Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 3,578

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges

Open access
Miorandi, Daniele, Sicari, Sabrina, De Pellegrini, Francesco, Chlamtac, Imrich·2012·Ad Hoc Networks
DOI 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 111

  1. Atzori, 2010, The Internet of Things: a survey, Comput. Netw., 54, 2787, 10.1016/j.comnet.2010.05.010 · DOI · Paper page
  2. Zorzi, 2010, A. Bassi, From today’s INTRAnet of things to a future INTERnet of things: a wireless- and mobility-related view, IEEE Wireless Commun., 17, 44, 10.1109/MWC.2010.5675777 · DOI · Paper page
  3. J. Buckley, From RFID to the Internet of things: pervasive networked systems, Final Report on the Conference organised by DG Information Society and Media, Networks and Communication Technologies Directorate, March 2006. <ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/ka4/au_conf670306_buckley_en.pdf>.
  4. Kortuem, 2010, Smart objects as building blocks for the internet of things, IEEE Internet Comput., 14, 44, 10.1109/MIC.2009.143 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Roussos, 2009, RFID in pervasive computing: state-of-the-art and outlook, Pervasive Mob. Comput., 5, 110, 10.1016/j.pmcj.2008.11.004 · DOI
  6. Akyilidiz, 2002, Wireless sensor network: a survey, Comput. Netw., 38, 393, 10.1016/S1389-1286(01)00302-4 · DOI · Paper page
  7. Akyildiz, 2004, Wireless sensor and actor networks: research challenges, Ad Hoc Netw. J., 2, 351, 10.1016/j.adhoc.2004.04.003 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Saltzer, 1984, End-to-end arguments in system design, ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 2, 277, 10.1145/357401.357402 · DOI
  9. V. Jacobson, D.K. Smetters, J.D. Thornton, M.F. Plasee, N. Briggs, R. Braynard, Networking named content, in: Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT, Rome, Italy, 2009, pp. 1–12. · DOI · Paper page
  10. Dobson, 2006, A survey of autonomic communications, TAAS, 1, 223, 10.1145/1186778.1186782 · DOI · Paper page
  11. W. Elmenreich, R. D’Souza, C. Bettstetter, H. de Meer, A survey of models and design methods for self-organizing networked systems, in: IWSOS, 2009, pp. 37–49. · DOI
  12. Guinard, 2010, Interacting with the SOA-based Internet of Things: discovery, query, selection, and on-demand provisioning of Web services, IEEE Trans. Serv. Comput., 3, 223, 10.1109/TSC.2010.3 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Chen, 2010, Development of foundation models for Internet of Things, Front. Comput. Sci. China, 4, 376, 10.1007/s11704-010-0385-8 · DOI
  14. Michahelles, 2007, Pervasive RFID and near field communication technology, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 6, 94, 10.1109/MPRV.2007.64 · doi:10.1109/mprv.2007.64
  15. Haykin, 2005, Cognitive radio: brain-empowered wireless communications, IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun., 23, 201, 10.1109/JSAC.2004.839380 · DOI · Paper page
  16. Chlamtac, 2003, Mobile ad hoc networking: imperatives and challenges, Ad Hoc Netw., 1, 13, 10.1016/S1570-8705(03)00013-1 · DOI · Paper page
  17. M. Murphy, J. Butler, Proactive computing: RFID & sensor networks, Final Report on the Conference organised by DG Information Society and Media, Networks and Communication Technologies Directorate, March 2006. <ftp://ftp.cordis.europa.eu/pub/ist/docs/ka4/au_conf670306_murphy_en.pdf>.
  18. M. Durvy, J. Abeillé, P. Wetterwald, C. O’Flynn, B. Leverett, E. Gnoske, M. Vidales, G. Mulligan, N. Tsiftes, N. Finne, A. Dunkels, Making sensor networks ipv6 ready, in: Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Conference on Networked Embedded Sensor Systems (ACM SenSys 2008), poster session, Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2008, pp. 421–422. · DOI · Paper page
  19. Raghunathan, 2006, Emerging techniques for long lived wireless sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 44, 108, 10.1109/MCOM.2006.1632657 · DOI · Paper page
  20. Akan, 2009, Wireless passive sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 47, 92, 10.1109/MCOM.2009.5181898 · doi:10.1109/mcom.2009.5181898
  21. Akyilidiz, 2008, Nanonetworking: a new communication paradigm, Comput. Netw., 52, 2260, 10.1016/j.comnet.2008.04.001 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Liu, 2008, Taxonomy and challenges of the integration of RFID and wireless sensor networks, IEEE Netw., 22, 26, 10.1109/MNET.2008.4694171 · DOI · Paper page
  23. L. Zhang, Z. Wang, Integration of RFID into wireless sensor networks: architectures, opportunities and challenging problems, in: Proceedings of GCCW, 2006, pp. 463–469. · doi:10.1109/gccw.2006.58
  24. R. Grimm, T. Anderson, B. Bershad, D. Wetherall, A system architecture for pervasive computing, in: Proceedings of the 9th ACM SIGOPS European Workshop, Kolding, Denmark, 2000, pp. 177–182. · doi:10.1145/566752.566763
  25. G. Judd, P. Steenkiste, Providing contextual information to pervasive computing applications, in: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing (PERCOM’03), Dallas, 2003, pp. 29–43. · doi:10.1109/percom.2003.1192735
  26. Schilit, 1994, Disseminating active map information to mobile hosts, IEEE Netw., 8, 22, 10.1109/65.313011 · DOI · Paper page
  27. B. Schilit, N. Adams, R. Want, Context-aware computing applications, in: Proceedings of the IEEE Workshop on Mobile Computing Systems and Applications, Santa Cruz, CA, 1994, pp. 85–90. · DOI · Paper page
  28. B. Brumitt, S. Shafer, Topological world modeling using semantic spaces, in: Proceedings of Workshop on Location Modeling for Ubiquitous Computing, Atlanta, GA, 2001, pp. 55–62.
  29. Baldauf, 2007, A survey on context-aware systems, Int. J. Ad Hoc Ubiquitous Comput., 2, 263, 10.1504/IJAHUC.2007.014070 · DOI · Paper page
  30. Coutaz, 2005, Context is key, Commun. ACM, 48, 49, 10.1145/1047671.1047703 · DOI · Paper page
  31. Krause, 2006, Context-aware mobile computing: learning context dependent personal preferences from wearable sensor array, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 5, 113, 10.1109/TMC.2006.18 · DOI
  32. A.K. Clear, R. Shannon, T. Holland, A. Quigley, S. Dobson, P.Nixon, SITUVIS: a visual tool for modelling a users behavior patterns in a pervasive environment, in: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Pervasive Computing, Nara, Japan, 2009, pp. 327–341. · doi:10.1007/978-3-642-01516-8_22
  33. Loke, 2004, Representing and reasoning with situations for context-aware pervasive computing:a logic programming perspective, The Knowl. Eng. Rev., 19, 213, 10.1017/S0269888905000263 · DOI
  34. V. Andrikopoulos, S. Benbernou, M.P. Papazoglou, Managing the evolution of service specifications, in: Proceedings of 20th International Conference on the Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE 2008, Montpellier, France, 2008, pp. 359–374. · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-69534-9_28
  35. Papazoglou, 2007, Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues, VLDB J., 16, 389, 10.1007/s00778-007-0044-3 · DOI · Paper page
  36. M. Papazoglou, Foresight & research priorities for service oriented computing, in: Proceedings of the 11th International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Milan, Italy, 2009, pp. 5–6.
  37. T. Yu, M. Winslett, A unified scheme for resource protection in automated trust negotiation, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium Security and Privacy, Colorado Springs, 2003, pp. 110–122.
  38. W. Ye, J. Heidemann, D. Estrin, An energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE INFOCOM, vol. 3, 2002, pp. 1567–1576. · DOI · Paper page
  39. J. Polastre, J. Hill, D. Culler, Versatile low power media access for wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Baltimore, MD, USA, 2004, pp. 95–107. · DOI · Paper page
  40. G. Lu, B. Krishnamachari, C. Raghavendra, An adaptive energy-efficient and low-latency MAC for data gathering in sensor networks, in: Proceedings of International Workshop on Algorithms for Wireless, Mobile, Ad Hoc and Sensor Networks (WMAN), Santa Fe, NM, 2004, p. 224.
  41. Enz, 2004, WiseNET: an ultralow-power wireless sensor network solution, IEEE Comput., 37, 62, 10.1109/MC.2004.109 · DOI · Paper page
  42. Schurgers, 2002, Optimizing sensor networks in the energy-latency-density design space, IEEE Trans. Mob. Comput., 1, 70, 10.1109/TMC.2002.1011060 · doi:10.1109/tmc.2002.1011060
  43. G. Merrett, N. White, N. Harris, B. Al-Hashimi, Energy-aware simulation for wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE SECON, Rome, Italy, 2009, pp. 64–71. · DOI
  44. Kansal, 2007, Power management in energy harvesting sensor networks, ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst., 6, 32, 10.1145/1274858.1274870 · DOI · Paper page
  45. Giridhar, 2005, Computing and communicating functions over sensor networks, IEEE JSAC, 23, 755
  46. Gupta, 2000, The capacity of wireless networks, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 46, 388, 10.1109/18.825799 · DOI · Paper page
  47. A.R.I. Schizas, G.B. Giannakis, Distributed estimation with ad hoc wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of EURASIP EUSIPCO, Florence, 2006.
  48. Scherber, 2005, Distributed computing of averages over ad-hoc networks, IEEE JSAC, 23, 755
  49. S. Barbarossa, G. Scutari, A. Swami, Distributed detection and estimation in decentralized sensor networks: and overview, in: Proceedings of EURASIP EUSIPCO, Florence, 2006.
  50. M.Z.H.Y.E. Bottega, P. Popowsky, R. Prasad, Hypothesis testing over a random access channel in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of EURASIP EUSIPCO, Florence, Italy, 2006.
  51. Mergen, 2006, Type based estimation over multiaccess channels, IEEE Trans. Signal Process., 54, 613, 10.1109/TSP.2005.861896 · DOI
  52. Gallagher, 1988, Finding parity in a simple broadcast network, IEEE Trans. Inform. Theory, 34, 176, 10.1109/18.2626 · doi:10.1109/18.2626
  53. E. Kushilevitz, Y. Mansour, Computation in noisy radio networks, in: Proceedings of ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, San Francisco, USA, 1998, pp. 236–243.
  54. Giridhar, 2006, Towards a theory of in-network computation in wireless sensor networks, IEEE Commun. Mag., 44, 98, 10.1109/MCOM.2006.1632656 · DOI · Paper page
  55. Warneke, 2001, Smart dust: communicating with a cubic-millimeter computer, Computer, 34, 44, 10.1109/2.895117 · DOI · Paper page
  56. Harter, 1994, A distributed location system for the active office, IEEE Netw., 8, 62, 10.1109/65.260080 · DOI · Paper page
  57. Abowd, 1997, Cyberguide: a mobile context-aware tour guide, Wireless Netw., 3, 421, 10.1023/A:1019194325861 · DOI · Paper page
  58. Vicaire, 2009, Achieving long-term surveillance in vigilne, ACM Trans. Sens. Netw., 5, 1, 10.1145/1464420.1464429 · doi:10.1145/1464420.1464429
  59. D. Moore, J. Leonard, D. Rus, S. Teller, Robust distributed network localization with noisy range measurements, in: Proceedings of SenSys ’04, Baltimore, USA, 2004, pp. 50–61. · DOI · Paper page
  60. S. Ray, R. Ungrangsi, F.D. Pellegrini, A. Trachtenberg, D. Starobinski, Robust location detection in emergency sensor networks, in: Proceedings of INFOCOM, S. Francisco, CA, 2003, pp. 1044–1053. · DOI
  61. Gezici, 2005, Localization via ultra-wideband radios, IEEE Signal Process. Mag., 22, 70, 10.1109/MSP.2005.1458289 · DOI · Paper page
  62. C. Decker et al., Cost–benefit model for smart items in the supply chain, in: Proceedings of IOT Conference, Zurich, Switzerland, 2008, pp. 155–172. · doi:10.1007/978-3-540-78731-0_10
  63. C. Bornhövd, T. Lin, S. Haller, J. Schaper, Integrating automatic data acquisition with business processes experiences with sap’s auto-id infrastructure, in: VLDB ’04: Proceedings of the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, VLDB Endowment, 2004, pp. 1182–1188. · doi:10.1016/b978-012088469-8.50103-0
  64. J.N. Tsitsiklis, Problems in decentralized decision making and computation, Ph.D. thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1984.
  65. Jelasity, 2005, Gossip-based aggregation in large dynamic networks, ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 23, 219, 10.1145/1082469.1082470 · DOI
  66. D. Kempe, A. Dobra, J. Gehrke, Gossip-based computation of aggregate information, in: Proceedings of FOCS, IEEE, Cambridge, MA, USA, 2003, pp. 482–491. · DOI · Paper page
  67. Garay, 1998, Fully polynomial byzantine agreement for n>3t processors in t+1 rounds, SIAM J. Comput., 27, 247, 10.1137/S0097539794265232 · DOI
  68. D. Spanos, R. Olfati-Saber, R.M. Murray, Distributed sensor fusion using dynamic consensus, in: Proceedings of IFAC’05, Prague, 2005, p. 99.
  69. L. Xiao, S. Boyd, S. Lall, A scheme for asynchronous distributed sensor fusion based on average consensus, in: Proceedings of IPSN’05, Los Angeles, USA, 2005, p. 99.
  70. R.C. Shah, S. Roy, S. Jain, W. Brunette, Data mules: modeling a three-tier architecture for sparse sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Workshop on Sensor Networks Protocols and Applications, 2003, pp. 30–41. · DOI · Paper page
  71. F. De Pellegrini, C. Moiso, D. Miorandi, I. Chlamtac, R-P2P: a data centric dtn middleware with interconnected throwboxes, in: Proceedings of Autonomics, Turin, Italy, 2008, pp. 11–20. · doi:10.4108/icst.autonomics2008.4598
  72. Carreras, 2007, BIONETS: bio-inspired networking for pervasive communication environments, IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., 56, 218, 10.1109/TVT.2006.883762 · DOI
  73. J. Padhye, V. Firoiu, D. Towsley, J. Kurose, Modeling TCP throughput: a simple model and its empirical validation, in: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM, Vancouver, CA, 1998, pp. 303–314. · DOI · Paper page
  74. W. Masri, Z. Mammeri, Middleware for wireless sensor networks: a comparative analysis, in: Proceedings of IFIP International Network and Parallel Computing Workshops (NPC), China, 2007, pp. 349–356. · doi:10.1109/npc.2007.165
  75. Charles, 1999, Middleware moves to the forefront, Computer, 32, 17, 10.1109/MC.1999.762786 · doi:10.1109/mc.1999.762786
  76. N. Ibrahim, Orthogonal classification of middleware technologies, in: Proceedings of UBICOMM ’09, Sliema, Malta, 2009, pp. 46–51. · DOI
  77. Sandholm, 1997, Coalitions among computationally bounded agents, Artif. Intell., 1, 99, 10.1016/S0004-3702(97)00030-1 · DOI · Paper page
  78. Estrin, 2002, Connecting the physical world with pervasive networks, IEEE Pervasive Comput., 1, 59, 10.1109/MPRV.2002.993145 · DOI · Paper page
  79. E. Zelkha, B. Epstein, From devices to ambient intelligence, in: Digital Living Room Conference, Laguna Niguel, California, 1998.
  80. M. Berger, F. Fuchs, M. Pirker, Ambient intelligence – from personal assistance to intelligent megacities, in: Proceedings of Conference on Advances in Ambient Intelligence, 2007, pp. 21–35. · doi:10.1524/itit.2008.0457
  81. Kranz, 2010, Embedded interaction: interacting with the internet of things, IEEE Internet Comput., 14, 46, 10.1109/MIC.2009.141 · DOI
  82. Sandhu, 1996, Role-based access control models, IEEE Comput., 29, 38, 10.1109/2.485845 · DOI · Paper page
  83. W. Lindner, J. Meier, Securing the borealis data stream engine, in: Proceedings of the International Database Engineering and Application Symposium (IDEAS’06), Delhi, India, 2006, pp. 137–147. · DOI
  84. R. Nehme, E. Rundesteiner, E. Bertino, A security punctuation framework for enforcing access control on streaming data, in: Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Data Engineering (ICDE’08), Cancun, Mexico, 2008, pp. 406–415. · DOI
  85. Carminati, 2008, A framework to enforce access control over data streams, ACM Trans. Inform. Syst. Sec. (TISSEC), 13, 1, 10.1145/1805974.1805984 · doi:10.1145/1805974.1805984
  86. B. Carminati, E. Ferrari, K. Tan, Enforcing access control policies on data streams, in: Proceedings of the 12th ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies (SACMAT’07), Sophia Antipolis, France, 2007, pp. 21–30. · doi:10.1145/1266840.1266845
  87. L. Hu, D. Evans, Secure data aggregation in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE WSAAN, Orlando, Florida, USA, 2003, pp. 93–105.
  88. A. Mahimkar, T. Rappaport, SECUREDAV: a secure data aggregation and verification protocol for sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE Globecom, Dallas, Texas, USA, 2004, pp. 2175–2179. · DOI
  89. B. Przydatek, D. Song, A. Perrig, SIA: secure information aggregation in sensor networks, in: Proceedings of ACM SenSys, Los Angeles, California, USA, 2003, pp. 255–265. · DOI · Paper page
  90. M. Bagaa, N. Lasla, A. Ouadjaout, Y. Challal, SEDAN: secure and efficient protocol for data aggregation in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE LCN, Dublin, Ireland, 2007, pp. 1053–1060. · doi:10.1109/lcn.2007.81
  91. C. Castelluccia, E. Mykletun, G. Tsudik, Efficient aggregation of encrypted data in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of MobiQuitous, San Diego, CA, USA, 2005, pp. 109–117. · DOI · Paper page
  92. J. Girao, D. Westhoff, M. Schneider, CDA: concealed data aggregation for reverse multicast traffic in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Seoul, Korea, 2005, pp. 3044–3049. · DOI
  93. R. Riggio, S. Sicari, Secure aggregation in hybrid mesh/sensor networks, in: Proceedings of SASN, Saint Petersburg, Russia, 2009, pp. 1–6. · doi:10.1109/icumt.2009.5345610
  94. A. Coen-Porisini, S. Sicari, SeDAP: Secure data aggregation protocol in privacy aware wireless sensor networks, in: Springer Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Sensor Systems and Software, Miami, Florida, USA, 2010. · DOI
  95. E. Mykletun, J. Girao, D. Westhoff, Public key based cryptoschemes for data concealment in wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of IEEE ICC, Istanbul, Turkey, 2006, pp. 2288–2295. · DOI · Paper page
  96. L. Eschenauer, V.D. Gligor, A key-management scheme for distributed sensor networks, in: Proceedings of ACM CCS, Washington, DC, USA, 2002, pp. 41–47. · DOI · Paper page
  97. R.D. Pietro, A. Mei, L.V. Mancini, Random key assignment for secure wireless sensor networks, in: Proceedings of ACM SASN, Fairfax, VA, USA, 2003, pp. 62–71. · DOI · Paper page
  98. R.D. Pietro, C. Soriente, A. Spognardi, G. Tsudik, Collaborative authentication in unattended WSNs, in: Proceedings of ACN WiSec, Zurich, Switzerland, 2009, pp. 237–244. · DOI
  99. Mielikinen, 2004, Privacy problems with anonymized transaction databases, vol. 3245
  100. Bhargavspantzel, 2007, Trust negotiation in identity management, IEEE Secur. Priv., 55, 10.1109/MSP.2007.46 · DOI
  101. Lamsweerde, 2000, Obstacles in goal-oriented requirement engineering, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 26, 978, 10.1109/32.879820 · DOI · Paper page
  102. L. Liu, E. Yu, J. Mylopoulos, Analyzing security requirements as relationships among strategic actors, in: Proceedings of International Symposium on Requirements Engineering for Information Security (SREIS), Raleigh, North Carolina, USA, 2002.
  103. Mouratidis, 2003, Integrating security and systems engineering: towards the modelling of secure information system, vol. 2681, 63
  104. L. Chung, Dealing with security requirements during the development of information system, in: Proceedings of International Conference on Advanced Information System Engineering (CAiSE), vol. Klagenfurt/Velden, Austria, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, Springer, Paris, France, 1993, pp. 234–251.
  105. Mylopolulos, 1998, Representing and using non functional requirements: a process oriented approach, IEEE Trans. Softw. Eng., 18, 483, 10.1109/32.142871 · DOI · Paper page
  106. A. Anton, Goal-based requirements analysis, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Requirements Engineering (ICRE 96), Colorado Springs, 1996, pp. 136–144. · DOI
  107. Kavakli, 2008, Addressing privacy requirements in system design: the pris method, J. Requirements Eng., 13, 241, 10.1007/s00766-008-0067-3 · DOI · Paper page
  108. A. Coen-Porisini, P. Colombo, S. Sicari, Privacy aware systems: from models to patterns, in: Software Engineering for Secure Systems: Industrial and Research Perspectives, IGI Global, 2010. · DOI
  109. M. Blaze, J. Feigenbaum, J. Lacy, Decentralized trust management, in: Proceedings of IEEE International Symposium Security and Privacy, Colorado Springs, 1996, pp. 164–173. · DOI · Paper page
  110. Ren, 2004, Highly realible trust establishment scheme in ad hoc networks, Comput. Netw., 45, 687, 10.1016/j.comnet.2004.01.008 · doi:10.1016/j.comnet.2004.01.008
  111. Liang, 2005, Enforcing cooperative resource sharing in untrusted peer to peer environment, ACM J. Mobile Netw. Appl., 10, 771

Cited by

See all 3,578

Metadata

Authors
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I.
Venue
Ad Hoc Networks
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2012-09
Volume
10
Issue
7
Pages
1497-1516
ISSN
1570-8705 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016
OpenAlex
W2119046642
Cited by
3,578
References
3
FWCI
207.22
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze
Licence
www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/ (tdm)

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016
The paper
Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., & Chlamtac, I. (2012). Internet of things: Vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Networks. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adhoc.2012.02.016

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.