (7272), 433-441. · DOI
  176. Handorf, A. M.; Zhou, Y.; Halanski, M. A.; Li, W.-J. Tissue Stiffness Dictates Development, Homeostasis, and Disease Pro- gression. Organogenesis 2015, 11 (1), 1-15. · DOI
  177. Chaudhuri, O.; Koshy, S. T.; Branco da Cunha, C.; Shin, J.- W.; Verbeke, C. S.; Allison, K. H.; Mooney, D. J. Extracellular Matrix Stiffness and Composition Jointly Regulate the Induction of Malignant Phenotypes in Mammary Epithelium. Nat. Mater. 2014, 13 (10), 970-978. · DOI · Paper page
  178. Cavo, M.; Fato, M.; Penuela, L.; Beltrame, F.; Raiteri, R.; Scaglione, S. Microenvironment Complexity and Matrix Stiffness Regulate Breast Cancer Cell Activity in a 3D in Vitro Model. Sci. Rep. 2016, 6 (1), 35367. · DOI
  179. Biernacka, A.; Dobaczewski, M.; Frangogiannis, N. G. TGF-β Signaling in Fibrosis. Growth Factors 2011, 29 (5), 196-202. · DOI
  180. Baker, A.-M.; Bird, D.; Lang, G.; Cox, T. R.; Erler, J. T. Lysyl Oxidase Enzymatic Function Increases Stiffness to Drive Colorectal Cancer Progression through FAK. Oncogene 2013, 32, 1863-1868. · DOI
  181. Voorhees, A. P.; DeLeon-Pennell, K. Y.; Ma, Y.; Halade, G. V.; Yabluchanskiy, A.; Iyer, R. P.; Flynn, E.; Cates, C. A.; Lindsey, M. L.; Han, H. C. Building a Better Infarct: Modulation of Collagen Cross- Linking to Increase Infarct Stiffness and Reduce Left Ventricular Dilation Post-Myocardial Infarction. J. Mol. Cell. Cardiol. 2015, 85, 229-239. · DOI
  182. Spicer, C. D.; Pashuck, E. T.; Stevens, M. M. Achieving Controlled Biomolecule-Biomaterial Conjugation. Chem. Rev. 2018, 118 (16), 7702-7743. · DOI
  183. Slaughter, B. V.; Khurshid, S. S.; Fisher, O. Z.; Khademhosseini, A.; Peppas, N. A. Hydrogels in Regenerative Medicine. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21 (32-33), 3307-3329. · DOI · Paper page
  184. Ooi, H. W.; Hafeez, S.; van Blitterswijk, C. A.; Moroni, L.; Baker, M. B. Hydrogels That Listen to Cells: A Review of Cell- Responsive Strategies in Biomaterial Design for Tissue Regeneration. Mater. Horiz. 2017, 4 (6), 1020-1040. · DOI
  185. Patterson, D. M.; Nazarova, L. A.; Prescher, J. A. Finding the Right (Bioorthogonal) Chemistry. ACS Chem. Biol. 2014, 9 (3), 592- 605. · DOI
  186. Mohamed, M. A.; Fallahi, A.; El-Sokkary, A. M. A.; Salehi, S.; Akl, M. A.; Jafari, A.; Tamayol, A.; Fenniri, H.; Khademhosseini, A.; Andreadis, S. T.; Cheng, C. Stimuli-Responsive Hydrogels for Manipulation of Cell Microenvironment: From Chemistry to Biofabrication Technology. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2019, 98, 101147. · DOI
  187. Occhetta, P.; Visone, R.; Russo, L.; Cipolla, L.; Moretti, M.; Rasponi, M. VA-086 Methacrylate Gelatine Photopolymerizable Hydrogels: A Parametric Study for Highly Biocompatible 3D Cell Embedding. J. Biomed. Mater. Res., Part A 2015, 103 (6), 2109-2117. · DOI
  188. Poldervaart, M. T.; Goversen, B.; de Ruijter, M.; Abbadessa, A.; Melchels, F. P. W.; Oner, F. C.; Dhert, W. J. A.; Vermonden, T.; Alblas, J. 3D Bioprinting of Methacrylated Hyaluronic Acid (MeHA) Hydrogel with Intrinsic Osteogenicity. PLoS One 2017, 12 (6), No. e0177628. · DOI
  189. Yue, K.; Li, X.; Schrobback, K.; Sheikhi, A.; Annabi, N.; Leijten, J.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, Y. S.; Hutmacher, D. W.; Klein, T. J.; Khademhosseini, A. Structural Analysis of Photocrosslinkable Methacryloyl-Modified Protein Derivatives. Biomaterials 2017, 139, 163-171. · DOI
  190. Klotz, B. J.; Gawlitta, D.; Rosenberg, A. J. W. P.; Malda, J.; Melchels, F. P. W. Gelatin-Methacryloyl Hydrogels: Towards Biofabrication-Based Tissue Repair. Trends Biotechnol. 2016, 34 (5), 394-407. · DOI
  191. Russo, L.; Sgambato, A.; Visone, R.; Occhetta, P.; Moretti, M.; Rasponi, M.; Nicotra, F.; Cipolla, L. Gelatin Hydrogels via Thiol-Ene Chemistry. Monatsh. Chem. 2016, 147 (3), 587-592. · DOI
  192. Lin, C.-C.; Raza, A.; Shih, H. PEG Hydrogels Formed by Thiol-Ene Photo-Click Chemistry and Their Effect on the Formation and Recovery of Insulin-Secreting Cell Spheroids. Biomaterials 2011, 32 (36), 9685-9695. · DOI
  193. Ooi, H. W.; Mota, C.; Ten Cate, A. T.; Calore, A.; Moroni, L.; Baker, M. B. Thiol-Ene Alginate Hydrogels as Versatile Bioinks for Bioprinting. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (8), 3390-3400. · DOI
  194. Bertlein, S.; Brown, G.; Lim, K. S.; Jungst, T.; Boeck, T.; Blunk, T.; Tessmar, J.; Hooper, G. J.; Woodfield, T. B. F.; Groll, J. Thiol-Ene Clickable Gelatin: A Platform Bioink for Multiple 3D Biofabrication Technologies. Adv. Mater. 2017, 29 (44), 1703404. · DOI
  195. Allazetta, S.; Hausherr, T. C.; Lutolf, M. P. Microfluidic Synthesis of Cell-Type-Specific Artificial Extracellular Matrix Hydro- gels. Biomacromolecules 2013, 14 (4), 1122-1131. · DOI
  196. Brown, T. E.; Carberry, B. J.; Worrell, B. T.; Dudaryeva, O. Y.; McBride, M. K.; Bowman, C. N.; Anseth, K. S. Photopolymerized Dynamic Hydrogels with Tunable Viscoelastic Properties through Thioester Exchange. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 496-503. · DOI
  197. Grim, J. C.; Brown, T. E.; Aguado, B. A.; Chapnick, D. A.; Viert, A. L.; Liu, X.; Anseth, K. S. A Reversible and Repeatable Thiol- Ene Bioconjugation for Dynamic Patterning of Signaling Proteins in Hydrogels. ACS Cent. Sci. 2018, 4 (7), 909-916. · DOI
  198. Macdougall, L. J.; Peŕez-Madrigal, M. M.; Arno, M. C.; Dove, A. P. Nonswelling Thiol-Yne Cross-Linked Hydrogel Materials as Cytocompatible Soft Tissue Scaffolds. Biomacromolecules 2018, 19 (5), 1378-1388. · DOI
  199. Macdougall, L. J.; Wiley, K. L.; Kloxin, A. M.; Dove, A. P. Design of Synthetic Extracellular Matrices for Probing Breast Cancer Cell Growth Using Robust Cyctocompatible Nucleophilic Thiol-Yne Addition Chemistry. Biomaterials 2018, 178, 435-447. · DOI
  200. Freudenberg, U.; Liang, Y.; Kiick, K. L.; Werner, C. Glycosaminoglycan-Based Biohybrid Hydrogels: A Sweet and Smart Choice for Multifunctional Biomaterials. Adv. Mater. 2016, 28 (40), 8861-8891. · DOI

200 of 389 shown

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Nicolas, J., Magli, S., Rabbachin, L., Sampaolesi, S., Nicotra, F., & Russo, L.
Affiliations
  • Institut Galien Paris-Saclay , , , ,
  • University of Milano-Bicocca , , Piazza della Scienza 2 , ,
Venue
Biomacromolecules
Published
2020-03-31
Volume
21
Issue
6
Pages
1968-1994
ISSN
  • 1525-7797
  • 1526-4602
Cited by
504
References
16
Language
en
Funders
  • H2020 Industrial Leadership (760986)
  • Ministero della Salute (RF-2016-02362946)
  • Regione Lombardia (NA)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review